Effectiveness of Electronic Partogram on Fetal Outcomes Using Log Binomial Models (n=1,498)
| Crude Relative Risk | Adjusted Relative Risk | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRR (95% CI) | P Value | Adjusted IRR (95% CI) | P Value | |
| ePartogram group | 0.34 (0.22–0.54) | .001 | 0.44 (0.27–0.73) | .01 |
| Strike time | 1.09 (0.77–1.53) | .62 | 1.33 (0.95–1.88) | .10 |
| CEmONC facility | 0.94 (0.45–2.00) | .88 | 1.13 (0.81–1.57) | .47 |
| Faith-based facility | 1.41 (0.83–2.41) | .20 | 0.80 (0.67–0.95) | .01 |
| Number of providers | 0.93 (0.90–0.95) | .001 | 0.96 (0.93–1.00) | .03 |
| Multiparity | 0.67 (0.51–0.88) | .001 | 0.65 (0.50–0.84) | .01 |
| Dilation >5 cm | 0.89 (0.72–1.11) | .31 | 0.95 (0.82–1.11) | .54 |
Abbreviations: CEmONC, comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care; CI, confidence interval; ePartogram, electronic partogram; IRR, incident rate ratio.