RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Innovations in Providing HIV Index Testing Services: A Retrospective Evaluation of Partner Elicitation Models in Southern Nigeria JF Global Health: Science and Practice JO GLOB HEALTH SCI PRACT FD Johns Hopkins University- Global Health. Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs DO 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00013 A1 Dibia, Caesar C. A1 Nwaokoro, Pius A1 Akpan, Uduak A1 Toyo, Otoyo A1 Cartier, Simon A1 Sanwo, Olusola A1 Sydney-Agbor, Ngozi A1 Afirima, Barinaada A1 Kakanfo, Kunle A1 Essien, Uwem A1 Walker, Christa Fischer A1 Khamofu, Hadiza A1 Pandey, Satish Raj A1 Bateganya, Moses YR 2024 UL http://www.ghspjournal.org/content/early/2024/09/24/GHSP-D-24-00013.abstract AB Key FindingsIndex testing is part of the strategies to identify individuals who are infected with HIV through their HIV-positive contacts.Optimal index testing services depend largely on the ability to elicit sexual contacts from HIV-positive clients.Because some clients do not feel comfortable reporting their contacts, a low elicitation rate has been implicated in suboptimal testing of index contacts.The introduction of an elicitation box, in which an HIV-positive index can report sexual contacts on paper and insert in a box for a health care provider to contact at a later time, was expected to increase the elicitation rate of index contacts.Compared to the conventional elicitation model, the elicitation box model was found to be more likely to increase the rate of partners elicited, particularly for index clients with multiple sexual contacts.Key ImplicationHIV program managers should consider the introduction of the elicitation box model as an alternative strategy to increase partner elicitation.Background: This analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of eliciting sexual partners from HIV-positive clients using the elicitation box model (where an HIV-positive index can report sexual contacts on paper and insert in a box for a health care provider to contact at a later time) compared to the conventional model (in which a health care provider elicits sexual contacts directly from clients) in Akwa Ibom, Southern Nigeria.Methods: Between March 2021 and April 2022, data were collected from index testing registers at 4 health facilities with a high volume of HIV clients currently on treatment in 4 local government areas in Akwa Ibom State. Primary outcome analyzed was the elicitation ratio (number of partners elicited per HIV-index offered index testing services). Secondary outcomes were the index testing acceptance (index HIV-positive clients accepted index testing service), testing coverage (partners tested for HIV from a list of partners elicited from HIV-index accepted index testing services), testing yield (index partners identified HIV positive from index partners HIV-tested), and linkage rate (index partners identified HIV positive and linked to antiretroviral therapy).Results: Of the total 2,705 index clients offered index testing services, 91.9% accepted, with 2,043 and 439 indexes opting for conventional elicitation and elicitation box models, respectively. A total of 3,796 sexual contacts were elicited: 2,546 using the conventional model (elicitation ratio=1:1) and 1,250 using the elicitation box model (elicitation ratio=1:3). Testing coverage was significantly higher in the conventional compared to the elicitation box model (P<.001). However, there was no significant difference in the testing yield (P=.81) and linkage rate using the conventional compared to elicitation box models (P=.13).Conclusion: The implementation of the elicitation box model resulted in an increase in partner elicitation compared to the conventional model. Increasing the testing coverage by implementing the elicitation box model should be considered.