TABLE 4.

Odds Ratio Associated With Use of an FABM Relative to Use of Hormonal Contraception or an IUD

Use of an FABM(Relative to Use of HormonalContraception/IUD)
Unadjusted ModelaAdjusted Model±
OR95% CIOR95% CI
Zone (ref :Northern)
    Middle1.9b1.0, 3.51.50.7, 3.4
    Central2.0b1.1, 3.81.10.4, 2.8
Residence (ref: rural)
    Urban2.7c1.5, 4.71.20.6, 2.4
Age (continuous)1.00.9, 1.01.1c1.0, 1.1
Union/marital status (ref: currently married/cohabitating)
    Formerly married or cohabitating0.70.3, 1.50.60.2, 1.3
    Never married or cohabitating2.3d1.3, 4.01.50.8, 2.9
Parity (continuous)0.8c0.7, 0.90.7c0.6, 0.8
Education (ref: none)
    Attended primary or middle1.71.0, 3.01.40.8, 2.5
    Attended secondary4.4c2.3, 8.62.1b1.1, 4.1
Religion (ref: no religion)
    Any Christian2.0b1.1, 4.01.10.6, 2.3
    Muslim1.50.7, 3.31.20.4, 3.3
    Traditional religion/other0.30.1, 1.10.30.1, 1.2
Wealth (ref: poorest 60%)
    Richest 40%3.0c2.0, 4.51.7b1.0, 2.7
Importance of avoiding pregnancy now (ref: very important)
    Not at all important1.8b1.0, 3.21.90.9, 3.7
    Somewhat important1.30.6, 2.71.30.6, 3.2
Correct knowledge of approximate fertile time (ref: incorrect knowledge)
    Correct1.9d1.2, 3.11.50.9, 2.6
  • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FABM, fertility awareness-based method; IUD, intrauterine device; OR, odds ratio.

  • a Model includes only contracepting women who rely or may rely primarily on an FABM (n=206), as well as users of hormonal contraception or an IUD (n=786).

  • ± Adjusted for all other variables shown.

  • b P<.05.

  • c P<.001.

  • d P<.01.