Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Sign up for Alerts
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • News
    • GHSP Call for Papers
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Sign up for Alerts
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • News
    • GHSP Call for Papers
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Are We Using the Right Approach to Change Newborn Care Practices in the Community? Qualitative Evidence From Ethiopia and Northern Nigeria

Zelee Hill, Pauline Scheelbeek, Yashua Hamza, Yared Amare and Joanna Schellenberg
Global Health: Science and Practice September 2020, 8(3):383-395; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00410
Zelee Hill
aUniversity College London, London, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: z.hill@ucl.ac.uk
Pauline Scheelbeek
bLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yashua Hamza
cChildCare and Wellness Clinics, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yared Amare
dConsultancy for Social Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanna Schellenberg
bLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Key Findings

  • In Ethiopia, high community-level exposure to consistent messages and the perceptions of community health workers (CHWs) drove behav-ior change.

  • In Nigeria, exposure to messages was limited, CHW were less trusted, and behavior change was reported less frequently.

Key Implications

  • The role of saturation and trust in behavior change in Ethiopia suggests that CHW counseling interventions should not be assumed to work through didactic provision of messages that focus on the behavior benefits.

  • In settings with low coverage of CHW visits, low levels of message reinforcement from other sources, and low trust in CHWs, achieving behavior change may be difficult, even among people who receive visits.

ABSTRACT

Changing behaviors is usually a core component of the role of community health workers (CHWs), but little is known about the mechanisms through which they change behavior. We collected qualitative data from 8 sites in Ethiopia and northern Nigeria where CHWs were active to understand how they change newborn care behaviors. In each country, we conducted 12 narrative interviews and 12–13 in-depth interviews with recent mothers and 4 focus group discussions each with mothers, fathers, grandmothers, and CHWs. We identified 2 key mechanisms of behavior change. The first was linked to the frequency and consistency of hearing messages that led to a perception that change had occurred in community-wide behaviors, collective beliefs, and social expectations. The second was linked to trust in the CHW, obligation, and hierarchy. We found little evidence that constructs that often inform the design of counseling approaches, such as knowledge of causality and perceived risks and benefits, were mechanisms of change.

INTRODUCTION

Community health workers (CHWs) are central to efforts to reduce neonatal mortality in many low-income settings,1 and prenatal or postnatal home visits by CHWs are a key component of their role.2 A meta-analysis of 8 cluster-randomized studies of home visits by CHWs reported that such visits could reduce neonatal mortality by 11% (risk ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.85, 0.94), with the reduction being greater in settings with high mortality and low facility delivery rates.1 Although CHWs vary regarding payment and training,3 changing caregiver behaviors is usually a core component of their role.

In many cases, CHWs facilitate behavior change through the use of counseling cards that include written instructions for the CHW and pictures to help families understand and remember the benefit of the behavior.4 The mother is usually the target of the visits, but including other family members is often encouraged. The counseling approach often focuses on information-centric interpersonal communication, and it is informed by theoretical models developed in high-income settings.5,6 These theories are driven by constructs such as rationality, autonomy, self-interest, and material progression. This approach is exemplified in a recent review of caregiver behavior change in low- and middle-income countries that described the need for caregivers to know about the causal link between the behavior and survival, perceive that a risk exists, experience self-efficacy, have the resources to overcome environmental constraints, and decide to engage in the beneficial practice.7 It has been argued that in some low-income settings constructs such as interdependence, relationships, trust, obligation, and collective decision making may be more salient.5,8,9 There have been calls for more research to understand the mechanisms through which CHW interventions change behavior—the inner workings of the system—so they can be better designed and targeted.5,10–12

Current evidence suggests that CHWs are much more than conduits of information. A common theme among studies exploring how CHWs effect change is that they can serve as brokers and connectors.11,13–16 They achieve this through connecting people with services, using local networks,13 engaging with influencers,12,17 and advocating for external resources or appealing to authorities.17–19 Having an empathetic, caring, and trusting relationship with the community is considered fundamental to the workers’ success.11,14,15,20–23 Trust comes from CHWs being embedded in the community—that is, an “insider”—whom community members identify with and have confidence in.13,14 Being an insider also means that CHWs understand and are direct witnesses to communities’ needs and challenges and are well placed to know how to address them.12,13,24 CHWs can engage with community members and build rapport with them; use appropriate terms to talk about health (e.g., through local idioms or songs); use their own personal testimonies of behavior change or act as role models; package benefits to be appealing and salient to community members; and identify relevant strategies for behavior change such as persistence and repetition.11–14,17,19–22,24,25 CHWs have also been seen to affect change by taking on out-of-scope tasks or using personal resources to facilitate their role.11–13,17,21,22,25

Current evidence suggests that CHWs are much more than conduits of information.

CHWs also differ from other community members due to their training, skills, and association with the health system, which places them as “outsiders.” As such, they can have increased acceptance, respect, and status.13,14,21,23,24 Trust in CHWs as outsiders can be part of a broader system of hierarchical trust in authorities,21 which may result in community members feeling obliged to follow advice from CHWs26 and may reduce a community’s ability to make informed decisions.21

Trust and credibility can be lost if CHWs do not meet community expectations, for example, if they lack supplies or demonstrate poor capabilities or when communities doubt their motives.11,13,16,23 Motives can be questioned when CHWs are perceived as not working for the interest of the community but as having alliances elsewhere,16 either because of the selection process22 or because there is a widescale distrust of authorities.22

In this article, we report data from both CHWs and the community, exploring how CHWs change newborn care behaviors in Ethiopia and northeast Nigeria. We use an approach informed by realist evaluation to identify the mechanisms and the contextual factors that influence change.27 In Ethiopia, we focus on health extension workers (HEW) and the Health Development Army (HDA) leaders who were supported by the Last Ten Kilometers (L10K) program, and we compare our findings with those from northeast Nigeria around the role of community volunteers supported by the Society for Family Health (SFH).

METHODS

Study Setting Selection and Characteristics

Data were collected between March and June 2015 in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Region and the Amhara region in Ethiopia and in Gombe state in Nigeria. Table 1 shows the key characteristics of the CHWs in both sites. In Ethiopia, HEWs underwent 1 year of training, were paid about $100 a month, and served around 5,000 people. They provided health promotion and disease prevention and treatment, and they worked both at their health post and in the community.28,29 In Gombe, Nigeria, the CHWs were women from the Federation of Muslim Women’s Association in urban areas and traditional birth attendants in rural areas. They underwent 5–6 days of training and were volunteers, but they received incentives for accompanying women to facilities for delivery and for referring women with danger signs.30

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Characteristics of Community Health Workers in Nigeria and Ethiopia

In both the Ethiopian and Nigerian sites, CHWs made prenatal and postnatal home visits, which included promoting neonatal care practices and service utilization. In Ethiopia, the HEWs also provided counseling during antenatal care at health posts, and all women were part of the HDA. The HDA members were meant to work in small groups with a leader whose role included helping families adopt the HEW messages by identifying pregnant women and linking them to services, holding monthly meetings, and running participatory learning and action cycles. The HDA leaders were selected by their group, were volunteers, and received an average of 15 days of training facilitated by the HEWs.31–34

With the assistance of L10K and SFH program staff, we identified 4 study sites in each country that had CHWs in place who were considered to be active. In Ethiopia, we selected 4 kebeles (districts) that had no unusual characteristics such as being near an industrial center or a tertiary hospital. In Nigeria, we selected 4 local government areas (LGAs) (districts)—2 urban and 2 rural. Insurgents were active at the time of data collection, which meant that the study team needed to return to the state capital each day, and LGA selection was limited to sites that were within a few hours drive of the state capital. In Ethiopia, data collectors were able to access study sites that were more remote. Table 2 shows the characteristics of the selected study sites. The access to health care described in the Table was determined by the fieldworkers based on distance to the nearest health centers, availability of transport, and the general road conditions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Characteristics of Study Sites in Ethiopia and Nigeria

Behaviors

Interventions that have the greatest impact on neonatal mortality are those that improve care in labor, during birth, in the first week of life, and for small and sick babies.35 Interventions to improve immediate newborn care such as thermal care (drying and wrapping, skin-to-skin care, delayed bathing), hygienic cord care, and early initiation of breastfeeding are central to these interventions,36 and CHWs often promote these behaviors. To explore behaviors in sufficient depth, we focused on thermal care and breastfeeding behaviors. Specifically, we focused on the following behaviors: drying the newborn and either placing it in skin-to-skin contact with the mother or wrapping the newborn after delivery if skin-to-skin contact was not possible; delayed bathing; and immediate and exclusive breastfeeding.37

Interventions having the greatest impact on neonatal mortality are those that improve care in labor, during birth, in the first week of life, and for small and sick babies.

