TABLE 3.

ITN Ownership, Access, and Use (%) at Baseline and Endline, by Comparisona and Intervention Sites

Baseline (N=753)Endline (N=1,450)
Rest of Wave 1(Comparison)Ogoja LGA(2 Rounds)Obubra LGA(3 Rounds)Ikom LGA(Comparison)Ogoja LGA(2 Rounds)Obubra LGA(3 Rounds)
Household level
Owns at least 1 ITN63.9 (56.4, 70.8)49.5 (44.7, 54.3)51.1 (35.3, 66.7)43.3(37.4, 49.4)76.4(71.2, 81.0)77.9(71.5, 83.1)
Owns at least 1 ITN per 2 people24.4 (17.8, 32.5)17.7 (13.0, 23.7)17.4 (11.8, 25.0)13.9(10.7, 17.8)29.9(25.1, 35.2)30.3(26.1, 34.8)
ITN supply
Less than 1 ITN per 3 people21.1(16.2, 27.2)16.8 (13.1, 21.5)20.8 (15.1, 27.9)20.5(15.8, 26.2)23.2(19.8, 26.9)23.6(20.5, 27.0)
1 ITN per 3 people18.4 (14.3, 23.2)15.0(10.5, 20.9)12.9(7.8, 20.6)8.9(6.5, 12.0)23.4(19.3, 27.9)24.0(20.3, 28.1)
1 ITN per 2 people21.1 (16.7, 26.2)13.5 (9.7, 18.6)14.5 (9.5, 21.6)12.2(9.1, 16.2)23.8(19.6, 28.5)22.8(19.0, 27.0)
1 ITN or more per person3.3 (1.2, 9.2)4.2 (2.3, 7.6)2.9 (1.1, 7.5)1.7(0.9, 16.2)6.2(4.1, 9.2)7.5(5.2, 10.8)
Population level
Population access to ITNb46.8 (40.0, 53.7)35.7 (32.0, 39.5)33.5(23.2, 45.6)25.7(21.9, 29.9)53.1(48.0, 58.0)54.7(48.4, 60.9)
ITN use previous night41.8 (35.6, 48.3)28.9 (26.1, 31.8)28.5(17.9, 42.0)16.8(13.7, 20.4)24.0(20.6, 27.7)31.6(26.1, 37.6)
ITN use previous night among population with access to ITN92.5 (86.3, 99.0)84.7 (81.4, 88.5)88.3(77.9, 99.8)66.7(63.6, 70.3)45.7(42.3, 49.4)61.2(55.3, 66.7)
  • Abbreviations: ITN, insecticide-treated net; LGA, local government area.

  • All data shown as % (95% confidence interval).

  • a The rest of the LGAs (8 total) in the wave 1 distribution served as the comparison group at baseline, while Ikom LGA served as the comparison at endline.

  • b Proportion of the population with access to an ITN within their household (assuming each ITN in a household can be used by 2 people).