Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Supplements
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Supplements
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
EDITORIAL
Open Access

What Potential Authors Should Know About Publishing in Global Health: Science and Practice

Stephen Hodgins and Sonia Abraham
Global Health: Science and Practice September 2021, 9(3):426-427; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00540
Stephen Hodgins
aEditor-in-Chief, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal; Associate Professor, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shodgins@ghspjournal.org
Sonia Abraham
bScientific Editor, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

In 2013, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs launched Global Health: Science and Practice (GHSP), responding to what we saw as an important gap in access to robust program-related evidence in global health. It was our conviction that a new kind of journal1 could both bridge that gap and better serve those engaged directly in program work. Our vision was to contribute to stronger, more effective programs and policies, helping to achieve greater population health impact.2 It has also been our ambition to exercise influence on global health-related publishing more broadly, shifting norms on inquiry into and documentation of program implementation issues, ultimately to better inform global health policy and practice.

The Science of Practice

The “practice” in GHSP’s name has remained a central focus. As with other peer-reviewed journals, we certainly have been striving to contribute to evidence-based practice. What is not so typical of journals in this field, but that has been a central preoccupation for us is practice-based evidence—lessons that can be drawn from actual programs, especially those implemented at scale.

For programs to be more effective and achieve greater impact, the various actors of the system that create and use practice-based evidence need to be better connected.3 Program developers and managers, policy makers, advocates, and researchers need to be in continuous dialog, learning from each other, engaged in work informed by what other actors bring to the table.

“Science” is also centrally important to us, in several ways. Robust evidence on the effectiveness of interventions is certainly of interest to us, so methodologic rigor is an important criterion in our review process. In that respect, GHSP is similar to many other journals. But at least equally important for us is the real-world utility of study findings.

Furthermore, we believe there’s a science to practice; good, critical, reflective practice requires that we bring rigor and objectivity to our program inquiry. We need to take program performance measurement seriously, be open to disconfirming evidence, and be ready to move in new directions if evidence points us there. We believe that those engaged in program work are continuously drawing useful lessons from their work and that rigorously assessing and documenting and then sharing these lessons can benefit others. We’re interested in drawing lessons from exemplary programs, but we’re equally interested in those that have struggled. We’re concerned with what works (and doesn’t work), under what conditions, to achieve impact at scale on a sustained basis.

There is rich learning to be had from things that don't work as well as we planned. We understand that the success of a program is almost invariably attributable not only to the intervention itself but to a complex and dynamic interaction between the intervention and the specific context in which it is delivered. At GHSP, we expect authors to provide sufficient detail on the setting or context to allow readers to understand the interplay between intervention and context so they can make better-informed judgments of transferability to their own work settings. An important part of what we do at GHSP is to provide a platform for sharing such insights.

How Do We Understand Rigor at GHSP?

Certainly, experimental designs provide stronger evidence for causal inference, but we don’t believe in an evidence hierarchy that automatically places randomized controlled trials and meta-analytic systematic reviews at the pinnacle. There are other kinds of evidence and other ways of understanding rigor or robustness that may be equally relevant when we’re trying to understand what works in the real world.

We are not saying that rigor, as conventionally understood, is not important. What we may think of as research principles certainly apply to program-based evidence. Authors need to be thinking about measurement validity, representativeness, counterfactuals and comparators, confounding, appropriate analytic methods, and sound causal reasoning. Even in opinion pieces, such as viewpoints and commentaries, authors need to offer well-supported arguments.

Promoting Local Voices and Perspectives

Although work is often done in low- and middle-income countries by researchers based in high-income countries, it’s problematic for us when we receive articles on which the authors are overwhelmingly from high-income countries. This is not only a matter of fairness and equity but also of validity. Articles reflecting only an external perspective neglect valuable insights into the realities and nuances of the local system that authors and actors in LMICs can provide.4 We want to ensure that in-country authors are engaged and meaningfully contributing to documenting and making sense of practice-based evidence.

Similarly, though we welcome papers from donor-funded, in-country projects, we are especially interested in articles that reflect the input and perspective of those working in ministries of health and other in-country institutions.

Over the past year, we have intentionally refocused efforts to ensure that the articles we publish adequately reflect in-country voice and perspective. Last year, we updated our editorial policies to reflect our efforts to ensure that articles reporting findings from specific countries have meaningful participation from in-country authors.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Similarly, last year,5 we recognized a need for a greater breadth of perspective within our associate editorial team and editorial board and greater diversity in gender, race, ethnicity, and geography. Appointing Abdulmumin Saad as deputy editor-in-chief and recruiting Rajani Ved as an associate editor were among the first steps in bringing broader programmatic expertise and experience as well as diverse perspectives and insights to our editorial team.

We are continuing to identify new editorial board members who can bring valuable research and program experience to help inform GHSP’s vision in the future.

Eliminating Barriers to Publishing

In the field of open-access peer-reviewed journals, GHSP has the luxury of publishing articles with no submission fees to authors because of our special funding arrangements with USAID. This allows us to eliminate financial barriers disproportionately affecting early-career professionals and individuals in low- and middle-income countries, as they seek to share learning.6 To ensure access for authors who are under-represented in peer-reviewed journals, we aim to continue to publish GHSP without fees.

We recognize that we still have much to do in realizing our mission to contribute to more effective health programs and greater population health impact. We invite readers, authors, and reviewers to work with us toward this end and invite your suggestions on how we can do a better job.

Notes

Cite this article as: Hodgins S, Abraham S. What potential authors should know about publishing in Global Health: Science and Practice. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021;9(3):426-427. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00540

  • Accepted: August 12, 2021.
  • Published: September 30, 2021.
  • © Hodgins and Abraham.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00540

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Shelton JD,
    2. Waldman RJ
    . A journal for global health programming. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(1):3–4. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00001. pmid:25276510
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Salem RM,
    2. Hodgins S
    . Global Health: Science and Practice … 5 years in. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6(2):228–231. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00196. pmid:29959267
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Abimbola S
    . The uses of knowledge in global health. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(4):e005802. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005802. pmid:33820807
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Naidoo AV,
    2. Hodkinson P,
    3. Lai King L,
    4. Wallis LA
    . African authorship on African papers during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(3):e004612. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004612. pmid:33648979
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Abraham S,
    2. Hodgins S,
    3. Saad A,
    4. Short Fabic M
    . What is Global Health: Science and Practice doing to address power imbalances in publishing? Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020;8(3):325–326. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00453. pmid:33008848
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Pai M
    . How prestige journals remain elite, exclusive and exclusionary. Forbes. Accessed August 12, 2021. https://www.forbes.com/sites/madhukarpai/2020/11/30/how-prestige-journals-remain-elite-exclusive-and-exclusionary/?sh=35eb0ea54d48
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 9 (3)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 9, No. 3
September 30, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What Potential Authors Should Know About Publishing in Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What Potential Authors Should Know About Publishing in Global Health: Science and Practice
Stephen Hodgins, Sonia Abraham
Global Health: Science and Practice Sep 2021, 9 (3) 426-427; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00540

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
What Potential Authors Should Know About Publishing in Global Health: Science and Practice
Stephen Hodgins, Sonia Abraham
Global Health: Science and Practice Sep 2021, 9 (3) 426-427; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00540
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • The Science of Practice
    • How Do We Understand Rigor at GHSP?
    • Promoting Local Voices and Perspectives
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
    • Eliminating Barriers to Publishing
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Let’s Make Life Easier for Health Workers, Not More Complicated
  • COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy
  • A Call to Action: Reinvigorating Interest and Investments in Health Infrastructure
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2022 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire