TABLE 3.

Pros and Cons of a Flexible Evaluation Design

ProsCons
  • Is responsive to changing stakeholder needs, thereby increasing stakeholder buy-in and the likelihood findings will be used.

  • Has the ability to adjust to unanticipated implementation delays to refocus on the most timely, relevant evaluation questions.

  • Can take months to get stakeholder consensus on priorities.

  • Requires carefully balancing those stakeholder inputs while remaining objective.

  • May mean that evaluation teams are developing evaluation tools in parallel to prospectively tracking a process that has already started. This may undermine the planning required for intentional mixed methods approaches.