Study and Assessed Quality | Study Characteristics | Study Intention | Outcomes Related to Reproductive Health | Intervention Impact Resultsa |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fuentes-Afflickb (2006)20 | Design: Cross-sectional survey | To compare effect of state of residence and immigration status on the use of PNC among Hispanic women in CA, NY, and FL compared to U.S. born citizens in NY after 1996 PRWORA was imposed, which prohibited using federal Medicaid funds for undocumented immigrants for publicly funded services. CA and NY continued to provide services with nonfederal resources; FL fully adopted PRWORA measures |
Use of prenatal care services
|
|
Population: Postpartum Hispanic women (aged 17 years and older) (64% undocumented) | ||||
Location: USA (CA, NY, and FL) | ||||
Raheelb (2012)21 | Design: Cross-sectional survey |
To measure effect of health subsidy on uptake of contraception among refugees, who were assigned to 2 NGOs:
|
|
|
Population: Currently married Afghan female refugees (aged 15–49 years) and their families | ||||
Location: Karachi, Pakistan | ||||
Purdinc (2008)22 | Design: Secondary analysis |
To reduce maternal mortality among Afghan refugees in the Hangu district of Pakistan
|
|
|
Population: Afghan female refugees (N=96,300 distributed in 11 refugee camps) | ||||
Location: Refugee camps in Hangu district, Pakistan | ||||
Truppab (2019)23 | Design: Mixed-method, 2 cross-sectional post-intervention surveys (HS vs. CS) | To determine if program was enabling access to essential primary health care services for the most vulnerable populations residing in catchment areas heavily affected by the Syrian crisis and determined through various indicators obtained through HS or CS | Use of FP, ANC, and delivery care services |
|
Population: Lebanese and Syrian refugee women (aged 18–50 years) and caretakers of minors (both genders) | ||||
Location: Lebanon | ||||
Tousawb (2017)24 | Design: Qualitative interviews post-intervention (n=22); secondary data analysis of SARP records (N=81) |
To document experiences of women who accessed SARP:
|
|
|
Population: Migrant and refugee women from Burmese communities | ||||
Location: Northern Thailand | ||||
Tousawb (2018)25 |
Design: In-depth qualitative interviews (n=16) Secondary analysis of program records (N=918) |
To provide early MA in low-resource and legally restricted setting Trained social workers and counselors (network providers) on counseling and provision of early MA
|
|
|
Population: Female refugees and migrants from Burma with self-reported pregnancy of 9 weeks or less | ||||
Location: Thailand-Burma border | ||||
McGinnd (2006)26 | Design: Cross-sectional post-intervention survey with RHG-exposed and nonexposed refugees |
To increase literacy skills, knowledge of RH, and use of RHS available in the camps
|
|
Difference between before vs. after of having ever spoken to their partners or family members about (before vs. after)e:
|
Population: Female refugees from Liberia and Sierra Leone, either illiterate or with up to 2 years of formal education (N=2,325) | ||||
Location: Guinea | ||||
Rosenbergd (2017)27 | Design: Qualitative study with focus groups |
To train refugees engaged in sex work to become peer educators to meet the RH needs of refugees performing sex work
|
|
|
Population: Female refugees engaged in sex work (N=50 peer educators) | ||||
Location: Kampala, Uganda | ||||
Howardb (2011)28 | Design: Cross-sectional post-intervention survey |
To improve RH of refugee women, refugee providers created RHG, which was integrated into local health system |
| Nonsignificant differences reported in outcomes between women in intervention group vs. those who were not |
Population: Female refugees (aged 15–49 years) from Sierra Leone and Liberia living in 48 refugee camps | ||||
Location: Guinea Forest Region | ||||
Stevensb (2018)29 | Design: Mixed-method study with surveys and focus groups |
To increase FA uptake and decrease NTD incidence among migrant and refugee women
|
|
|
Population: Pregnant female migrant and refugees seeking care (N=371) and HCWs (N=100) | ||||
Location: Thailand-Myanmar border |
Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; CA, California; CHW, community health workers; CS, clinic survey; EMOC, emergency obstetric care center; FA, folic acid; FHW, female health workers; FL, Florida; FP, family planning; GBV, gender-based violence; HS, household survey; HCW, health care worker; MA, medical abortion; NGO, nongovernmental organization; NTD, neural tube defects; NY, New York; PNC, postnatal care; PRWORA, Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act; RH, reproductive health; RHG, reproductive health group; SARP, Safe Abortion Referral Program; SRH, sexual and reproductive health; STI, sexually transmitted infection; UMW, undocumented migrant women.
↵a Information obtained from an additional article cited in Howard et al.28
↵b Study rated high quality according to measures used.
↵c Study rated low quality according to measures used.
↵d Study rated medium quality according to measures used.
↵e It is not clear in the study results if women at baseline and follow-up were the same women.