TABLE 2.

Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling: Post-Counseling Results Among Women in the Counseling for Choice Evaluation, Malawi

How do you think the provider did in:Control, No. (%)Intervention, No. (%)ORa(95% CI)aORb(95% CI)ICCcσu2d
Respecting you as a person?
 1 - Poor18 (3.1)9 (1.5) 2.62e (1.38, 4.97)2.65e (1.40, 5.02)0.371.71
 2 - Fair60 (10.4)18 (3.0) 
 3 - Good153 (26.5)118 (19.6) 
 4 - Very good145 (25.1)148 (24.6) 
 5 - Excellent202 (35.0)308 (51.3)
Letting you say what matters to you about your contraceptive method?
 1 - Poor88 (15.2)37 (6.2) 2.37e (1.34, 4.20)2.20f (1.20, 4.00)0.321.40
 2 - Fair81 (14.0)32 (5.3) 
 3 - Good147 (25.4)140 (23.9) 
 4 - Very good103 (17.8)148 (24.6) 
 5 - Excellent159 (27.5)244 (40.6) 
Taking your preferences about contraception seriously?
 1 - Poor50 (9.0)20 (3.3) 2.97e (1.64, 5.37)2.60e (1.42, 4.75)0.341.43
 2 - Fair102 (17.7)36 (6.0) 
 3 - Good145 (25.1)143 (23.8) 
 4 - Very good124 (21.5)152 (25.3) 
 5 - Excellent155 (26.8)250 (41.6) 
Gave enough information to make the best decision about a contraceptive method
 1 - Poor223 (38.6)75 (12.5) 5.68e (3.01, 10.73)5.14e (2.72, 9.71)0.431.63
 2 - Fair103 (17.8)56 (9.3) 
 3 - Good132 (22.8)138 (23.0) 
 4 - Very good56 (9.7)125 (20.8) 
 5 - Excellent64 (11.1)207 (34.4) 
PCCC Measure
 At least one item with less than highest score (“5”)542 (94.8)461 (76.7) 4.76e (1.92, 11.81)4.59e (1.86, 11.33)0.552.95
 Highest score (“5”) on all items36 (6.2)140 (23.3) 
  • Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intraclass correlation; OR, odds ratio; PCCC, person-centered contraceptive counseling.

  • a Estimated from multilevel mixed effects model with ordinal or binary outcomes. Unadjusted OR estimated from bivariate models.

  • b Estimated from models that include demographic variables (age, marital status, and education), a categorical variable for number of living children (defined as none, 1–2, 3–4, or 5 or more), and variables for method chosen at provider visit (including no method chosen) and type of facility (public or private). All adjusted models comprised of 1,179 observations.

  • c Estimated from unadjusted model with random intercepts for health facility but without fixed effects predictors.

  • d Estimated variance for the random effects at the health facility level; estimate has not been exponentiated.

  • e Significant at P<.01.

  • f Significant at P<.05.