Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • 5 Year Anniversary Infographic
  • More
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
    • Website Policies
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • 5 Year Anniversary Infographic
  • More
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
    • Website Policies
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Health Care Worker Preferences and Perspectives on Doses per Container for 2 Lyophilized Vaccines in Senegal, Vietnam, and Zambia

Natasha Kanagat, Kirstin Krudwig, Karen A. Wilkins, Sydney Kaweme, Guissimon Phiri, Frances D. Mwansa, Mercy Mvundura, Joanie Robertson, Debra Kristensen, Abdoulaye Gueye, Sang D. Dao, Pham Q. Thai, Huyen T. Nguyen and Thang C. Tran
Global Health: Science and Practice December 2020, 8(4):680-688; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00112
Natasha Kanagat
aJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Arlington, VA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: natasha_kanagat@jsi.com
Kirstin Krudwig
aJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Arlington, VA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen A. Wilkins
bConsultant, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Arlington, VA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sydney Kaweme
bConsultant, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Arlington, VA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guissimon Phiri
cRepublic of Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frances D. Mwansa
cRepublic of Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mercy Mvundura
dPATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanie Robertson
dPATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra Kristensen
ePATH, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdoulaye Gueye
fPATH, Dakar, Senegal.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang D. Dao
gPATH, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pham Q. Thai
hNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huyen T. Nguyen
gPATH, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thang C. Tran
gPATH, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Key Findings

  • Health care workers (HCWs) in all 3 countries preferred containers with fewer doses for reconstituted vaccines such as BCG and measles-containing vaccine.

  • HCWs believed that containers with fewer doses of these vaccines could reduce wastage and missed vaccination opportunities.

  • HCWs were more willing to open a vial for every eligible child when using containers with fewer doses.

Key Implications

  • Policy makers should consider HCW perspectives when deliberating a change in policy on vial size since HCWs have to balance concerns about open vial wastage with the guidance to open a vial to vaccinate every eligible child.

  • Program managers should consider shifting to containers with fewer doses for vaccines without preservatives to assuage HCW concerns about opening vials for every eligible child while managing wastage.

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Limited information exists on health care workers’ (HCWs) perceptions about use of multidose vaccine vials and their preferences about doses per container (DPC). We present findings from qualitative studies conducted in Senegal, Vietnam, and Zambia to explore HCWs’ behavior regarding opening vials and their perceptions and preferences for the number of doses in vials of BCG and measles-containing vaccine (MCV). Zambia and Senegal currently offer MCV in 10-dose vials and BCG in 20-dose vials; 10-dose vials are used for both vaccines in Vietnam. Unused doses in vials of these reconstituted vaccines must be discarded within 6 hours.

Methods:

Key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted with frontline HCWs in Senegal, Vietnam, and Zambia. In Senegal and Vietnam, the KIIs were conducted as part of broader formative research; in Zambia, KIIs were conducted in control districts using 10-dose MCV vials only and in intervention districts that switched from 10- to 5-dose vials during the study. During analysis, themes common to all 3 countries were synthesized. Critical themes relevant to country contexts were also examined.

Results:

HCWs in all 3 countries preferred containers with fewer doses for BCG and MCV to reduce wastage and increase the likelihood of vaccinating every eligible child. HCWs in Senegal and HCWs using 10-dose vials in Zambia reported sending unvaccinated children away because not enough children were present to warrant opening a new vial. In Vietnam, where sessions are typically held monthly, and in Zambia when the 5-dose vials were used, almost all HCWs reported opening a vial of MCV for even 1 child.

Discussion:

HCWs prefer vials with fewer DPC. Their concerns about balancing coverage and wastage influence their decisions to vaccinate every eligible child; and their perspectives are crucial to ensuring that all target populations are reached with vaccines in a timely manner.

  • Received: March 14, 2020.
  • Accepted: August 26, 2020.
  • Published: December 23, 2020.
  • © Kanagat et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00112

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 8 (4)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 8, No. 4
December 23, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Health Care Worker Preferences and Perspectives on Doses per Container for 2 Lyophilized Vaccines in Senegal, Vietnam, and Zambia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Health Care Worker Preferences and Perspectives on Doses per Container for 2 Lyophilized Vaccines in Senegal, Vietnam, and Zambia
Natasha Kanagat, Kirstin Krudwig, Karen A. Wilkins, Sydney Kaweme, Guissimon Phiri, Frances D. Mwansa, Mercy Mvundura, Joanie Robertson, Debra Kristensen, Abdoulaye Gueye, Sang D. Dao, Pham Q. Thai, Huyen T. Nguyen, Thang C. Tran
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2020, 8 (4) 680-688; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Health Care Worker Preferences and Perspectives on Doses per Container for 2 Lyophilized Vaccines in Senegal, Vietnam, and Zambia
Natasha Kanagat, Kirstin Krudwig, Karen A. Wilkins, Sydney Kaweme, Guissimon Phiri, Frances D. Mwansa, Mercy Mvundura, Joanie Robertson, Debra Kristensen, Abdoulaye Gueye, Sang D. Dao, Pham Q. Thai, Huyen T. Nguyen, Thang C. Tran
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2020, 8 (4) 680-688; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00112
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • En français
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Test and Prevent: Evaluation of a Pilot Program Linking Clients With Negative HIV Test Results to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Zimbabwe
  • Pathways to Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and HIV/AIDS Comorbidities in Soweto, South Africa: An Ethnographic Study
  • Levels, Trends, and Inequalities in Using Institutional Delivery Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Stratified Analysis by Facility Type
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Editorial Board
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire