Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS

More articles from EDITORIAL

  • Open Access
    ARVs: The Next Generation. Going Boldly Together to New Frontiers of HIV Treatment
    Matthew Barnhart and James D Shelton
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2015, 3(1):1-11; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00243

    New antiretrovirals (ARVs), particularly the potentially “game-changing” ARV dolutegravir, offer major potential to meet the compelling need for simpler and better HIV treatment for tens of millions of people in the coming decade. Advantages include substantially lower manufacturing cost, fewer side effects, and less risk of resistance. But key obstacles must be addressed in order to develop and introduce new ARVs in specific combinations optimized for the needs of low- and middle-income countries. Strong leadership will be essential from the global health community to nurture more focused collaboration between the private and public sectors.

  • Open Access
    Stunning Popularity of LARCs With Good Access and Quality: A Major Opportunity to Meet Family Planning Needs
    Global Health: Science and Practice March 2015, 3(1):12-13; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00044

    Given true choice, a very high proportion of women, perhaps most, would select one of the long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs)—implants or IUDs—for contraception. If implemented on a wide scale, it would not only drastically alter the current method mix but also serve client needs much better and prevent unintended pregnancy more successfully.

  • You have access
    A better future for injectable contraception?
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2014, 2(4):378-380; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00158
    • Provision of injectables though drug shops appears practicable and can contribute a marked share of family planning services.

    • A potential longer-acting injectable providing at least 6 months of protection appeals to programmatic professionals.

    • Subcutaneous administration of DMPA offers major injectable improvements over the current intramuscular approach.

    • Ironically, while injectable use will inevitably grow, better choice and wider availability of other methods—especially of long-acting and permanent methods—will reduce injectables′ overall share.

  • You have access
    Caution on corticosteroids for preterm delivery: learning from missteps
    Stephen Hodgins
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2014, 2(4):371-373; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00197

    An important new study in lower-level health facilities in low- and middle-income countries found an increased risk of neonatal deaths with corticosteroid use in pregnant women with imminent preterm birth, in contrast with the positive results previously found in high-income countries. The surprising finding demonstrates that context matters. The increase appears largely due to steroids administered in cases that were not actually preterm, probably due to inaccurate pregnancy dating and challenges with diagnostic capacity. Promoting public health often requires decisions based on less-than-perfect evidence, but we must be vigilant about gathering and assessing new evidence and ready to change strategies.

  • You have access
    It's not Ebola … it's the systems
    Victor K Barbiero
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2014, 2(4):374-375; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00186

    The 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa demonstrates key deficiencies in investment in health systems. Despite some modest investment in health systems, our field has instead largely chosen to pursue shorter-term, vertical efforts to more rapidly address key global health issues such as smallpox, polio, malaria, and HIV/AIDS. While those efforts have yielded substantial benefits, we have paid a price for the lack of investments in general systems strengthening. The Ebola deaths we have seen represent a small portion of deaths from many other causes resulting from weak systems. Major systems strengthening including crucial nonclinical elements will not happen overnight but should proceed in a prioritized, systematic way.

  • You have access
    Breaking new ground in family planning communication
    Global Health: Science and Practice December 2014, 2(4):376-377; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00192

    The Urban Reproductive Health Initiative has shown impact on contraceptive use from its communication components even within a few years, as described in 2 GHSP articles. One specifically addressed “ideation” about family planning in detail and was able to show both changes in ideation due to program exposure and correlated changes in contraceptive use. The other used a sophisticated analytical technique that indicated the observed changes in contraceptive use resulted from exposure to the communication efforts, and not just because people more prone to adopt family planning were also more likely to recall exposure to the communication messages.

Pages

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire