PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Carrasco, Maria
AU  - Ohkubo, Saori
AU  - Preaux, Annie
AU  - Galavotti, Christine
AU  - Mickler, Alexandria
AU  - Raney, Laura
AU  - Saad, Abdulmumin
AU  - May, Ados Velez
AU  - Quinn, Heidi
TI  - Assessing Use, Usefulness, and Application of the High Impact Practices in Family Planning Briefs and Strategic Planning Guides
AID  - 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00146
DP  - 2023 Aug 28
TA  - Global Health: Science and Practice
PG  - e2200146
VI  - 11
IP  - 4
4099  - http://www.ghspjournal.org/content/11/4/e2200146.short
4100  - http://www.ghspjournal.org/content/11/4/e2200146.full
SO  - GLOB HEALTH SCI PRACT2023 Aug 28; 11
AB  - Key FindingsThe High Impact Practices (HIPs) briefs and strategic planning guides can help disseminate knowledge to a wide non-academic audience, support advocacy efforts, and strengthen family planning (FP) programs.Interviews with FP professionals revealed a need to enhance local use of HIP briefs and strategic planning guides, adapt or develop additional formats and products for different audiences, and facilitate access to resources to support HIP implementation.Key ImplicationsCreators of knowledge products intended for a non-academic audience, such as decision-makers and program implementers, should consider the importance of using simple, clear language and ensuring quality control of any translated material.Requesting input from the main audience of knowledge products is critical to ensure such products address existing gaps and needs, thereby making efficient use of resources.Background:In global health, persistent barriers and challenges to bridging the gap between research and practice remain critical to address in most health areas. The High Impact Practices (HIPs) briefs and strategic planning guides aim to bridge the know-do gap in family planning (FP) by facilitating research utilization and knowledge sharing and also providing a summary of experiential knowledge from experts. The purpose of this qualitative study was to assess the use, usefulness, and application of these 2 knowledge products developed by the HIP Partnership for decision-makers and implementers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).Methods:This research used in-depth interviews with FP stakeholders from various LMICs to assess the use, usefulness, and application of 2 HIP products for FP decision-makers and implementers. The analysis was shaped by an adapted logic model framework to assess HIP product reach, engagement, usefulness, learning, and action.Results:We interviewed 35 FP professionals from January to March 2021. Participants reported that HIP products have a wide reach, have garnered positive engagement, and were useful. Participants generally liked the current format of the HIP products and reported using them to inform program design, guide discussions with partners, enhance personal knowledge, support advocacy work, and strengthen the guidance they provide to colleagues in the field. The participants shared important feedback to improve the development and dissemination of HIP products, particularly a need to enhance local access and use.Conclusion:The study highlighted the importance of knowledge products, such as the HIP briefs and strategic planning guides, to make evidence and experiential knowledge accessible to a wide audience. These can be valuable tools for policymakers and program implementers to ensure public health practices are evidence-based and integrate experiential knowledge.