Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Sign up for Alerts
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • News
    • GHSP Call for Papers
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Sign up for Alerts
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • News
    • GHSP Call for Papers
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
FIELD ACTION REPORT
Open Access

Remote Interviewer Training for COVID-19 Data Collection: Challenges and Lessons Learned From 3 Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa

Shani Turke, Sarah Nehrling, Samuel Olanipekun Adebayo, Pierre Akilimali, Ivan Idiodi, Anthony Mwangi, Elizabeth Larson, Caroline Moreau and Philip Anglewicz
Global Health: Science and Practice March 2021, 9(1):177-186; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00468
Shani Turke
aBill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sturke1@jh.edu
Sarah Nehrling
bGarabam Consulting, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Olanipekun Adebayo
cCentre for Research, Evaluation Resources and Development, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre Akilimali
dKinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivan Idiodi
cCentre for Research, Evaluation Resources and Development, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Mwangi
eInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Mombasa, Kenya.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Larson
aBill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Moreau
fDepartment of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
gSoins et santé. Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM 1018 Villejuif, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Anglewicz
aBill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
fDepartment of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE

    The Remote Interviewer Training System for the Performance Monitoring for Action COVID-19 Survey, March 2020

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Screenshot of the Virtual RollCall Implemented by the International Centre for Reproductive Health in Kenya to Assess if Interviewers Were Present and Following the Remote Training.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE.

    Advantages and Limitations of Implementing Remote Interviewer Trainings and Factors to Consider When Deciding on Approach

    Remote Training AdvantagesRemote Training Limitations
    • Allows some interviewer training safely during a global pandemic

    • Builds confidence, skills, and familiarity with remote training, to leverage future remote learning if necessary

    • Enables cross-country and cross-language knowledge sharing to create standardized materials

    • Enables participants to watch prerecorded content multiple times and on their own schedule

    • Requires preparing multiple back up options in anticipation of Internet connectivity or technology issues

    • Necessitates additional training in remote facilitation for training facilitators

    • Limits opportunities for organic learning from discussion or practical application

    • Demands significant human resources to design, develop, and deploy the training systemRequires group tolerance for the risks and potential delays

    Ideal Circumstances for Remote TrainingCircumstances That Do Not Favor Remote Training
    • Access to at least an intermittent Internet connection

    • Ability to distribute select materials to interviewers, such as a training manual and smartphone, to engage in remote learning

    • An established and cohesive field team, enabling an environment conducive to attempting new ways of learning

    • Experienced interviewers, with sufficient background knowledge on protocols and survey content to minimize training time

    • Simple survey content that builds on interviewers' previous experiences

    • Familiarity across the study team with at least a few common applications that could be used for remote learning

    • Internet connection is unavailable or unreliable for large portions of training time

    • Printed materials and common familiar applications cannot be ensured

    • Field team is new, or trust and familiarity are still being developed across a team

    • Training content is lengthy or significantly complex

    • In-person practical application is essential to learning

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 9 (1)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 9, No. 1
March 31, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Remote Interviewer Training for COVID-19 Data Collection: Challenges and Lessons Learned From 3 Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Remote Interviewer Training for COVID-19 Data Collection: Challenges and Lessons Learned From 3 Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa
Shani Turke, Sarah Nehrling, Samuel Olanipekun Adebayo, Pierre Akilimali, Ivan Idiodi, Anthony Mwangi, Elizabeth Larson, Caroline Moreau, Philip Anglewicz
Global Health: Science and Practice Mar 2021, 9 (1) 177-186; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00468

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Remote Interviewer Training for COVID-19 Data Collection: Challenges and Lessons Learned From 3 Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa
Shani Turke, Sarah Nehrling, Samuel Olanipekun Adebayo, Pierre Akilimali, Ivan Idiodi, Anthony Mwangi, Elizabeth Larson, Caroline Moreau, Philip Anglewicz
Global Health: Science and Practice Mar 2021, 9 (1) 177-186; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00468
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • PERFORMANCE MONITORING FOR ACTION
    • CHALLENGES TO REMOTE TRAINING
    • LESSONS LEARNED
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Funding
    • Author contributions
    • Competing interests
    • Translation
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Uptake and Short-Term Retention in HIV Treatment Among Men in South Africa: The Coach Mpilo Pilot Project
  • Discovery of a Hidden Schistosomiasis Endemic in the Salamat Region of Chad, Africa
  • Key Factors Influencing Use of Immunization Cost Evidence in Country Planning and Budgeting Processes: Experiences From Indonesia, Tanzania, and Vietnam
Show more FIELD ACTION REPORT

Similar Articles

US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Editorial Board
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2022 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire