Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 388, Issue 10057, 5–11 November 2016, Pages 2307-2320
The Lancet

Series
Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31333-2Get rights and content

Summary

To improve maternal health requires action to ensure quality maternal health care for all women and girls, and to guarantee access to care for those outside the system. In this paper, we highlight some of the most pressing issues in maternal health and ask: what steps can be taken in the next 5 years to catalyse action toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goal target of less than 70 maternal deaths per 100 000 livebirths by 2030, with no single country exceeding 140? What steps can be taken to ensure that high-quality maternal health care is prioritised for every woman and girl everywhere? We call on all stakeholders to work together in securing a healthy, prosperous future for all women. National and local governments must be supported by development partners, civil society, and the private sector in leading efforts to improve maternal–perinatal health. This effort means dedicating needed policies and resources, and sustaining implementation to address the many factors influencing maternal health-care provision and use. Five priority actions emerge for all partners: prioritise quality maternal health services that respond to the local specificities of need, and meet emerging challenges; promote equity through universal coverage of quality maternal health services, including for the most vulnerable women; increase the resilience and strength of health systems by optimising the health workforce, and improve facility capability; guarantee sustainable finances for maternal–perinatal health; and accelerate progress through evidence, advocacy, and accountability.

Introduction

Globally, the maternal mortality ratio nearly halved between 1990 and 2015. However, progress was patchy, with only nine countries with an initial maternal mortality ratio greater than 100 achieving the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5 target of 75% reduction.1 26 countries made no progress, and in 12 countries—including the USA— maternal mortality ratios increased.1 A woman’s lifetime risk of dying as a result of pregnancy and childbirth remains more than 100 times higher in sub-Saharan Africa than in high-income countries.1 Deaths of newborn babies have also declined at a slower rate than those of older infants and children, and stillbirths remain high.2, 3, 4

Yet maternity service use has increased substantially in the past 10 years since the 2006 Lancet maternal health Series: three-quarters of women now deliver with a skilled birth attendant and two-thirds receive at least four antenatal care visits worldwide.5, 6 This mismatch between burden and coverage exposes a crucial gap in quality of care. Millions of women receive services that are delayed, inadequate, unnecessary, or harmful,7, 8, 9 minimising the opportunity for health gains for both mothers and babies.

In parallel to the women accessing services but receiving poor-quality care, millions of women and adolescents who undertake their journey through pregnancy and childbirth outside the health system are left behind from the progress in coverage. They represent a vulnerable population facing multiple challenges that arise from their individual circumstances. Statistics show a growing divergence within and between countries in coverage of maternity services for women, mirrored by a doubling of the gap in levels of maternal mortality between the best and worst performing countries in the past 20 years.10

The dual streams of poor-quality or inaccessible care coexist everywhere—a universality that spans countries of low, middle and high income, including fragile and conflict-affected nations; and those considered economically and politically stable. Every woman, everywhere, has a right to access quality maternity services, and the benefits of such access extend to the fetus, newborn babies, children, and adolescents. Effectively addressing maternal health requires integrated programming that takes into account these inextricable linkages, and requires connections with the broader social and political context in which women live (appendix). The breadth and complexity of such linkages are reflected across the Lancet Series and other publications on stillbirths, newborn babies, midwifery, and adolescent health.

In this paper, we highlight the most pressing issues in maternal health and ask two questions: what actions can be taken in the next 5 years to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target of a global maternal mortality ratio less than 70 maternal deaths per 100 000 livebirths by 2030, with no single country having a maternal mortality ratio greater than 140 maternal deaths per 100 000 livebirths? What steps can be taken to ensure that high-quality maternal health care is prioritised for every woman (including adolescents) and baby everywhere, supporting the vision of the Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s, and Adolescent Health?

We consulted experts, reviewed the literature, and carefully analysed the five papers of this Series; our overall themes are to improve maternal health, ensure the quality of maternal health care for all women and adolescents, and guarantee access to care for those left behind who are most vulnerable. These themes underlie the priority areas for action summarised in panel 1.

Key messages

  • The MDG5 target to reduce maternal mortality by 75% was not achieved. The gap between countries with highest and lowest mortality has increased despite increased use of maternity care.

