Abstract
The tripling of the world’s population growth since 1960 has received little public attention the past decade. Six reasons for the silence around this subject constitute a “perfect storm”. The first five are: visibility of actual fertility decline in the developed countries as well as a number of the developing ones; well justified attention to the impact of high levels of consumption on the environment; an implicit welcome by conservative political and religious forces to reduced needs for family planning; the tragedy of AIDS dominating international health concerns; and the 1994 Cairo conference’s focus on examples of coercive family planning while nearly ignoring the coercion of women forced into unwanted childbearing. These five relatively new developments have been supported by standard demographic theory containing an assumption that couples naturally want many children, making it difficult to see the many barriers blocking women’s options to manage their own childbearing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Technically, “population” refers to growth, decline, migration, and mortality. In this paper the word is being used in its most common meaning, the one subject area that is less discussed, population growth.
In this paper, fertility is used in the demographic sense, meaning the number of children born to a woman, in contrast to the meaning of fertility in biological terms, which is the ability to reproduce.
The 10 countries of the Nile basin are Burundi, Congo, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda
References
All-Party Parliamentary Group on Population. (2007). Development and Reproductive Health. Return of the population factor: Its impact on the millennium development goals. Report of U.K. Parliamentary hearings in 2006. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Available at: http://www.appg-popdevrh.org.uk.
Bernstein, S., & Hansen, C. J., (2006). Public choices, private decisions: Sexual and reproductive health and the millennium development goals. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Birdsall, N., Kelly A. C., & Sinding S. (Eds.). (2001). Population matters: Demographic change, economic growth, and poverty in the third world. London: Oxford University Press.
Blanc, A. K., & Tsui, A. O. (2005). The dilemma of past success: Insiders’ views on the future of the international family planning movement. Studies in Family Planning, 36(4), 263.
Brasted, M. (2007). Protest in the media. Peace Review, 17(4), 383–388.
Campbell, M. M. (1998). Schools of thought: An analysis of interest groups influential in international population policy. Population and Environment, 19(6), 487–512.
Campbell, M. (2006). Consumer behavior and contraceptive decisions: Resolving a decades-long puzzle. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 32(4), 241–244.
Campbell, M., Salin-Hodoglugil, N., & Potts, M. (2006). Barriers to fertility regulation: A review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning, 37(2), 87–98.
Cleland, J. (2006). Oral testimony in U.K. APPG Parliamentary Hearings. May 8, 2006. Transcripts available at: http://www.appg-popdevrh.org.uk.
Cleland, J., & Sinding, S. (2005). Viewpoint: What would Malthus say about AIDS in Africa? Lancet, 366(9500), 1899–1901.
Fotso, J.-C. Dr. (2006). The African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Kenya. Oral evidence to All Party Parliamentary Group on Population, Development and Reproductive Health, June 2006 (p. 6). Transcripts available at: http://www.appg-popdevrh.org.uk.
Knodel, J., & Woogsith, M. (1991). Family size and children’s education in Thailand: Evidence from a national sample. Demography, 28, 119–131.
Lutz, W., Sanderson, W. C., & Scherbov, S. (Eds). (2001). The end of world population growth. Nature, 412, 543–545.
Noelle-Newman, E. (1984). Spiral of silence. Public opinion – our social skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Notestein, F. W. (1953). Economic problems of population change. Proceedings of the eighth international conference of agricultural economists (pp. 13–31). Oxford University Press: London.
Potts, M. (1997). Sex and the birth rate: Human biology, demographic change and access to fertility-regulation methods. Population and Development Review, 23(1), 1–39.
Potts, M. (2003). Two pills, two paths: A tale of gender bias. Endeavor, 27, 127–130.
Potts, M., & Campbell, M. M. (2005). Reverse gear: Dependence on a disappearing paradigm. Journal of Reproduction and Contraception, 16(3), 179–186.
Rutstein, S. O. (2005). Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: Evidence from the demographic and health surveys. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 89 Suppl (1), S7–24.
Sinding, S. (2006). Oral testimony in U.K. APPG Parliamentary Hearings. May 8, 2006. Transcripts available at: http://www.appg-popdevrh.org.uk.
Sokka, L. (2004). Population network newsletter, Popnet No. 36, Autumn 2004, IIASA, p. 2; and Sir David King Oral evidence to APPG Pop Dev RH 3rd July 2006 (p. 15).
UK DfID. (2006). Written evidence to All Party Parliamentary Group on Population, Development and Reproductive Health, March 2006 (p.16). Available at: http://www.appg-popdevrh.org.uk.
United Nations Economic and Social Affairs. (2005). World population prospects; The 2004 revision. Vol. 1: Comprehensive tables. (ST/E$SA/SER A/244) New York, United Nations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, M. Why the silence on population?. Popul Environ 28, 237–246 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-007-0054-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-007-0054-5