TABLE 2.

Parameters Used to Calculate District Costs of MNH Care, Life-Years Lost Due to Maternal Death, and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness of Deaths Averted

NumberParameterValueData SourceNotes
Costs (all)
1Discount rate3%WHO-CHOICE recommendation34Locally published discount rates used in sensitivity analysis (15% in Uganda and 9.7% in Zambia)35,36
Costs 2012
2Costs associated with the first delayVaries by district (see Table 4)Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, and implementing partners in comparison districtsInterviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked. Costs for existing maternity waiting homes are included.
3Costs associated with the second delayVaries by district (see Table 4)Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, implementing partners, and review of ambulance log books in comparison districtsInterviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked.
4Unit cost of ANCVaries by type of facility (see Table 3)Data collection at health facilities in comparison districts, interviews with implementing partnersInclusive of facility overhead costs
5Number of ANC visitsRatio of ANC visits to number of facility birthsData from health facility registers/district health offices in comparison districtsNumber of facility births based on SMGL districts data from 2012
6Unit cost of vaginal deliveryVaries by type of facility (see Table 3)Data collection at health facilities in comparison districts, interviews with implementing partnersInclusive of facility overhead costs and admissions (for mother and newborn)
7Number of vaginal deliveriesVaries by districtData from health facility registers/district health offices in comparison districts, Serbanescu and colleagues30Number for SMGL districts in 2012
8Unit cost of cesarean deliveryVaries by type of facility (see Table 3)Data collection at health facilities in comparison districts, interviews with implementing partnersInclusive of facility overhead costs and admissions (for mother and newborn)
9Number of cesarean deliveriesVaries by districtData from health facility registers/district health offices in comparison districts, Serbanescu and colleagues30Number for SMGL districts in 2012
10Above community/facility costsVaries by district (see Table 4)Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, and implementing partners in comparison districtsInterviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked.
11Total costs of MNH care in 2012CalculationBased on parameters 2–10
Costs 2016
12Costs associated with the first delayVaries by district (see Table 4)Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, and implementing partners in SMGL districtsInterviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs tracked. Costs for maternity waiting homes are included.
13Costs associated with the second delayVaries by district (see Table 4)Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, implementing partners, and review of ambulance log books in SMGL districtsInterviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked.
14Unit cost of ANCVaries by type of facility (see Table 3)Data collection at health facilities in SMGL districts, interviews with implementing partnersInclusive of facility overhead costs
15Number of ANC visitsRatio of ANC visits to number of facility birthsData from health facility registers/district health offices in SMGL districtsNumber of facility births based on SMGL districts data from 2016
16Unit cost of vaginal deliveryVaries by type of facility (see Table 3)Data collection at health facilities in SMGL districts, interviews with implementing partners.Inclusive of facility overhead costs and admissions (for mother and newborn)
17Number of vaginal deliveriesVaries by districtSerbanescu and colleagues30Number for SMGL districts in 2016
18Unit cost of cesarean deliveryVaries by type of facility (see Table 3)Data collection at health facilities in SMGL districts, interviews with implementing partnersInclusive of facility overhead costs and admissions (for mother and newborn)
19Number of cesarean deliveriesVaries by districtData from health facility registers/district health offices in SMGL districts, Serbanescu and colleagues30Number for SMGL districts in 2016
20Above community/ facility costsVaries by district (see Table 4)Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, and implementing partners in comparison districtsInterviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked.
21Total costs of MNH care in 2016CalculationBased on parameters 12–20In Uganda, included cost of patients referred to Fort Portal referral hospital
Deaths in 2012
22Number of facility-based deliveriesVaries by districtPOMS and unpublished district data,31 district offices in SMGL districtsNumber of deliveries for SMGL districts in 2016 multiplied by the institutional delivery rate in 2012
23Maternal death ratio534 deaths (Uganda) and 370 deaths (Zambia) per 100,000 live birthsSerbanescu and colleagues30
24Perinatal death rate39.3 (Uganda) and 37.9 deaths (Zambia) per 1,000 birthsSerbanescu and colleagues30
25Number of maternal deathsCalculationParameter 22 × proportion of deliveries with live births/100,000 × Parameter 23
26Number of perinatal deathsCalculationParameter 22/1,000 × Parameter 24
27Total number of deathsCalculationParameter 25 + Parameter 26
28Life-years lost due to deathYears of life left estimated as 62.5 and 45.6 for perinatal and maternal death in Uganda and 62.3 and 45.7 for perinatal and maternal death in ZambiaWHO life tables40,41Assume average age at death for maternal death is 27.5, for perinatal in first 2 days of life
Deaths in 2016
29Number of facility-based deliveriesVaries by districtPOMS and unpublished district data,31 district offices in SMGL districtsNumber for SMGL districts in 2016; varied in sensitivity analysis based on results for all SMGL districts24
30Maternal death ratio300 deaths (Uganda) and 231 deaths (Zambia) per 100,000 live birthsSerbanescu and colleagues30Decreased the percentage reduction in deaths results by 10 percentage points in sensitivity analysis
31Perinatal death rate34.4 (Uganda) and 28.2 deaths (Zambia) per 1,000 birthsSerbanescu and colleagues30
32Number of maternal deathsCalculationParameter 29 × proportion of deliveries with live births/100,000 × Parameter 30
33Number of perinatal deathsCalculationParameter 29/1,000 × Parameter 31
34Total number of deathsCalculationParameter 32 + Parameter 33
35Life-years lost due to deathYears of life left estimated as 62.5 and 45.6 for perinatal and maternal death in Uganda and 62.3 and 45.7 for perinatal and maternal death in ZambiaWHO life tables40,41Assume average age at death for maternal death is 27.5, for perinatal in first 2 days of life. Years of life left estimated as 62.5 and 45.6 for perinatal and maternal death in Uganda and 62.3 and 45.7 for perinatal and maternal death in Zambia.
Incremental cost-effectiveness
36Incremental costsCalculationParameter 21 − Parameter 11In sensitivity analysis, reassess with all donor costs treated as incremental costs.
37Incremental deaths avertedCalculationParameter 34 − Parameter 27
38Incremental life-years gainedCalculationParameter 35 − Parameter 28
39Incremental cost per death avertedCalculationParameter 36/Parameter 37
40Incremental cost per life-year gainedCalculationParameter 36/Parameter 38
  • Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; MNH, maternal and newborn health; POMS, Pregnancy Outcome Monitoring Survey; SMGL, Saving Mothers, Giving Life; WHO CHOICE, World Health Organization's Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective.