TABLE 4.

Differences in Child Nutrition Outcomes at Endline Between the Intervention and Control Groups

Intervention Group: Children of FFS Beneficiaries (n=265)Control Group: Children of Non-FFS Participants (n=206)Difference Between GroupsP Value
Adjusted endline stunting prevalence,a % (CI)60.2 (50.8 to 69.6)58.8 (50.1 to 67.5)1.4 (−10.7 to 13.6).81
Adjusted endline underweight prevalence,b % (CI)22.3 (14.8 to 29.8)29.8 (22.0 to 37.7)−7.6 (−17.7 to 2.5).13
  • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FFS, farmer field school; SD, standard deviation.

  • a Adjusted for baseline stunting status, territory, agro-ecological zone, maternal age, and maternal education; children with a height-for-age z score less than −2 SD using the 2006 WHO child growth standards (for children ages 6–59 months) and the 2007 WHO reference (for children over 5 years) were classified as stunted.

  • b Adjusted for baseline underweight status, territory, agro-ecological zone, maternal age, and maternal education; children with a weight-for-age z score less than −2 SD using the 2006 WHO child growth standards (for children ages 6–59 months) and the 2007 WHO reference (for children over 5 years) were classified as underweight.