Comment

How primary health care can make universal health coverage a reality, ensure healthy lives, and promote wellbeing for all

Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and Global Health Security (GHS) activities encompass mitigation of risks to health and well-being rights posed by infectious disease outbreaks and facilitated by health promotion (HP) activities. This case study investigated Bangladesh's readiness and capacity to ‘prevent, detect and respond’ to such outbreaks of an epidemic/pandemic nature. A rapid review of relevant documents, key informant interviews with policymakers/practitioners, and a deliberative dialogue with a crisscross of stakeholders were used to identify challenges and opportunities for ‘synergy’ among these streams of activities. Findings reveal conceptual ambiguity among respondents about the scope of the three `agendas and their inter-linkages. They perceived the synergy between UHC and GHS superfluous and were obsessed with losing their respective constituencies and resources. Poor coordination among the focal agencies in field activities, lack of supporting infrastructure, and shortage of human and financial resources posed additional challenges for better pandemic/epidemic preparation in future.

This study, “Researching the UHC-GHS-HP Triangle in Bangladesh,” was funded by the Wellcome Trust, UK

Universal health coverage is one of the WHO End TB Strategy priority interventions and could be achieved—particularly in low-income and middle-income countries—through the expansion of primary health care. We evaluated the effects of one of the largest primary health-care programmes in the world, the Brazilian Family Health Strategy (FHS), on tuberculosis morbidity and mortality using a nationwide cohort of 7·3 million individuals over a 10-year study period.

We analysed individuals who entered the 100 Million Brazilians Cohort during the period Jan 1, 2004, to Dec 31, 2013, and compared residents in municipalities with no FHS coverage with residents in municipalities with full FHS coverage. We used a cohort design with multivariable Poisson regressions, adjusted for all relevant demographic and socioeconomic variables and weighted with inverse probability of treatment weighting, to estimate the effect of FHS on tuberculosis incidence, mortality, cure, and case fatality. We also performed a range of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

FHS exposure was associated with lower tuberculosis incidence (rate ratio [RR] 0·78, 95% CI 0·72–0·84) and mortality (0·72, 0·55–0·94), and was positively associated with tuberculosis cure rates (1·04, 1·00–1·08). FHS was also associated with a decrease in tuberculosis case-fatality rates, although this was not statistically significant (RR 0·84, 95% CI 0·55–1·30). FHS associations were stronger among the poorest individuals for all the tuberculosis indicators.

Community-based primary health care could strongly reduce tuberculosis morbidity and mortality and decrease the unequal distribution of the tuberculosis burden in the most vulnerable populations. During the current marked rise in global poverty due to the COVID-19 pandemic, investments in primary health care could help protect against the expected increases in tuberculosis incidence worldwide and contribute to the attainment of the End TB Strategy goals.

TB Modelling and Analysis Consortium (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), Wellcome Trust, and Brazilian Ministry of Health.

For the Portuguese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.