Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS

Family Planning and Reproductive Health

  • Open Access
    Comparing Women's Contraceptive Preferences With Their Choices in 5 Urban Family Planning Clinics in Ghana
    Sarah D Rominski, Emmanuel SK Morhe, Ernest Maya, Abukar Manu and Vanessa K Dalton
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):65-74; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00281

    Women's method choice largely matched their stated desired duration of effectiveness but not their desires to avoid certain side effects. While most women reported they were counseled about side effects, many fewer reported being specifically counseled about common menstrual side effects with their chosen method, including side effects the women said would cause them to stop using the method.

  • Open Access
    Women's Limited Choice and Availability of Modern Contraception at Retail Outlets and Public-Sector Facilities in Luanda, Angola, 2012–2015
    Benjamin Nieto-Andrade, Eva Fidel, Rebecca Simmons, Dana Sievers, Anya Fedorova, Suzanne Bell, Karen Weidert and Ndola Prata
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):75-89; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00304

    Despite high rates of unintended pregnancy, access to a wide range of contraceptive methods, especially injectables and long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), is severely limited in both public and private facilities. Knowledge of contraceptive choices is likewise limited, yet a substantial proportion of women are not using their preferred method among the methods they know of.

  • Open Access
    Vasectomy: A Long, Slow Haul to Successful Takeoff
    James D Shelton and Roy Jacobstein
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2016, 4(4):514-517; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00355

    Vasectomy use is plagued by low demand among men. Nevertheless, its compelling advantages make substantial investment worthwhile. On the supply side, a priority is to actively link vasectomy with service delivery approaches for the other highly effective long-acting and permanent clinical methods. Robust demand generation should include messaging specific to vasectomy, but should also draw on broader social and behavior change communication efforts increasingly aimed at engaging men in family planning.

  • Open Access
    Pilot Research as Advocacy: The Case of Sayana Press in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Arsene Binanga and Jane T Bertrand
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2016, 4(4):542-551; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00236

    The pilot study obtained Ministry of Health approval to allow medical and nursing students to provide the injectable contraceptive Sayana Press and other methods in the community, paving the way for other task-shifting pilots including self-injection of Sayana Press with supervision by the students as well as injection by community health workers.

  • Open Access
    Strengthening Government Leadership in Family Planning Programming in Senegal: From Proof of Concept to Proof of Implementation in 2 Districts
    Barry Aichatou, Cheikh Seck, Thierno Souleymane Baal Anne, Gabrielle Clémentine Deguenovo, Alexis Ntabona and Ruth Simmons
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2016, 4(4):568-581; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00250

    Based on a previous pilot experience, in a next proof-of-implementation phase, district authorities enthusiastically assumed leadership and mobilized local resources to implement a simplified package of family planning interventions, with outside technical support. Comparing a 6-month baseline period with a 6-month implementation period, couple-years of protection increased from about 2,000 to about 4,000 (82% increase) in one district, and from nearly 6,000 to about 9,000 (56% increase) in the second. Longer implementation periods could further support institutionalization and sustainability.

  • Open Access
    Key Role of Drug Shops and Pharmacies for Family Planning in Urban Nigeria and Kenya
    Meghan Corroon, Essete Kebede, Gean Spektor and Ilene Speizer
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2016, 4(4):594-609; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00197

    Pharmacies and drug shops provide a rich opportunity for expanding family planning access to urban women, especially unmarried and younger women. In urban Nigeria and Kenya, drug shops and pharmacies were the major sources for most short-acting methods, including oral contraceptive pills, emergency contraceptives, and condoms.

  • Open Access
    A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings
    Dominick Shattuck, Brian Perry, Catherine Packer and Dawn Chin Quee
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2016, 4(4):647-660; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235

    Reviewed areas included misconceptions and lack of knowledge among men, women, and providers; approaches to demand generation including community-based and mass media communications; service delivery innovations consisting of the no-scalpel vasectomy technique, whole-site training, cascade training, task shifting, and mobile outreach; and engagement of religious and community leaders to create an enabling environment.

  • Open Access
    An Implementer's Perspective on Vouchers for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services
    Matthew Wilson and Caitlin Mazzilli
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2016, 4(4):694-695; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00373
  • Open Access
    Effective LARC Providers: Moving Beyond Training (Republication)
    James D Shelton and Anne E Burke
    Global Health: Science and Practice September 2016, 4(3):356-358; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00258

    Effective and productive providers are the key to successful provision of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). But LARCs demand more of providers than short-acting resupply methods. In addition to sound training, key elements to developing highly productive providers of LARCs include a thorough understanding of the service delivery system context; selecting providers with the most potential, especially from mid-level cadres; strong mentoring and supportive supervision; and attention to the supply chain and to demand-side support.

  • Open Access
    Accessible Contraceptive Implant Removal Services: An Essential Element of Quality Service Delivery and Scale-Up
    Megan Christofield and Maryjane Lacoste
    Global Health: Science and Practice September 2016, 4(3):366-372; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00096

    Use of contraceptive implants has surged in recent years, yet emerging data show a deficit of service delivery capacity and coverage for implant removals. The number of projected removals needed in the 69 FP2020 focus countries in 2018 (4.9–5.8 million) is more than twice that estimated for 2015 (2.2 million). We must proactively plan and execute high-quality implant removal services in order to fulfill the exceptional promise of implants in meeting client needs and advancing toward FP2020 goals.

Pages

  • Previous
  • Next
  • 1
  • …
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • …
  • 26
  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Adolescents and Youth (40)
    • Behavior Change Communication (42)
    • Digital Health (55)
    • Gender (45)
    • Health Systems (174)
    • Health Workers (119)
    • Primary Health Care (21)
    • Service Integration (22)
    • Surgery (13)
    • Universal Health Coverage (13)
  • Health Topics
    • COVID-19 (46)
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health (259)
    • HIV/AIDS (78)
    • Immunization/Vaccines (48)
    • Infectious Diseases (138)
    • Malaria (23)
    • Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health (212)
    • Mental Health (15)
    • Noncommunicable Diseases (26)
    • Nutrition (45)
    • Postabortion Care (18)
    • Supply Chain (15)
    • Tuberculosis (26)
    • Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (5)
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire