Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Supplements
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Supplements
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

The Community Health Systems Reform Cycle: Strengthening the Integration of Community Health Worker Programs Through an Institutional Reform Perspective

Nan Chen, Mallika Raghavan, Joshua Albert, Abigail McDaniel, Lilian Otiso, Richard Kintu, Melissa West and David Jacobstein
Global Health: Science and Practice March 2021, 9(Supplement 1):S32-S46; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00429
Nan Chen
aLast Mile Health, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nchen@lastmilehealth.org
Mallika Raghavan
aLast Mile Health, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua Albert
aLast Mile Health, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abigail McDaniel
aLast Mile Health, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lilian Otiso
bLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Kintu
cThe Palladium Group, Kampala Uganda.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa West
dVillageReach, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Jacobstein
eU.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Jerome Gardiner, a community health assistant in Liberia, displays his COVID-19 job aid. Liberia's community health assistants are a cadre of government-formalized community health workers that are paid, supervised, trained, equipped, and integrated into the public health system. © 2020 Rachel Larson/Last Mile Health.

  • FIGURE
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE

    The Community Health Systems Reform Cycle

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE.

    Key Country Actions by Community Health Systems Reform Cycle Stage

    Problem PrioritizationActors diagnose and frame a compelling problem or opportunity that sets the foundation for the rest of the cycle. A meaningful and relevant problem has been identified, pain points and unmet needs have been defined and, where possible, these are connected to priority areas for reform. Relevant actors acknowledge the need for reform within the community health system, while committing towards a joint vision for addressing gaps.
    Coalition BuildingA group is formed around a compelling problem or vision. Members understand the group and individual roles and goals. Group size and composition is fit for purpose. Diverse membership is established that can fill critical roles for reform (e.g., leaders, connectors, gatekeepers, donors, enablers, change champions, and links to key players outside the coalition).
    Solution GatheringCriteria or priorities are developed to determine how to assess solutions. Potential solutions are gathered, drawing from existing, local, and international ideas and where possible, specific ideas for reform are tested/piloted for effectiveness. Promising solutions are prioritized for integration into the health system.
    DesignKey decision makers, contributors, and authorizers of the reform are identified. These may be a small group, or large multi-sectoral group. Key informants and designers map and understand the different design choices. Where possible, evidence about the different design options and expected cost, impact, and feasibility are identified.
    Through consultations, workshops, and other forums, groups recommend design choices and decision makers are able to validate these choices. This stage includes the design of training materials, operational plans, job descriptions, management tools, data collection systems, supply chain processes, and planning documents which are all necessary for planning.
    ReadinessCoalition actors and champions generate buy-in from actors who will need to play key roles in the launch, rollout, and maintenance of the program, including sharing of key information and knowledge. Stakeholders also translate program design into costed operational plans and implementation guidance. These plans should include a clear “launch” plan, accompanied by strong planning and management tools to ensure smooth rollout.
    Orienting and resourcing stakeholders to fulfill new roles and responsibilities is key. Costed plans inform financing mechanisms to ensure that needed funds are mobilized and can readily flow to the right actors for implementation. Additionally, investment plans for sustainable financing are put in place. Stakeholders identify and address policy/protocol conflicts and integration needs across the health system.
    LaunchKey actors are able to access relevant skills, knowledge, and resources to execute their new roles. New processes and organizational structures are identified, socialized, and then implemented. As these shifts progress, the program reform is implemented in target areas. From implementation, learning is gathered to demonstrate momentum and identify challenges to achieving scale. Particular attention should be paid to roll out challenges to make shifts in design quickly.
    GovernanceDuring this stage, stakeholders establish a project governance framework, which includes key leadership and decision-making bodies, clear roles and responsibilities, and explicit decision rights. It is also critical to establish processes for risk and issue management; stakeholder engagement; and cross-functional communication. As the program evolves, actors monitor and assess progress to advance clear decision making and address critical issues or challenges.
    Management and LearningKey stakeholders regularly review data to inform joint problem solving (e.g., regular program reviews at national and subnational level). These reviews serve to identify and institutionalize reflection points. Continuous improvement within existing program design is a key feature of this stage, in which challenges and changes to program design and other systems bottlenecks are identified.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
    • 20-00429-Chen-Supplement.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 9 (Supplement 1)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 9, No. Supplement 1
March 15, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Community Health Systems Reform Cycle: Strengthening the Integration of Community Health Worker Programs Through an Institutional Reform Perspective
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Community Health Systems Reform Cycle: Strengthening the Integration of Community Health Worker Programs Through an Institutional Reform Perspective
Nan Chen, Mallika Raghavan, Joshua Albert, Abigail McDaniel, Lilian Otiso, Richard Kintu, Melissa West, David Jacobstein
Global Health: Science and Practice Mar 2021, 9 (Supplement 1) S32-S46; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00429

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Community Health Systems Reform Cycle: Strengthening the Integration of Community Health Worker Programs Through an Institutional Reform Perspective
Nan Chen, Mallika Raghavan, Joshua Albert, Abigail McDaniel, Lilian Otiso, Richard Kintu, Melissa West, David Jacobstein
Global Health: Science and Practice Mar 2021, 9 (Supplement 1) S32-S46; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00429
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • BACKGROUND
    • COMMUNITY HEALTH INSTITUTIONALIZATION AS A “REFORM CYCLE”
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Funding
    • Competing interests
    • Footnotes
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Data to Action: A Mixed-Methods Study of Data Use Teams, Improved Availability of Contraceptives in Guinea, Indonesia, Kenya, and Myanmar
  • “Testing Can Be Done Anywhere”: A Qualitative Assessment of Targeted Community-Based Point-of-Care Early Infant Diagnosis of HIV in Lusaka, Zambia
  • A Cross-Sectional Assessment of HIV Self-Testing Preferences and Uptake Among Key Populations in Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Editorial Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2022 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire