Original articleThe Economic Model of Retinopathy of Prematurity (EcROP) Screening and Treatment: Mexico and the United States
Section snippets
Methods
We performed a cost-utility and cost-benefit analysis for implementation of an ideal ROP screening and treatment program in both the United States and Mexico. We incorporated sensitivity analysis and measured for the relative impact of this intervention by using commonly accepted parameters for cost-effectiveness.
In addition to using published data, EcROP gathered country-specific economic data using local care standard-of-care clinical protocols combined with economic data from face-to-face
Results
We report the results in 2014 US dollars, discounted at 3%. Labor and caregiver data are gender adjusted when possible. The base case analysis of our model revealed that ideal national screening and treatment programs in Mexico and the United States would be extremely cost-effective and have a substantially greater net monetary benefit when compared to current practice (Table 2). The ICER of a national program over current practice calculates to a negative value for both Mexico and the United
Discussion
The EcROP model analyzes the economic impact of ROP screening and treatment at a national and societal level for the designated country or economic region. The EcROP face-to-face interviews and fieldwork gathered relevant data and included a sensitivity analysis that provides socioeconomic information about both direct and indirect cost data for the regions studied. Information from both the United States (an example of a developed nation) and Mexico (an example of a middle-income developing
References (38)
Retinopathy of prematurity: a global perspective of the epidemics, population of babies at risk and implications for control
Early Hum Dev
(2008)- et al.
A systematic analysis of the off-label use of bevacizumab for severe retinopathy of prematurity
Am J Ophthalmol
(2009) - et al.
The magnitude and cost of global blindness: an increasing problem that can be alleviated
Am J Ophthalmol
(2003) - et al.
The societal burden of blindness secondary to retinopathy of prematurity in Lima, Peru
Am J Ophthalmol
(2012) - et al.
Cost-utility analysis of screening and laser treatment of retinopathy of prematurity
J AAPOS
(2009) - et al.
Mechanisms and management of retinopathy of prematurity
N Engl J Med
(2012) - et al.
The incidence and course of retinopathy of prematurity: findings from the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study
Pediatrics
(2005) American Academy of Ophthalmology: American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity
Pediatrics
(2006)Manejo de la retinopatia del recien nacido prematuro
- et al.
National Neonatology Forum of India (NNF) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Retinopathy of Prematurity
Beyond newborn survival paper 3. Preterm-associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010
Pediatr Res
Characteristics of infants with severe retinopathy of prematurity in countries with low, moderate, and high levels of development: implications for screening programs
Pediatrics
Very-low-birth-weight infant outcomes in 11 South American NICUS
J Perinatol
Retinopathy of prematurity screening and treatment cost in Brazil
Rev Panam Salud Publica
Human Development Report, 2015
Multicenter trial of cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity: ophthalmological outcomes at 10 years
Arch Ophthalmol
Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
JAMA
Cited by (30)
Harnessing the therapeutic potential of the stem cell secretome in neonatal diseases
2023, Seminars in PerinatologyAssessment and management of retinopathy of prematurity in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
2022, Progress in Retinal and Eye ResearchCitation Excerpt :We believe that a physician input is necessary as a fail-safe mechanism. Failing to address these issues may result in severe disease being missed, which invariably leads to blindness for the child (CRYO-ROP, 2001), and impact in terms of quality of life (ROTHSCHILD; RUSS; BRENNAN et al., 2016). As with telemedicine and screening in general, the attending physician may also be exposed to medicolegal implications if severe disease is missed. (
Pharmacologic interventions for the prevention and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity
2019, Seminars in PerinatologyCitation Excerpt :ROP is one of the leading causes of childhood blindness worldwide and is currently estimated to cause 20,000 cases of blindness or severe visual impairment per annum1. ROP is a lifetime disease with significant deleterious role on other ocular diseases (glaucoma, amblyopia, strabismus, myopia, retinal detachment) and huge financial and emotional burdens to families and societies.2 The two determinant factors for ROP are immature retinal vessels due to prematurity and oxygen therapy causing oxidative injury (Fig. 1); and their interactions are influenced by several factors including oxidative distress, intermittent hypoxia (IH), inflammation, dysregulated growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and many other factors that contribute to ROP risk and severity.3
Supplemental Material available at AJO.com.