Number | Parameter | Value | Data Source | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Costs (all) | ||||
1 | Discount rate | 3% | WHO-CHOICE recommendation34 | Locally published discount rates used in sensitivity analysis (15% in Uganda and 9.7% in Zambia)35,36 |
Costs 2012 | ||||
2 | Costs associated with the first delay | Varies by district (see Table 4) | Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, and implementing partners in comparison districts | Interviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked. Costs for existing maternity waiting homes are included. |
3 | Costs associated with the second delay | Varies by district (see Table 4) | Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, implementing partners, and review of ambulance log books in comparison districts | Interviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked. |
4 | Unit cost of ANC | Varies by type of facility (see Table 3) | Data collection at health facilities in comparison districts, interviews with implementing partners | Inclusive of facility overhead costs |
5 | Number of ANC visits | Ratio of ANC visits to number of facility births | Data from health facility registers/district health offices in comparison districts | Number of facility births based on SMGL districts data from 2012 |
6 | Unit cost of vaginal delivery | Varies by type of facility (see Table 3) | Data collection at health facilities in comparison districts, interviews with implementing partners | Inclusive of facility overhead costs and admissions (for mother and newborn) |
7 | Number of vaginal deliveries | Varies by district | Data from health facility registers/district health offices in comparison districts, Serbanescu and colleagues30 | Number for SMGL districts in 2012 |
8 | Unit cost of cesarean delivery | Varies by type of facility (see Table 3) | Data collection at health facilities in comparison districts, interviews with implementing partners | Inclusive of facility overhead costs and admissions (for mother and newborn) |
9 | Number of cesarean deliveries | Varies by district | Data from health facility registers/district health offices in comparison districts, Serbanescu and colleagues30 | Number for SMGL districts in 2012 |
10 | Above community/facility costs | Varies by district (see Table 4) | Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, and implementing partners in comparison districts | Interviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked. |
11 | Total costs of MNH care in 2012 | Calculation | Based on parameters 2–10 | |
Costs 2016 | ||||
12 | Costs associated with the first delay | Varies by district (see Table 4) | Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, and implementing partners in SMGL districts | Interviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs tracked. Costs for maternity waiting homes are included. |
13 | Costs associated with the second delay | Varies by district (see Table 4) | Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, implementing partners, and review of ambulance log books in SMGL districts | Interviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked. |
14 | Unit cost of ANC | Varies by type of facility (see Table 3) | Data collection at health facilities in SMGL districts, interviews with implementing partners | Inclusive of facility overhead costs |
15 | Number of ANC visits | Ratio of ANC visits to number of facility births | Data from health facility registers/district health offices in SMGL districts | Number of facility births based on SMGL districts data from 2016 |
16 | Unit cost of vaginal delivery | Varies by type of facility (see Table 3) | Data collection at health facilities in SMGL districts, interviews with implementing partners. | Inclusive of facility overhead costs and admissions (for mother and newborn) |
17 | Number of vaginal deliveries | Varies by district | Serbanescu and colleagues30 | Number for SMGL districts in 2016 |
18 | Unit cost of cesarean delivery | Varies by type of facility (see Table 3) | Data collection at health facilities in SMGL districts, interviews with implementing partners | Inclusive of facility overhead costs and admissions (for mother and newborn) |
19 | Number of cesarean deliveries | Varies by district | Data from health facility registers/district health offices in SMGL districts, Serbanescu and colleagues30 | Number for SMGL districts in 2016 |
20 | Above community/ facility costs | Varies by district (see Table 4) | Interviews with health facility staff, district health office staff, provincial health office staff, and implementing partners in comparison districts | Interviews covered the period 2012 through 2016; start-up activities and capital costs were tracked. |
21 | Total costs of MNH care in 2016 | Calculation | Based on parameters 12–20 | In Uganda, included cost of patients referred to Fort Portal referral hospital |
Deaths in 2012 | ||||
22 | Number of facility-based deliveries | Varies by district | POMS and unpublished district data,31 district offices in SMGL districts | Number of deliveries for SMGL districts in 2016 multiplied by the institutional delivery rate in 2012 |
23 | Maternal death ratio | 534 deaths (Uganda) and 370 deaths (Zambia) per 100,000 live births | Serbanescu and colleagues30 | |
24 | Perinatal death rate | 39.3 (Uganda) and 37.9 deaths (Zambia) per 1,000 births | Serbanescu and colleagues30 | |
25 | Number of maternal deaths | Calculation | Parameter 22 × proportion of deliveries with live births/100,000 × Parameter 23 | |
26 | Number of perinatal deaths | Calculation | Parameter 22/1,000 × Parameter 24 | |
27 | Total number of deaths | Calculation | Parameter 25 + Parameter 26 | |
28 | Life-years lost due to death | Years of life left estimated as 62.5 and 45.6 for perinatal and maternal death in Uganda and 62.3 and 45.7 for perinatal and maternal death in Zambia | WHO life tables40,41 | Assume average age at death for maternal death is 27.5, for perinatal in first 2 days of life |
Deaths in 2016 | ||||
29 | Number of facility-based deliveries | Varies by district | POMS and unpublished district data,31 district offices in SMGL districts | Number for SMGL districts in 2016; varied in sensitivity analysis based on results for all SMGL districts24 |
30 | Maternal death ratio | 300 deaths (Uganda) and 231 deaths (Zambia) per 100,000 live births | Serbanescu and colleagues30 | Decreased the percentage reduction in deaths results by 10 percentage points in sensitivity analysis |
31 | Perinatal death rate | 34.4 (Uganda) and 28.2 deaths (Zambia) per 1,000 births | Serbanescu and colleagues30 | |
32 | Number of maternal deaths | Calculation | Parameter 29 × proportion of deliveries with live births/100,000 × Parameter 30 | |
33 | Number of perinatal deaths | Calculation | Parameter 29/1,000 × Parameter 31 | |
34 | Total number of deaths | Calculation | Parameter 32 + Parameter 33 | |
35 | Life-years lost due to death | Years of life left estimated as 62.5 and 45.6 for perinatal and maternal death in Uganda and 62.3 and 45.7 for perinatal and maternal death in Zambia | WHO life tables40,41 | Assume average age at death for maternal death is 27.5, for perinatal in first 2 days of life. Years of life left estimated as 62.5 and 45.6 for perinatal and maternal death in Uganda and 62.3 and 45.7 for perinatal and maternal death in Zambia. |
Incremental cost-effectiveness | ||||
36 | Incremental costs | Calculation | Parameter 21 − Parameter 11 | In sensitivity analysis, reassess with all donor costs treated as incremental costs. |
37 | Incremental deaths averted | Calculation | Parameter 34 − Parameter 27 | |
38 | Incremental life-years gained | Calculation | Parameter 35 − Parameter 28 | |
39 | Incremental cost per death averted | Calculation | Parameter 36/Parameter 37 | |
40 | Incremental cost per life-year gained | Calculation | Parameter 36/Parameter 38 |
Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; MNH, maternal and newborn health; POMS, Pregnancy Outcome Monitoring Survey; SMGL, Saving Mothers, Giving Life; WHO CHOICE, World Health Organization's Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective.