CFIR Factors and Subfactors | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ServiceDelivery | Political andFinancialCommitment | Planning andGuidance | Coordination | ExternalChampions | Systems Strength and Readiness | ||
Growth inFP ClientVolumeb, No. (%) | State BudgetLine Item forFP Disbursed,US$ (%) | HIIs Includedin State AOPc, No. | State-LedCoordinationPlatforms RegularlyOperating, No. | Advocacy GroupsConstituted, Registered,Operating Independentof TCI | FacilitiesReportingContraceptiveStock-outs, %d | FacilitiesReportingFP/AYSRH Datain Last 12Months, %(Lowest)d | |
State A | +46,923 (+91) | 390,385 (79) | 9 (SD, DG,Advocacy,and MEL) | 7 State TWGs, all includeLGA participation | ACG, IFFe | >10 | 70–90 |
State B | +32,683 (+15) | 506,622 (126) | 7 (SD, DG,Advocacy) | 7 State TWGs, all include LGAparticipation; Partner CoordinationPlatform | ACG, IFFe | <10 | >90 |
State C | +22,270 (+50) | 187,010 (58) | 4 (SD, MEL) | 1 State Reproductive Health TWGincludes LGA participation; StateTechnical Advisory Committeee | ACGe, IFFe | >10 | 50–70 |
Abbreviations: ACG, advocacy core group; AOP, annual operational plan; AYSRH, adolescent and youth sexual and reproductive health; DG, demand generation; FP, family planning; IFF, interfaith forum; LGA, local government area; MEL, monitoring, evaluation, and learning; SD, service delivery; TCI, The Challenge Initiative; TWG, technical working group.
↵aUnless otherwise noted, all data are from start of states' TCI partnership implementation through June 2021.
↵bFrom government service statistics (health management information system).
↵cFrom most recent state Annual Operational Plan/budget: HIIs included are implemented across all state LGAs.
↵dData from states’ quarterly review of performance.
↵eNot independently constituted.