TABLE 5.

Actions Undertaken During Labor by Provider Across Type of Partograph Used

Intervention	ePartogram, No. (%^a)(n=842)	Paper Partograph, No. (%^a)(n=1,042)	Crude Relative Risk (95% CI)	Crude P Value	Adjusted Relative Risk (95% CI)^b	Adjusted P Value
Walk, ambulate	645 (82)	648 (63.3)	1.29 (0.98–1.71)	.07	Model does not converge
Food given	561 (71.3)	456 (44.6)	1.60 (1.14–2.24)	.01	1.73 (1.30–2.30)	<.001
Fluids given	622 (79)	479 (46.8)	1.69 (1.22–2.34)	<.001	1.57 (1.21–2.03)	<.001
Companion present	400 (50.8)	435 (42.5)	1.20 (0.80–1.79)	.39	1.1 (0.70–1.75)	.67
Position of choice	435 (55.3)	255 (24.9)	2.22 (1.05–4.70)	.04	1.49 (0.67–3.30)	.33
Active management of third stage	778 (92.8)	820 (78.7)	1.17 (1.03–1.34)	.02	Model does not converge
Interventions to maintain normal labor	731 (86.8)	697 (66.9)	1.30 (0.96–1.76)	.10	1.09 (0.92–1.29)	.34
Interventions to address fetal well-being	116 (14.7)	54 (5.3)	2.79 (1.03–7.57)	.04	4.00 (1.95–8.19)	<.001
Interventions to addresslabor abnormality	246 (31)	171 (16.7)	1.86 (0.98–3.55)	.06	1.31 (0.67–2.57)	.42

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval; ePartogram, electronic partogram.
↵a Percentages exclude missing cases.
↵b Relative risk adjusted for strike period, CEmONC facility, faith-based facility, number of providers, multiparity, and admission after 5 cm dilatation.