More articles from TAKING EXCEPTION
- Fertility Awareness Methods Are Not Modern Contraceptives: Defining Contraception to Reflect Our Priorities
A recent article in GHSP calls for classifying fertility awareness methods as “modern contraceptives” despite their inferiority. We believe in a rights-based approach, which considers the real-world conditions that many women face, including constrained sexual agency and low baseline reproductive health literacy. We must demonstrate true commitment to increasing access to the most effective and reliable contraceptive methods.
- Response to Austad: Offering a Range of Methods, Including Fertility Awareness Methods, Facilitates Method Choice
When selecting a contraceptive method, women and men consider various attributes in addition to effectiveness, such as side effects, return to fertility, level of medical intervention, and interference with sexual activity. Offering a range of methods, including fertility awareness methods that meet the standard to be considered modern, helps to address these considerations, facilitating method choice.
- A False Dichotomy: RCTs and Their Contributions to Evidence-Based Public Health
Global public health should rely on those research methods that best answer the pressing questions at hand. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other rigorous impact evaluation methods have a critical role to play in public health.
- Response to “A False Dichotomy: RCTs and Their Contributions to Evidence-Based Public Health”
While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can and do make valuable contributions, they also have severe limitations, including in answering the basic question of “Does it work?” and, even more so, in steering how to proceed with complex public health programming at scale. They deserve no exalted position in the pantheon of methodologies for evidence-based public health.