  • This mismatch exposes an important gap in quality of care—delayed, inadequate, unnecessary, or even harmful services—minimising the opportunity for health gains for mothers and babies.

  • In parallel, millions of pregnant women and adolescents are left behind from the progress in coverage.

  • Poor-quality and inaccessible care coexist everywhere—in countries of low, middle, and high income; in fragile nations; and in those considered economically and politically stable.

  • Five priorities require immediate attention to catalyse action and support the vision of global initiatives to achieve the SDG3 global target of a maternal mortality ratio of less than 70: (1) prioritise quality maternal health services that respond to local specificities of need and meet emerging challenges; (2) promote equity through universal coverage of quality maternal health services, including for the most vulnerable women; (3) increase resilience and strength of health systems by optimising the health workforce and improving facility capability; (4) guarantee sustainable financing for maternal–perinatal health; and (5) accelerate progress through evidence, advocacy, and accountability.

  • Crucial to achieving equity will be the growing pressure on national and regional governments in even the poorest countries to provide universal health coverage.

  • As conditions evolve, and women’s preferences change and diversify, these priorities will require strong partnerships between the maternal health community and those addressing reproductive, newborn, child, and adolescent health care more broadly; those focused on the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases, malnutrition, infectious diseases, and mental ill-health; and those focused on other SDG targets, from ending poverty to building resilient infrastructure.

  • To achieve and accelerate these actions will result in benefits for women, newborn babies, and stillbirths, that will extend to children, families, and the community, in this generation and the next.

Section snippets

Context-appropriate implementation strategies

Prevention of unwanted or poorly timed pregnancy is the first step. By ensuring access to modern contraceptives for all women and adolescents, everywhere, this step could reduce maternal deaths by an estimated 29%.11 In 2015, 12% of women had unmet need for contraceptives,12 and approximately 7·9% of maternal deaths were attributed to unsafe abortion.13 Thus, safe abortion services are also important.

For pregnant women continuing to term, Souza’s obstetric transition14 extends the concept of

Priority 2: Promote equity through universal coverage

Women everywhere fail to seek care for numerous reasons, including sociocultural factors such as gender inequality, location because of remoteness or conflict, and financial constraints.40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 These three major access barriers require immediate attention.

Gender inequality reflects power imbalances between men and women both within the household and in the wider societal context,47 and is both defined and perpetuated by sociocultural norms. Documented to varying degrees in

Priority 3: Increase the resilience and strength of health systems

In view of the existence of unserved populations, and changing and diverging maternal health needs, an increase of the strength and resilience of national health systems to respond at scale with quality care, and in a sustainable manner, is urgently needed. Resilience demands mechanisms to ensure essential health services are delivered, regardless of the stress on the system; and must include the capacity to address the special needs of women, adolescents, and newborn babies,68, 76 even as

Capture expanded domestic fiscal space for maternal health

The investment case for health financing, particularly for investing in the health and education of women, has been clearly made by a Lancet Commission, WHO, and others.84, 85, 86 Additional investments in high maternal and child mortality countries would yield high rates of return, producing up to nine-times the economic and social benefit by 2035.86 Yet a real resource gap remains.87 During the 2013–35 timeframe, Stenberg and colleagues86 project that an additional investment of US$72·1

Develop improved metrics and support implementation research

Research is an essential component of the post-2015 maternal health agenda. Yet research funding is not commensurate with need: only 35% of published research in 2011–14 addressed these problems in high-burden countries. Nonetheless, the number of research papers on maternal health in high-burden countries doubled in 2011–14 compared with the previous 5 years.103

On the basis of recent literature reviews,104, 105 the five papers in this Series,7, 8, 9, 10, 75 and discussions with the Series’

Moving forward

Building on the priorities identified in this Series (panel), interventions known to reduce maternal death (figure 1), and potential implementation priorities by stage of maternal mortality ratio reduction (panel 2), figure 3 schematically represents an action plan for local, national, regional, and global stakeholders to accelerate progress toward improving maternal health. It emphasises that sustained efforts must be defined and initiated at local and national levels, as well as complemented

Conclusions

This Series, following up on the 2006 Lancet maternal survival Series and building on recent related publications (including those on midwifery, newborns, stillbirths, and adolescents), suggests two fundamental issues that need to be addressed to improve maternal health: to ensure the quality of maternal health care for all women, and to guarantee access to care for those left behind or those who are most vulnerable. In addition, this Series describes, organises, and analyses a large body of

References (133)

  • M Desai et al.

    Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2007)
  • B Zaba et al.

    Effect of HIV infection on pregnancy-related mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: secondary analyses of pooled community-based data from the network for Analysing Longitudinal Population-based HIV/AIDS data on Africa (ALPHA)

    Lancet

    (2013)
  • JE Lawn et al.

    Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • MH Forouzanfar et al.

    Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Lancet

    (2015)
  • GB Kyomuhendo

    Low use of rural maternity services in Uganda: impact of women’s status, traditional beliefs and limited resources

    Reprod Health Matters

    (2003)
  • A Prost et al.

    Women’s groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Lancet

    (2013)
  • M Rosato et al.

    Community participation: lessons for maternal, newborn, and child health

    Lancet

    (2008)
  • SB Rifkin

    Paradigms lost: toward a new understanding of community participation in health programmes

    Acta Trop

    (1996)
  • A Costello et al.

    An alternative strategy to reduce maternal mortality

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • C Menendez et al.

    Ebola crisis: the unequal impact on women and children’s health

    Lancet Glob Health

    (2015)
  • B McKinnon et al.

    Who benefits from removing user fees for facility-based delivery services? Evidence on socioeconomic differences from Ghana, Senegal and Sierra Leone

    Soc Sci Med

    (2015)
  • J Campbell

    The route to effective coverage is through the health worker: there are no shortcuts

    Lancet

    (2013)
  • DE Bloom et al.

    The effect of health on economic growth: a production function approach

    World Dev

    (2004)
  • K Stenberg et al.

    Advancing social and economic development by investing in women’s and children’s health: a new Global Investment Framework

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • H Desalegn et al.

    The Global Financing Facility: country investments for every woman, adolescent, and child

    Lancet

    (2015)
  • J Borghi et al.

    Mobilising financial resources for maternal health

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • JL Dieleman et al.

    Development assistance for health: past trends, associations, and the future of international financial flows for health

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • L Arregoces et al.

    Countdown to 2015: changes in official development assistance to reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, and assessment of progress between 2003 and 2012

    Lancet Glob Health

    (2015)
  • AD Usher

    Nordic countries divided over Global Financing Facility

    Lancet

    (2015)
  • WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, United Nations Population Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2015....
  • D Chou et al.

    Ending preventable maternal and newborn mortality and stillbirths

    BMJ

    (2015)
  • The millennium development goals report 2014

    (2014)
  • World health statistics 2015

    (2015)
  • S Miller et al.

    Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • OMR Campbell et al.

    The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • D Shaw et al.

    Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: can health systems support woman-centred care?

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • W Graham et al.

    Diversity and divergence: the dynamic burden of poor maternal health

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • The millennium development goals report 2015

    (2015)
  • JP Souza et al.

    Obstetric transition: the pathway towards ending preventable maternal deaths

    BJOG

    (2014)
  • ZS Lassi et al.

    The interconnections between maternal and newborn health—evidence and implications for policy

    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med

    (2013)
  • Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Lancet

    (2015)
  • LE Murray-Kolb et al.

    Maternal mortality, child mortality, perinatal mortality, child cognition, and estimates of prevalence of anemia due to iron deficiency

    (2012)
  • SL Pollard et al.

    Estimating the impact of interventions on cause-specific maternal mortality: a Delphi approach

    BMC Public Health

    (2013)
  • B Brabin et al.

    The contribution of malaria

  • NN Kyei et al.

    Quality of antenatal care in Zambia: a national assessment

    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

    (2012)
  • M Morais et al.

    How often are late preterm births the result of non-evidence based practices: analysis from a retrospective cohort study at two tertiary referral centres in a nationalised healthcare system

    BJOG

    (2013)
  • JM Belizan et al.

    Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates

    Epidemiology

    (2007)
  • PMNCH. Essential interventions, commodities and guidelines for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health....
  • Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: a guide for midwives and doctors

    (2007)
  • A Merién et al.

    Multidisciplinary team training in a simulation setting for acute obstetric emergencies: a systematic review

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2010)
  • Cited by (286)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text