Indicators of Training Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results Among the Faculty Fellows
| Full Cohorta | M&E (N=7) | Data Management (N=11) | Complex Survey Analysis (N=9) | Health Data Science (N=8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reaction | |||||
| Rating of overall quality of course content, no. (%) | |||||
| Excellent | 16 (57) | 6 (55) | 6 (67) | 4 (50) | |
| Very good | 11 (39) | 5 (45) | 3 (33) | 3 (38) | |
| Average, fair, or poorb | 1 (4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (12) | |
| Rating of overall usefulness of course content | |||||
| Excellent | 16 (57) | 8 (73) | 4 (44) | 4 (50) | |
| Very good | 12 (43) | 3 (27) | 5 (56) | 4 (50) | |
| Average, fair, or poorb | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Would recommend workshop training to another faculty fellow, no. (%) | |||||
| Definitely would | 27 (96) | 11 (100) | 8 (89) | 8 (100) | |
| Probably would | 1 (4) | 0 (0) | 1 (11) | 0 (0) | |
| Probably would not or definitely would not2 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Learning, median (IQR) | |||||
| Change in confidence in teaching course contentc | 29 (19, 42) | 24 (19, 48) | 33 (8, 33) | — | |
| Change in confidence in teaching pedagogyc | 33 (22, 47) | 33 (0, 44) | 25 (20, 50) | — | |
| Change in knowledge for fellows in content area (quiz)d | 20 (0, 20) | 20 (0, 40) | 0 (0, 20) | — | |
| Behavior | |||||
| The McGoldrick program has impacted my work or teaching, no. (%) | 21 (100) | 7 (100) | 11 (100) | 9 (100) | |
| Results | |||||
| Has offered the course at their institution, no. (%) | 14 (52) | 7 (100) | 6 (55) | 1 (11) | — |
| Among those who have offered the course | |||||
| Times course was offered, median (IQR) | 1 (1, 2) | 1 (1, 2) | 1 (1, 2) | 1 (1,1) | — |
| Total students reached, no. | 380 | 228 | 139 | 13 | — |
| Students reached per offering, median (IQR) | 21 (11, 25) | 22 (21, 25) | 14 (11, 21) | 13 (13, 13) | — |
| Course format, no. (%) | |||||
| Short course | 16 (84) | 8 (89) | 6 (67) | 1 (100) | — |
| Full semester course | 2 (11) | 1 (11) | 2 (22) | 0 (0) | — |
| Incorporated content into existing course, no. (%) | 1 (5) | 0 (0) | 1 (11) | 0 (0) | — |
| Sessions, median (IQR) | 14 (10, 19) | 18 (10, 24) | 10 (9, 15) | 14 (14, 14) | — |
| Faculty, median (IQR) | 4 (2, 6) | 5 (4, 6) | 2 (2, 3) | 9 (9, 9) | — |
| Faculty from outside institutions, median (IQR) | 1 (0, 1) | 1 (1, 1) | 0 (0, 1) | 7 (7, 7) | — |
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; M&E, monitoring and evaluation.
↵a This is the full cohort for which data are available, which could represent participants from 1, 2, 3, or 4 rounds of training.
↵b Response categories combined for reporting purposes.
↵c Summative index of questions with 4- or 5-level response options, scaled from 0–100 so that the difference represents a percentage point change.
↵d Number of questions correct on 5-question quiz scaled from 0–100 so that the difference represents a percentage point change.