Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Sign up for Alerts
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • News
    • GHSP Call for Papers
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Sign up for Alerts
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • News
    • GHSP Call for Papers
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda

Susan Igras, Irit Sinai, Marie Mukabatsinda, Fidele Ngabo, Victoria Jennings and Rebecka Lundgren
Global Health: Science and Practice May 2014, ghs1300165; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00165
Susan Igras
aGeorgetown University's, Institute for Reproductive Health, Washington, DC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irit Sinai
aGeorgetown University's, Institute for Reproductive Health, Washington, DC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Mukabatsinda
bInstitute for Reproductive Health, Kigali, Rwanda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fidele Ngabo
cMinistry of Health [Rwanda], Kigali, Rwanda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria Jennings
aGeorgetown University's, Institute for Reproductive Health, Washington, DC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecka Lundgren
aGeorgetown University's, Institute for Reproductive Health, Washington, DC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lundgrer@georgetown.edu
Next
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Corrigendum: Igras et al., Systems Approach to Monitoring and Evaluation Guides Scale Up of the Standard Days Method of Family Planning in Rwanda - December 28, 2017

Scaling-up lessons included: (1) simplifying provider training and client materials; (2) ensuring core aspects of the intervention, for example, that the CycleBeads client tool was integrated into the supply chain system; (3) addressing provider-generated medical barriers; and (4) managing threats from changing political and policy environments. A focus on systems, the use of multiple M&E data sources, maintaining fidelity of the innovation, and ongoing environmental scans facilitated scale-up success.

Abstract

There is no guarantee that a successful pilot program introducing a reproductive health innovation can also be expanded successfully to the national or regional level, because the scaling-up process is complex and multilayered. This article describes how a successful pilot program to integrate the Standard Days Method (SDM) of family planning into existing Ministry of Health services was scaled up nationally in Rwanda. Much of the success of the scale-up effort was due to systematic use of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) data from several sources to make midcourse corrections. Four lessons learned illustrate this crucially important approach. First, ongoing M&E data showed that provider training protocols and client materials that worked in the pilot phase did not work at scale; therefore, we simplified these materials to support integration into the national program. Second, triangulation of ongoing monitoring data with national health facility and population-based surveys revealed serious problems in supply chain mechanisms that affected SDM (and the accompanying CycleBeads client tool) availability and use; new procedures for ordering supplies and monitoring stockouts were instituted at the facility level. Third, supervision reports and special studies revealed that providers were imposing unnecessary medical barriers to SDM use; refresher training and revised supervision protocols improved provider practices. Finally, informal environmental scans, stakeholder interviews, and key events timelines identified shifting political and health policy environments that influenced scale-up outcomes; ongoing advocacy efforts are addressing these issues. The SDM scale-up experience in Rwanda confirms the importance of monitoring and evaluating programmatic efforts continuously, using a variety of data sources, to improve program outcomes.

  • Received: 2013 Nov 9.
  • Accepted: 2014 Mar 31.
  • © Igras et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Next
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 10 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 10, No. 2
April 28, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda
Susan Igras, Irit Sinai, Marie Mukabatsinda, Fidele Ngabo, Victoria Jennings, Rebecka Lundgren
Global Health: Science and Practice May 2014, ghs1300165; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00165

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda
Susan Igras, Irit Sinai, Marie Mukabatsinda, Fidele Ngabo, Victoria Jennings, Rebecka Lundgren
Global Health: Science and Practice May 2014, ghs1300165; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00165
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Corrigendum: Igras et al., Systems Approach to Monitoring and Evaluation Guides Scale Up of the Standard Days Method of Family Planning in Rwanda
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Use of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention Among Ghanaian Women: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Know-Do Gap: Understanding and Improving Service Quality Among Pharmacies Providing Injectable Contraceptives Through a Mystery Client Study in Nepal
  • Implementation of HIV Retesting During Pregnancy and Postpartum in Kenya: A Cross-Sectional Study
  • Lessons Learned From the Use of the Most Significant Change Technique for Adaptive Management of Complex Health Interventions
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Editorial Board
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2022 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire