Percentage of Good Management Practices Used to Support CLAS Facilities, by DIRESA and Study Group, Peru
Group 1a | Callao | Loreto | Tacna | Piura | Arequipa | Cusco | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practices reported, no. (%) | 15 (46.9) | 16 (50.0) | 12 (37.5) | 14 (43.8) | 11 (34.8) | 10 (31.3) | 78 (40.6)c |
Practices considered, no. | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 192 |
Group 2b | Moquegua | Ica | Apurímac | Huánuco | Cajamarca | Ancash | Total |
Practices reported, no. (%) | 8 (25.0) | 9 (28.1) | 6 (18.8) | 10 (31.3) | 7 (21.9) | 6 (18.8) | 46 (24.0) |
Practices considered, no. | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 192 |
Abbreviations: CLAS, Comunidad Local de Administración de Salud; DIRESA, regional health directorate.
a DIRESAs with a higher level of compliance with the goals contracted by CLAS.
↵b DIRESAs with a lower level of compliance with the goals contracted by CLAS.
↵c Chi-square difference in study groups with Yates correction: X2=(1,N=384)=11.45, P<.01.