Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS

Latest Articles

  • Open Access
    Women's Limited Choice and Availability of Modern Contraception at Retail Outlets and Public-Sector Facilities in Luanda, Angola, 2012–2015
    Benjamin Nieto-Andrade, Eva Fidel, Rebecca Simmons, Dana Sievers, Anya Fedorova, Suzanne Bell, Karen Weidert and Ndola Prata
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):75-89; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00304

    Despite high rates of unintended pregnancy, access to a wide range of contraceptive methods, especially injectables and long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), is severely limited in both public and private facilities. Knowledge of contraceptive choices is likewise limited, yet a substantial proportion of women are not using their preferred method among the methods they know of.

  • Open Access
    Comparing Women's Contraceptive Preferences With Their Choices in 5 Urban Family Planning Clinics in Ghana
    Sarah D Rominski, Emmanuel SK Morhe, Ernest Maya, Abukar Manu and Vanessa K Dalton
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):65-74; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00281

    Women's method choice largely matched their stated desired duration of effectiveness but not their desires to avoid certain side effects. While most women reported they were counseled about side effects, many fewer reported being specifically counseled about common menstrual side effects with their chosen method, including side effects the women said would cause them to stop using the method.

  • Open Access
    mJustice: Preliminary Development of a Mobile App for Medical-Forensic Documentation of Sexual Violence in Low-Resource Environments and Conflict Zones
    Ranit Mishori, Michael Anastario, Karen Naimer, Sucharita Varanasi, Hope Ferdowsian, Dori Abel and Kevin Chugh
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):138-151; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00233

    The MediCapt mobile app has promise for clinicians to capture medical and forensic evidence of sexual violence and securely transmit the data to legal authorities for potential use in prosecution. We believe this application broadens the traditional scope of mHealth to collecting evidence, and thus name it mJustice.

  • Open Access
    CDC's Male Circumcision Recommendations Represent a Key Public Health Measure
    Brian J Morris, John N Krieger and Jeffrey D Klausner
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):15-27; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00390

    Frisch and Earp, opponents of male circumcision, have criticized draft recommendations from the CDC that advocate counseling men and parents of newborn boys in the United States about the benefits and risks of male circumcision. We provide a rebuttal to Frisch and Earp's criticisms and contend that the recommendations are entirely appropriate and merit consideration for policy development.

  • Open Access
    Can We Expect Results-Based Financing to Improve Quality of Care?
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):1-3; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00069

    Performance-based incentives as currently employed appear poorly adapted for improving quality of clinical processes. They mainly measure structural items that, while easier to measure, are remote from actual clinical quality, and they could even perversely lead to heightened attention to those factors at the expense of clinical quality.

  • Open Access
    Excellent Family Planning Progress in Nigeria Reported by PMA2020
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):28-32; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00094
    • Modern method contraceptive prevalence among married women in Nigeria has jumped to 16.0% in 2016 compared with <10% in 2013.

    • Notable increases were observed in the South as well as in some Northern states that had strong programming.

    • Most of the increase was in the uptake of highly effective implants and injectables.

    • But substantial unmet need for family planning remains, especially among the poorest quintile.

    • Implants and IUDs are not offered in many facilities and stock-outs are common, suggesting further progress is achievable with improved program effort.

  • Open Access
    Winners of the Consortium of Universities for Global Health–Global Health: Science and Practice Annual Student Manuscript Contest
    James D Shelton, Pierre Buekens and Elizabeth Grant
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):4-5; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00053

    The 2 inaugural winners of the CUGH–GHSP Annual Student Manuscript Contest describe (1) the American Mock World Health Organization model for engaging students in global health policy and diplomacy, and (2) a successful Indo-U.S. twinning model of global health academic partnership led by students.

  • Open Access
    “New Users” Are Confusing Our Counting: Reaching Consensus on How to Measure “Additional Users” of Family Planning
    Aisha Dasgupta, Michelle Weinberger, Ben Bellows and Win Brown
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):6-14; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00328

    FP2020's overarching goal is framed around the new metric of “additional users.” This measure inherently captures population-level change but has been conflated with other ambiguous metrics, such as “new users.” Therefore, we propose a standard set of terms to provide more consistent measurement. Although commonly used service-level metrics cannot be directly compared to the population-level metric of additional users, we describe 2 modeling approaches that can allow service-level data to inform estimates of additional users.

  • Open Access
    Quality of Care in Performance-Based Financing: How It Is Incorporated in 32 Programs Across 28 Countries
    Jessica Gergen, Erik Josephson, Martha Coe, Samantha Ski, Supriya Madhavan and Sebastian Bauhoff
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):90-107; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00239

    Structural aspects of quality such as equipment and infrastructure were the most frequently measured, with some measurement of processes of clinical care. Further examination is warranted to assess whether variations in how quality of care is incorporated into performance-based financing programs lead to differential effects.

  • Open Access
    American Mock World Health Organization: An Innovative Model for Student Engagement in Global Health Policy
    Mia Lei, Neha Acharya, Edith Kwok Man Lee, Emma Catherine Holcomb and Veronica Kapoor
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2017, 5(1):164-174; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00138

    The American Mock World Health Organization (AMWHO) provides a platform for students to apply their knowledge of global health policy through simulations of the World Health Assembly (WHA). This model engages and empowers future global leaders in health policy while sharpening their skills in diplomacy, public speaking, and conflict resolution. The major theme for the AMWHO 2015 was Universal Health Coverage, reflecting what the WHA had discussed in preceding months.

Pages

  • Previous
  • Next
  • 1
  • …
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • …
  • 111
Back to top
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire