Difference-in-Difference Analysis on Core ITN Indicators
| Comparison | Difference-in-Differences | P Value |
|---|---|---|
| HH owns any ITN | ||
| Obubra (3 rounds) vs. Comparisona | 58.8% | <.001 |
| Ogoja (2 rounds) vs. Comparisona | 58.9% | <.001 |
| Obubra (3 rounds) vs. Ogoja (2 rounds) | −0.01% | .99 |
| HH owns at least 1 ITN per 2 people | ||
| Obubra (3 rounds) vs. Comparisona | 28.2% | <.001 |
| Ogoja (2 rounds) vs. Comparisona | 28.8% | <.001 |
| Obubra (3 rounds) vs. Ogoja (2 rounds) | −0.6% | .91 |
| Population access to ITN within HHb | ||
| Obubra (3 rounds) vs. Comparisona | 49.6% | <.001 |
| Ogoja (2 rounds) vs. Comparisona | 47.2% | <.001 |
| Obubra (3 rounds) vs. Ogoja (2 rounds) | 2.4% | .42 |
Abbreviations: HH, household; ITN, insecticide-treated net.
↵a The rest of the LGAs (8 total) in the wave 1 distribution served as the comparison group at baseline, while Ikom LGA served as the comparison group at endline.
↵b Proportion of the population with access to an ITN within their household (assuming each ITN in a household can be used by 2 people).