Logistic Regression Analysisa Showing the Interaction Effect of City Type and Program Exposure on Modern Contraceptive Method Use Among FTPs
| % mCPR | Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model I | Model II | Model III | ||
| Non-pilot city | ||||
| No exposure through ASHA | 30.2 | Reference | ||
| Exposure through ASHA | 35.2 | 1.40 (0.78, 2.50) | ||
| Pilot city | ||||
| No exposure through ASHA | 36.4 | 1.36 (0.88, 2.11) | ||
| Exposure through ASHA | 40.7 | 1.61b (1.04, 2.48) | ||
| Non-pilot city | ||||
| No exposure through SDP | 29.7 | Reference | ||
| Exposure through SDP | 33.7 | 1.33 (0.76, 2.32) | ||
| Pilot City | ||||
| No exposure through SDP | 35.6 | 1.40 (0.87, 2.26) | ||
| Exposure through SDP | 43.8 | 1.84b (1.09, 3.11) | ||
| No exposure to ASHA or SDP | ||||
| Non-pilot city | 30.0 | Reference | ||
| Pilot city | 35.1 | 1.31 (0.75, 2.31) | ||
| Exposure to ASHA only | ||||
| Non-pilot city | 28.8 | 0.86 (0.32, 2.34) | ||
| Pilot city | 36.4 | 1.40 (0.77, 2.53) | ||
| Exposure to SDP only | ||||
| Non-pilot city | 30.3 | 1.01 (0.51, 2.03) | ||
| Pilot city | 40.2 | 1.53 (0.75, 3.13) | ||
| Exposure to ASHA and SDP | ||||
| Non-pilot city | 38.4 | 1.74 (0.84, 3.63) | ||
| Pilot city | 45.8 | 1.90b (1.03, 3.51) | ||
Abbreviations: ASHA, accredited social health activist; FTP, first-time parent; mCPR, modern contraceptive prevalence rate; SDP, service delivery point.
a Each model was adjusted for age of women, marital duration, education, caste, religion, household wealth, and working status.
b P<.05.
Source: Output Tracking Survey, 2019.