Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Supplements
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Supplements
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Building on safety, feasibility, and acceptability: the impact and cost of community health worker provision of injectable contraception

Dawn Chin-Quee, John Bratt, Morrisa Malkin, Mavis Mwale Nduna, Conrad Otterness, Lydia Jumbe and Reuben Kamoto Mbewe
Global Health: Science and Practice October 2013, ghs1300025; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00025
Dawn Chin-Quee
aFHI 360, Division of Health Services Research, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dchin-quee@fhi360.org
John Bratt
aFHI 360, Division of Health Services Research, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Morrisa Malkin
bFHI 360, Division of Research Utilization, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mavis Mwale Nduna
cFHI 360, TB CARE I, Lusaka, Zambia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conrad Otterness
aFHI 360, Division of Health Services Research, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lydia Jumbe
dChildFund Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reuben Kamoto Mbewe
eRepublic of Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

The Zambia project contributes to our understanding of the impact of community-based provision of injectables on method choice and uptake and of the costs of adding DMPA to an established community-based family planning program. The project also illustrates the importance of involving stakeholders from the outset, analyzing costs relevant to scale up, and engaging in policy change dialogue not at the end, but rather throughout project implementation.

Abstract

Background: A critical shortage of doctors, nurses, and midwives in many sub-Saharan African countries inhibits efforts to expand access to family planning services, especially in rural areas. One way to fill this gap is for community health workers (CHWs) to provide injectable contraceptives, an intervention for which there is growing evidence and international support. In 2009, with approval from the Government of Zambia (GoZ), FHI 360 collaborated with ChildFund Zambia to design and implement such an intervention as part of its existing CHW family planning program.

Methods: The safety of CHW provision of injectable DMPA (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate) was measured by client reports and by a 21-item structured observation checklist. Feasibility and acceptability were measured by interviews with CHWs and a subset of DMPA clients. The impact of adding DMPA to pill and condom provision was assessed by family planning uptake among the clients of trained CHWs from February 2010 to February 2011. Costs were documented using spreadsheets over the period November 2009 to February 2011.

Results: Scores were high on all measures of safety, feasibility, and acceptability. Couple-years of protection (CYP, protection from pregnancy for 1 year) was provided to 51 condom clients, 391 pill clients, and 2,206 DMPA clients. Of the 1,739 clients new to family planning, 85% chose injectable DMPA, while 13% chose pills and 2% chose condoms. Continuation rates were also high, at 63% after one year as compared with 47% for pill users. Incremental costs per couple-year were US$21.24 if 50% of users continue with CHW-provided DMPA.

Conclusion: The study affirms that the provision of injectable contraceptives by CHWs is safe, acceptable, and feasible in the Zambian context, with very high rates of uptake in hard-to-reach areas. High continuation rates among clients mean that costs of the intervention can be low when added to an existing community-based distribution program—a finding that is relevant to program replication (now underway in Zambia).

  • Received: 2013 Mar 13.
  • Accepted: 2013 Jul 5.
  • © Chin-Quee et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 10 (3)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 10, No. 3
June 29, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Building on safety, feasibility, and acceptability: the impact and cost of community health worker provision of injectable contraception
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Building on safety, feasibility, and acceptability: the impact and cost of community health worker provision of injectable contraception
Dawn Chin-Quee, John Bratt, Morrisa Malkin, Mavis Mwale Nduna, Conrad Otterness, Lydia Jumbe, Reuben Kamoto Mbewe
Global Health: Science and Practice Oct 2013, ghs1300025; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00025

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Building on safety, feasibility, and acceptability: the impact and cost of community health worker provision of injectable contraception
Dawn Chin-Quee, John Bratt, Morrisa Malkin, Mavis Mwale Nduna, Conrad Otterness, Lydia Jumbe, Reuben Kamoto Mbewe
Global Health: Science and Practice Oct 2013, ghs1300025; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00025
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Pilot Research as Advocacy: The Case of Sayana Press in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Between compliance and resistance: exploring discourses on family planning in Community Health Committees in Mozambique
  • Injectable contraception provided by community-based health workers: one important step toward meeting unmet need
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Where Women Access Contraception in 36 Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Why It Matters
  • Data to Action: A Mixed-Methods Study of Data Use Teams, Improved Availability of Contraceptives in Guinea, Indonesia, Kenya, and Myanmar
  • The Know-Do Gap: Understanding and Improving Service Quality Among Pharmacies Providing Injectable Contraceptives Through a Mystery Client Study in Nepal
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Health Workers
  • Health Topics
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Editorial Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2022 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire