http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2735-7523
Figures
Abstract
Background
With the reduction of maternal mortality, maternal near miss (MNM) has been used as a complementary indicator of maternal health. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of MNM in eastern Ethiopia using an adapted sub-Saharan Africa MNM tool and compare its applicability with the original WHO MNM tool.
Methods
We applied the sub-Saharan Africa and WHO MNM criteria to 1054 women admitted with potentially life-threatening conditions (including 28 deaths) in Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital and Jugel Hospital between January 2016 and April 2017. Discharge records were examined to identify deaths or women who developed MNM according to the sub-Saharan or WHO criteria. We calculated and compared MNM and severe maternal outcome ratios. Mortality index (ratio of maternal deaths to SMO) was calculated as indicator of quality of care.
Results
The sub-Saharan Africa criteria identified 594 cases of MNM and all the 28 deaths while the WHO criteria identified 128 cases of MNM and 26 deaths. There were 7404 livebirths during the same period. This gives MNM ratios of 80 versus 17 per 1000 live births for the adapted and original WHO criteria. Mortality index was 4.5% and 16.9% in the adapted and WHO criteria respectively. The major difference between the two criteria can be attributed to eclampsia, sepsis and differences in the threshold for transfusion of blood.
Conclusion
The sub-Saharan Africa criteria identified all the MNM cases identified by the WHO criteria and all the maternal deaths. Applying the WHO criteria alone will cause under reporting of MNM cases (including maternal deaths) in this low-resource setting. The mortality index of 4.5% among women who fulfilled the adapted MNM criteria justifies labeling these women as having ‘life-threatening conditions’.
Citation: Tura AK, Zwart J, van Roosmalen J, Stekelenburg J, van den Akker T, Scherjon S (2018) Severe maternal outcomes in eastern Ethiopia: Application of the adapted maternal near miss tool. PLoS ONE 13(11): e0207350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207350
Editor: Cheryl A. Moyer, University of Michigan Medical School, UNITED STATES
Received: December 27, 2017; Accepted: October 30, 2018; Published: November 14, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Tura et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was funded by the Netherlands Organization for International Cooperation in Higher Education (Nuffic). The organization has no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis or interpretation of data or the decision to submit for publication. The findings and conclusion of the study reflect the views of the authors only.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
With the reduction of maternal mortality, the study of women who survived life-threatening complications during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum period has gained attention since the 1990s [1–3]. Severe acute maternal morbidity or maternal near miss (MNM) [1–6]—both referring to a woman surviving a clinical spectrum of severity—were used to refer to such survivors of life-threatening complications. To harmonize definition and identification of MNM, the World Health Organization (WHO) published the standard MNM tool in 2009 [7], followed by a guideline on how to apply the WHO MNM approach in 2011 [8]. According to WHO definition, MNM refers to a woman who nearly died but survived a life-threatening complication that occurred during pregnancy, childbirth or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy. Twenty-five criteria divided into three groups—clinical, laboratory based, and management based—were set as indicators for the presence of MNM [7].
The WHO MNM tool has been used in several MNM studies, including in low-income settings where the tool was found to lead to significant underreporting of serious illness [9–11]. In settings where the tool was applied without adaptation, the frequency of MNM was very low and almost equal to maternal deaths—minimizing clinical relevance of the tool [12,13]. For example, although for every maternal death, an estimated 20 maternal injury, infection, disease, or disability (including MNM) are expected [14], very low proportions are reported in several low-income settings: 1.3 in Zanzibar, 2.5 in Ghana, 1.5 in Nigeria, 6.1 in Tanzania, and 6.2 in South Africa [12,13,15–17]. But studies using adapted criteria or disease based criteria reported higher maternal near miss to mortality ratios [18,19].
The need for practical criteria for use in low-income settings was previously reported [10] and individual adaptations were suggested [9]. In order to improve the applicability of the WHO MNM tool for use in low-income settings, we developed a sub-Saharan Africa MNM tool as described previously [20]. In brief, forty-seven international experts rated the applicability of the WHO MNM criteria and suggested additional parameters over three rounds. Twenty-seven criteria (19 out of 25 original WHO criteria; and eight newly suggested ones) were agreed for use in low-income sub-Saharan Africa settings. This study presents findings from the application of the sub-Saharan Africa MNM tool in Ethiopia and discusses the differences in the applicability of this tool compared to the original WHO MNM tool.
Materials and methods
Study setting
This study was conducted from January 2016 to April 2017 in Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital (HFSUH) and Jugel Regional Hospital in Harar town. HFSUH is a tertiary referral hospital affiliated with the College of Health and Medical Sciences of Haramaya University, Ethiopia. It is the major referral hospital in the eastern part of the country serving a catchment area with a population close to 3 million. HFSUH has two major operation rooms—one for general cases and one specifically for obstetrics—and a central intensive care unit with standby generator for use during power breaks. The maternity unit, consisting of 41 beds, serves both referred and self-referred women. During the study period, the unit was run by seven consultants, eight residents, and more than 20 nurse midwives. One anesthesiologist was available in the hospital, based on a monthly rotation from the capital. Jugel Hospital is a regional general hospital found in the same town, run by the Harari Regional Health Bureau. The maternity unit was run by integrated emergency surgical officers (associate clinicians) [21] under the supervision of consultants from HFSUH. Since HFSUH is relatively well equipped (including the only neonatal intensive care unit and pediatric ward in the region), the majority of complications are referred to this hospital.
Study design and participants
In this prospective cohort study, we included all women with MNM according to the sub-Saharan Africa or original WHO MNM criteria. Identification of MNM was a two-step process—we first identified all women with potentially life-threatening conditions (PLTC) as defined by WHO (severe postpartum hemorrhage, severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, uterine rupture, severe complications of abortion, and sepsis/severe systemic infections); received critical interventions (use of blood products, laparotomy other than cesarean section); or were admitted to the intensive care unit [8]. At discharge, we then selected those who developed life-threatening complications, consisting of MNM and maternal deaths, according to the sub-Saharan Africa or original WHO MNM criteria [8,20]. Maternal near miss refers to a woman who nearly died but survived a life-threatening complication that occurred during pregnancy, childbirth or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy [7]. Severe maternal outcome includes women with life-threatening complications who survived the complications (near miss) or died. Eligible women were identified by trained research assistant nurse-midwives working in both hospitals through daily visits of obstetric ward, intensive care unit, emergency room, and gynaecology ward. Identified cases were evaluated and confirmed by the first author (AKT). Sample size was estimated based on the annual deliveries and maternal mortality ratio according to the recommendation by the WHO [22]. Considering the existing maternal mortality ratio (412) and the annual number of deliveries in both hospitals, we expected 7000 live births and 30 maternal deaths in 16 months.
Measurement and quality assessment
For all women with PLTC, or who received critical interventions, or admitted to the intensive care unit, basic identifying information (medical registration number, the underlying complication, and admission unit) were recorded daily and followed until discharge. Upon discharge, a thorough review of her medical record was conducted to collect detailed data on socio-demographic characteristics, history of morbidities, obstetric conditions, underlying complication, MNM event, treatments received, and maternal and perinatal outcomes. Information about referral status was also collected. Referred cases refers to women coming from health centers and district hospitals with existing complications. This enabled us to distinguish occurrence of MNM before or after admission—a good indicator of in hospital quality of care and referral system.
The dependent variable was presence of maternal near miss or maternal death. Maternal death was defined as a death of woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy. Maternal near miss was identified by the presence of any of the life-threatening complications listed in Table 1. Independent variables included socio-demographic characteristics (age, referral status, residence), obstetric conditions (parity, place of delivery, gravidity, antenatal care, mode of delivery), underlying medical complications, and infection. Data about the total number of deliveries was obtained from monthly hospital reports. In case of doubt and when additional information was required, attending clinicians were contacted for clarification. The overall data collection and quality of data was supervised by the first author (AKT) and two experienced researchers from the College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University. All completed questionnaires were checked for completeness and consistency before entry to the computer. Codes were used to identify each woman included in the study and no personal identifiers were included in the analysis or reporting. Access to collected data was restricted only to the research team and the questionnaire was kept in locked cabinet.
Data processing and analysis
Data were entered using EpiData v3.1 (www.epidata.dk) and IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA) was used for analysis. Descriptive statistics of study participants and indicators of MNM were analyzed. Severe maternal outcome ratio, MNM ratio, mortality index and MNM to mortality ratio were calculated. Severe maternal outcome ratio is the total number of women with life-threatening complications (MNM and maternal deaths) per 1000 live births. Similarly, MNM ratio refers to the total number of MNM per 1000 live births. Mortality index is the ratio of maternal deaths to the total number of women with life-threatening complications [5]. A lower mortality index level indicates good quality of care. The study was approved by the Institutional Health Research Review Committee of the College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Ethiopia (Ref N: C/A/R/D/01/1681/16). Since data were collected from medical charts after discharge of the women and no patient interview was planned, the need for informed consent was waived. Permission was obtained from the respective officials in the regional health bureau and participating hospitals.
Results
Of 1054 women admitted with potentially life-threatening conditions during the study period, 622 were classified as life-threatening complications by the sub-Saharan Africa criteria: 28 maternal deaths and 594 MNM. When the original WHO criteria was applied, 154 were classified as life-threatening complications: 26 maternal deaths and 128 MNM (Fig 1). During the same period, a total of 7929 deliveries and 7404 livebirths were registered in both hospitals, resulting in a maternal near miss ratio of 80 and 17 per 1000 live births according to the sub-Saharan Africa and WHO criteria respectively. The MNM ratio was 106 and 46 per 1000 livebirths in HFSUH and Jugel Hospital respectively. According to the WHO criteria, the MNM ratio was 29.4 and 5.9 per 1000 live births in HFSUH and Jugel Hospital respectively. All the 28 maternal deaths occurred in HFSUH.
1According to the sub-Saharan or WHO criteria 2World Health Organization MNM criteria 3 sub-Saharan Africa MNM criteria 4Maternal Near Miss 5Maternal Deaths.
Characteristics of participants
Majority of the study participants were 20–35 years old, received no antenatal care, and referred from other facilities. No statistically significant difference was observed between MNM and deaths except referral status, which was higher among cases of maternal deaths than the maternal near miss (Table 2).
The major difference in the number of MNM between the sub-Saharan Africa and the WHO MNM criteria can be attributed to eclampsia, sepsis, and differences in the threshold for the transfusion of blood (Table 3). The threshold in the sub-Saharan Africa is two units compared to five in the WHO criteria. Of 118 women who received only two units of blood, 87 have no other WHO inclusion criteria. Only nine women received five or more units of blood (S1 Fig). For two of the 28 maternal deaths which fulfilled the sub-Saharan African criteria (pulmonary edema and two units of blood), reported data were insufficient to fulfill the WHO criteria.
Maternal near miss indicators
The MNM ratio was 80 per 1000 live births according to the sub-Saharan Africa criteria. For every maternal death, there were 21 MNM cases resulting in a mortality index of 4.5%. For the original WHO criteria, MNM ratio was lower (17 per 1000), mortality index was much higher (16.9%) and MNM to mortality ratio was lower (4.9:1) compared to the adapted criteria (21:1). A high proportion (85.2% in the adapted and 82.5% in the original criteria) of MNM was already present on arrival or occurred within 12 hours of admission, majority (87% in the adapted and 68% in the WHO criteria) of whom were referred from other facilities. Mortality index was almost double among referred cases compared to in-hospital MNM cases in both classifications (Table 4).
Hypertensive disorders and obstetric hemorrhage were the major underlying complications in MNM and deaths. In the adapted tool, hypertensive disorders were the leading underlying complication while obstetric hemorrhage is common in the WHO criteria. Anemia was the leading contributory factor in both criteria. Details of underlying complications and associated factors are presented in Table 5.
As shown in Table 6, coverage of key process indicators ranged from 79% for the use of therapeutic antibiotics in sepsis to 95% for the use of magnesium sulphate in eclampsia. Oxytocin use among women with postpartum hemorrhage was 73%. Mortality index was found to be highest among cases of postpartum hemorrhage (12.5%); and least among sepsis (2.4%) (Table 6).
Discussion
We investigated the applicability of the sub-Saharan Africa MNM tool compared to the original WHO tool for use in low-income setting hospitals in eastern Ethiopia. Our study showed that the sub-Saharan Africa criteria identified all the maternal near miss cases identified by the WHO criteria. More importantly, it additionally identified more women with life-threatening complications (including two maternal deaths) which did not fulfil the strict WHO criteria [9,20]. The WHO recommends the use of the more severe cases to avoid burden of data collection and unnecessary inclusions of non-severe cases [8]. However, the mortality index of cases identified by the new classification is 4.5%, indicating severity of the cases.
The major difference in MNM between the two criteria can be attributed to eclampsia, sepsis and difference in the threshold for the number of blood transfusion. In this low-income setting, eclampsia is one of the major underlying cause of maternal death (mortality index of 25.7% among cases fulfilling the WHO criteria). Similarly, of 406 women who received blood products, only nine received five or more units of blood while majority of them received one (229) or two (118) units only (S1 Fig). In the presence of serious shortage of blood, having five or more units of blood for transfusion available is almost impossible in many hospitals in low-income settings [23]. Many of the conditions reported as potentially life-threatening conditions (severe postpartum hemorrhage, severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, sepsis, and ruptured uterus) are in fact life-threatening in many low-income settings [19,24–26]. In Ethiopia, death from hemorrhage and eclampsia is so common [27] that their inclusion in MNM will raise awareness to reduce preventable complications and mortality.
Our MNM ratio of 80 per 1000 live births for the adapted criteria was comparable with a previous study from Ethiopia which used the disease-based criteria (78.9) [18]. However, it is higher than findings from other studies using more comparable adapted MNM tools in Tanzania (23.6), Malawi (10.2), and Rwanda (21.5) [11,28,29]. Compared to these studies, our study was conducted in urban centers including a tertiary referral hospital where the majority of women with complications are treated. Comparing our finding of 17 per 1000 live births according to the WHO criteria with other studies using the WHO tool showed that our finding is higher than findings from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (8), Zanzibar (6.7), Nigeria (15.8) and South Africa (4.4) [12,13,17,30]. This may be related to low institutional delivery rates in our setting, where more births occur outside hospitals [31]. On the other hand, it is lower than the findings from Ghana (28.6) and Rwanda (110) [15,32]. Differences in the study population or quality of care may play a role.
The strength of our study is the use of prospective identification of cases and data collection over a long period of time. However, our findings are limited by the fact that this is the first study to apply the adapted criteria in real clinical settings. We did sub-group analysis of MNM outcomes for the adapted and the original WHO tool to minimize the limitation and compare with other studies as appropriate. Although most MNM and deaths are better identified in facilities [33,34], the denominator (live births) could be low because of high home births in Ethiopia [31]. Our study was conducted in a tertiary and regional hospital in one district and, therefore, findings may not be generalizable. We are unable to comment on timeliness of treatments and delays associated with management since the time between decision and actual treatment is rarely documented. Because of poor documentation, majority of sociodemographic characteristics (income, educational status, partner’s status, and occupation) affecting treatment seeking or outcome were not collected. Our follow up is also limited up to discharge of the women, and therefore cases occurring after discharge until 42 days may be missed—especially if not re-admitted in both hospitals.
In conclusion, the sub-Saharan Africa criteria functioned well in identifying all maternal deaths and all MNM cases identified by the WHO criteria. The tool additionally captured MNM cases—that are common causes of maternal morbidity and mortality—that were missed when applying the WHO MNM tool. Although common criteria for MNM may enable comparisons across settings, the local context must be taken into account without creating too many different adaptations of standardized criteria [9,28]. The WHO criteria failed to identify two third of women with severe acute maternal morbidity and more than one third of maternal deaths even in high-income settings, the Netherlands [35]. The need for refined MNM criteria with limited set of interventions- and organ dysfunction-based criteria was previously reported [36]. Therefore, use of the sub-Saharan Africa MNM tool should be encouraged for use in low-income settings with limited personnel and sophisticated laboratory. Similar studies are required to assess broader performance of the tool and its applicability in other low-income settings.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Differences in MNM inclusion based on threshold for blood transfusion.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207350.s001
(TIFF)
Acknowledgments
We want to thank all research assistants who participated in data collection and supervision. We also want to thank administrators of both hospitals and head of maternity units who were supportive during the data collection.
References
- 1. Stones W, Lim W, Al-Azzawi F, Kelly M. An investigation of maternal morbidity with identification of life-threatening 'near miss' episodes. Health Trends. 1991;23: 13–15. pmid:10113878
- 2. Mantel GD, Buchmann E, Rees H, Pattinson RC. Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near-miss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105: 985–990. pmid:9763050
- 3. Filippi V, Alihonou E, Mukantaganda S, Graham WJ, Ronsmans C. Near misses: maternal morbidity and mortality. The Lancet. 1998;351: 145–146.
- 4. Pattinson RC, Buchmann E, Mantel G, Schoon M, Rees H. Can enquiries into severe acute maternal morbidity act as a surrogate for maternal death enquiries? BJOG. 2003;110: 889–893. pmid:14550357
- 5. Vandecruys HI, Pattinson RC, Macdonald AP, Mantel GD. Severe acute maternal morbidity and mortality in the Pretoria Academic Complex: changing patterns over 4 years. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;102: 6–10. pmid:12039082
- 6. Pattinson RC, Hall M. Near misses: a useful adjunct to maternal death enquiries. Br Med Bull. 2003;67: 231–243. pmid:14711767
- 7. Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC, WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications. Maternal near miss—towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23: 287–296. pmid:19303368
- 8.
World Health Organization. Evaluating the Quality of Care for Severe Pregnancy Complications: The Who Near-Miss Approach for Maternal Health. 2011, World Health Organization, Geneva.
- 9. Nelissen E, Mduma E, Broerse J, Ersdal H, Evjen-Olsen B, van Roosmalen J, et al. Applicability of the WHO maternal near miss criteria in a low-resource setting. PLoS One. 2013;8: e61248. pmid:23613821
- 10. Spector J. Practical criteria for maternal near miss needed for low-income settings. The Lancet. 2013;382: 504–505.
- 11. van den Akker T, Beltman J, Leyten J, Mwagomba B, Meguid T, Stekelenburg J, et al. The WHO maternal near miss approach: consequences at Malawian District level. PLoS One. 2013;8: e54805. pmid:23372770
- 12. Herklots T, van Acht L, Meguid T, Franx A, Jacod B. Severe maternal morbidity in Zanzibar's referral hospital: Measuring the impact of in-hospital care. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0181470. pmid:28832665
- 13. Oladapo O, Adetoro O, Ekele B, Chama C, Etuk S, Aboyeji A, et al. When getting there is not enough: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 998 maternal deaths and 1451 near-misses in public tertiary hospitals in a low-income country. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2016;123: 928–938.
- 14.
Fortney J, Smith J. Measuring maternal morbidity. In: Berer M, Ravindran T, editors. Safe Motherhood Initiatives: Critical Issues.: Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1999.
- 15. Tuncalp O, Hindin MJ, Adu-Bonsaffoh K, Adanu RM. Assessment of maternal near-miss and quality of care in a hospital-based study in Accra, Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123: 58–63. pmid:23830870
- 16. Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Roost M, Abeid M, Nystrom L, Essen B. Maternal near-miss and death and their association with caesarean section complications: a cross-sectional study at a university hospital and a regional hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14: 244-2393-14-244.
- 17. Soma-Pillay P, Pattinson RC, Langa-Mlambo L, Nkosi BS, Macdonald AP. Maternal near miss and maternal death in the Pretoria Academic Complex, South Africa: A population-based study. S Afr Med J. 2015;105: 578–563. pmid:26428756
- 18. Gebrehiwot Y, Tewolde B. Improving maternity care in Ethiopia through facility based review of maternal deaths and near misses. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2014;127, Supplement 1: S29–S34.
- 19. van den Akker T, van Rhenen J, Mwagomba B, Lommerse K, Vinkhumbo S, van Roosmalen J. Reduction of severe acute maternal morbidity and maternal mortality in Thyolo District, Malawi: the impact of obstetric audit. PLoS One. 2011;6: e20776. pmid:21677788
- 20. Tura AK, Stekelenburg J, Scherjon SA, Zwart J, van den Akker T, van Roosmalen J, et al. Adaptation of the WHO maternal near miss tool for use in sub-Saharan Africa: an International Delphi study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17: 445-017-1640-x.
- 21. Mullan F, Frehywot S. Non-physician clinicians in 47 sub-Saharan African countries. The Lancet. 2007;370: 2158–2163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60785-5.
- 22.
World Health Organization. Beyond the Numbers. Reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer. 2004, World Health Organization, Geneva.
- 23. Bates I, Chapotera GK, McKew S, van den Broek N. Maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: the contribution of ineffective blood transfusion services. BJOG. 2008;115: 1331–1339. pmid:18823485
- 24. Strand RT, Tumba P, Niekowal J, Bergstrom S. Audit of cases with uterine rupture: a process indicator of quality of obstetric care in Angola. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14: 55–62.
- 25. Nakimuli A, Nakubulwa S, Kakaire O, Osinde MO, Mbalinda SN, Kakande N, et al. The burden of maternal morbidity and mortality attributable to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a prospective cohort study from Uganda. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016;16: 205. pmid:27492552
- 26. De Mucio B, Abalos E, Cuesta C, Carroli G, Serruya S, Giordano D, et al. Maternal near miss and predictive ability of potentially life-threatening conditions at selected maternity hospitals in Latin America. Reproductive Health. 2016;13: 134. pmid:27814759
- 27.
Ethiopian Public Health Institute Center for Public Health Emergency Management (PHEM). National Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) Annual Report, 2009 EFY. 2018.
- 28. Kalisa R, Rulisa S, van den Akker T, van Roosmalen J. Maternal Near Miss and quality of care in a rural Rwandan hospital. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016;16: 324. pmid:27769193
- 29. Nelissen EJ, Mduma E, Ersdal HL, Evjen-Olsen B, van Roosmalen JJ, Stekelenburg J. Maternal near miss and mortality in a rural referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13: 141. pmid:23826935
- 30. Liyew EF, Yalew AW, Afework MF, Essen B. Incidence and causes of maternal near-miss in selected hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0179013. pmid:28586355
- 31.
Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key Indicators Report. 2016.
- 32. Rulisa S, Umuziranenge I, Small M, van Roosmalen J. Maternal near miss and mortality in a tertiary care hospital in Rwanda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15: 203-015-0619-8.
- 33. Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Gandaho T, Graham W, Alihonou E, Santos P. Women's reports of severe (near-miss) obstetric complications in Benin. Stud Fam Plann. 2000;31: 309–324. pmid:11198068
- 34. Stewart MK, Stanton CK, Festin M, Jacobson N. Issues in measuring maternal morbidity: lessons from the Philippines Safe Motherhood Survey Project. Stud Fam Plann. 1996;27: 29–35. pmid:8677521
- 35. Witteveen T, de Koning I, Bezstarosti H, van den Akker T, van Roosmalen J, Bloemenkamp KW. Validating the WHO Maternal Near Miss Tool in a high-income country. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95: 106–111. pmid:26456014
- 36. Witteveen T, Bezstarosti H, de Koning I, Nelissen E, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J, et al. Validating the WHO maternal near miss tool: comparing high- and low-resource settings. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17: 194-017-1370-0.