TABLE.

Key Aspects of CPSS Iterative Intervention Development in Ukraine

Stakeholder-Engaged Needs AnalysisRound 1 ImplementationRound 2 ImplementationFormal Pilot Study
TimingJuly–August, 2019September 2019October 2019March 2020
SettingKyiv and ZaporhizyaNeutral settingCommunity settingCommunity setting
Stakeholders involved80 veterans and family members; 58 stakeholders involved in providing supports to veterans and family members; additional representatives from MOVA, MOH, community organizations62 participants (38 veterans, 9 family members, 15 service providers); implemented by 9 experienced CETA providers with observers from development team23 new participants (9 veterans, 14 family members); 6 newly trained CPSS providers24 new participants (8 veterans, 16 family members)
Same 6 newly trained CPSS providers as round 2
InterventionN/A8 sessions averaging 109 minutes, with manipulation of group size and composition, examples, and individual vs. group exercises;
follow-up phone call for safety indication
3 sessions averaging 111 minutes (with break); follow-up call within 1 week for all participants to review assessment results and skill practice3 sessions averaging 133 minutes (with study procedures); 1-week follow-up calls, 1-month follow-up assessment and referrals
Focus of inquiryPsychosocial support needs, barriers to help-seeking, potentially acceptable support strategiesParticipant acceptability; necessary refinements to interventionProvider acceptability; feasibility of training and delivery by community-based providersRefine and practice study procedures; initial trends in outcomes and implementation domains
Information collectedFree lists and in-depth interviewsFocus group discussions;
feedback from providers;
developer observations
Focus group discussions; feedback from providersSelf-assessment data (pre-post); implementation survey (post)
Key findingsPotential of a brief PSS intervention embedded within trusted networks to strengthen coping skills and foster positive relationships to support referralsNecessary changes to content (examples and activities); process (contextualization and length), and group dynamics (group activities); led to revised intervention and greater training emphasis on group facilitationIncreased participant acceptability; training and community-based implementation was feasible; continued development of fidelity tracking toolsPositive participant perspectives on implementation domains; positive trends in reduced symptoms and functional impairment; high 1-month attrition potentially due to COVID-19 outbreak
  • Abbreviations: CETA, Common Elements Treatment Approach; CPSS, CETA Psychosocial Support; MOH, Ministry of Health; MOVA, Ministry of Veterans Affairs; PSS, psychosocial support.