Table 5. ART Performance: Results of Bivariate and Multivariate Analyses of Percentage of ART Verification Criteria Achieved, by Data Collection Round and Study Condition, Among Zambia Defence Force Health Facilities

	Bivariate Analysis
ART Performance Standard and Study Condition	% Achieved		Change From Baseline to Endline Within Group		Multivariate Analysis^a
ART Performance Standard and Study Condition	Baseline (n = 175)	Endline (n = 179)	% Points	P value	Adjusted P value for Change Within Group	P value for Interaction
Initial assessment of patient's condition
Comparison	90.1	92.3	+2.2	.08	.67	.001
Intervention	79.6	99.1	+19.5	.001	.001
Check for signs of opportunistic infections
Comparison	86.2	67.8	−18.4	.001	.28	.13
Intervention	65.2	82.9	+17.7	.001	.33
Assessment of adverse reactions
Comparison	61.2	50.0	−11.2	.005	.001	.10
Intervention	44.0	78.9	+34.9	.001	.22
Assessment of potential drug interactions
Comparison	44.2	79.8	+35.6	.001	.001	.26
Intervention	33.1	80.7	+47.6	.001	.001
General health assessment
Comparison	68.3	83.5	+15.2	.001	.25	.29
Intervention	62.3	93.0	+30.7	.001	.001
Verify how patient is taking ART
Comparison	57.0	84.6	+27.6	.001	.05	.93
Intervention	59.8	91.0	+31.2	.001	.02
Addressing identified issues
Comparison	32.9	60.1	+27.2	.001	.20	.93
Intervention	45.0	85.4	+40.4	.001	.001
Concluding the consultation
Comparison	100.0	98.7	−1.3	.06	.17	.83
Intervention	100.0	98.1	−1.9	.03	.25
Nutrition counseling
Comparison	4.6	2.0	−2.6	.09	.41	.001
Intervention	1.6	42.3	+40.7	.001	.001
Overall ART score
Comparison	62.2	69.6	+7.4	.001	.13	.09
Intervention	57.5	84.2	+26.7	.001	.008

Abbreviation: ART, antiretroviral therapy.
P values ≤ .05 were considered statistically significant.
↵a Results from generalized linear regression with Poisson distribution adjusted for Zambia Defence Force branch and clustering within a facility.