Interview and Focus Group Discussion Guide Development

The interview guides included free-flowing questions, such as a description of labor, delivery, and newborn care, to allow unanticipated themes to emerge (Table 3). These questions were followed by theory-driven questions identified from the study theoretical framework (Figure), which hypothesizes a set of mechanisms through which CHWs could change neonatal breastfeeding and thermal care behaviors, and the contexts that may enable or constrain these mechanisms. The framework was developed using a realist evaluation approach,27 the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior) model,38 a review of behavior change theories from a range of disciplines,39–42 a systematic review of neonatal care practices in sub-Saharan Africa,43 and discussions with implementers in the 2 countries. All guides were pretested and amended as needed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Data Collection Method, Sample Size per Country, and Content in Ethiopia and Nigeria

FIGURE.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE.

Hypothesized Mechanisms Through Which Community Health Workers Could Affect Neonatal Care Practices and the Contexts that May Influence the Mechanisms in Ethiopia and Nigeria

Abbreviation: CHW, community health worker.

Data Collection

Narrative and in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with mothers at their houses. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with mothers, grandmothers, fathers, and CHWs in a neutral location, such as a school for community members and the health centers for CHWs. Having multiple respondent groups allowed us to capture different perspectives and to triangulate findings. We conducted narratives with mothers to understand their experiences and to see how events influenced each other and IDIs to capture perceptions. FGDs were conducted with 3–7 participants each to explore issues that would benefit from being discussed. We enhanced FGD interaction and reduced social desirability bias through activity-oriented exercises.44 Interviews and FGDs lasted between 45 minutes and 2.5 hours.

Community respondents were identified through community informants, such as women’s organization leaders, by the CHWs, at places of worship, and through snowball sampling. As we were interested in the mechanisms through which CHWs change behavior, we excluded respondents who had no contact with these cadres. In Ethiopia, due to the small numbers of HEWs in a kebele, all HEWs in the study kebele and those from neighboring kebeles were invited to participate in the FGDs. The SFH CHWs in Nigeria were identified with assistance from SFH and through snowball sampling. For mother interviews, we aimed to get a range of participants regarding age, educational level, parity, sex of newborn, and place of delivery.

Data were collected in local languages by 4–6 interviewers in each country. In Ethiopia, interpreters were occasionally needed to translate from Amharic into Silte. Interviewers were social science graduates with 2–17 years of qualitative research experience. They received 4 days of classroom training, which included a detailed review and discussion of the content of the guides, probing strategies, transcription, and ethics. This training was followed by a 2-day field pilot.

Interviewers approached potential community respondents in their homes and CHWs at their homes or health posts, explained the study, obtained written informed consent, and arranged a convenient time for the interview. Three respondents declined to be interviewed, stating that they were too busy. Interviews and FGDs were audio recorded, transcribed, and translated into English by the interviewers during data collection with conceptual and, where possible, semantic equivalence.45

Data collection stopped when additional interviews and FGDs did not provide new information. This point was determined by frequent transcript reviews and through discussions with interviewers. The sample size, respondent groups, and the interview content are shown in Table 2.

Ethical approval was granted by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Ethiopia, the National Research Ethics Committee and the Gombe State Government in Nigeria, and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom.

Data Analysis

Analysis began during data collection through regular team meetings and 2 data analysis workshops to discuss emerging themes, receive feedback on transcripts, remove or add questions, and increase reflexivity. These initial themes and the theoretical framework were used to develop a deductive coding template in Nvivo. Interviews and FGDs were then coded inductively within these broad themes, with new themes added as they emerged. Coding and interpretation were done separately for each country by 4 of the senior researchers (ZH, YH, YA, and PS), who initially read through the transcripts to identify a first set of inductive themes and codes and to get an impression of the data as a whole. To enhance coding rigor and conceptual thinking, initial coding was done through consensus coding of the same transcripts, a code book was developed, and the team regularly met to discuss coding. Each analyst then took a set of transcripts to code. The study lead author (ZH) checked all coding using the coding stripe function of Nvivo. Coding discussions focused around merging conceptually similar codes and examining patterns, links, and contradictions in the data. We triangulated findings between respondent groups and data collection methods to check credibility. Due to logistical constraints and literacy issues, we were unable to return transcripts to participants for comment.

RESULTS

Table 4 shows the characteristics of the narrative and IDI respondents. Respondents had a range of ages, education levels, parities, and religion. We did not achieve the planned diversity in place of delivery possibly because we were working in more accessible areas (close to the state capital in Gombe state and within walking distance of a motorable road in Ethiopia), in areas where CHWs were active, and with women who had received at least 1 visit by a CHW. In addition, CHWs assisted in identifying some respondents and may have favored those who delivered in a facility.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Sample Characteristics of Mothers in Narrative and In-Depth Interviews in Ethiopia and Nigeria

The FGD participant mothers varied in age (range 20–40 years), parity (range 1–8 children), education (none to secondary level), and ethnicity. The FGD participant fathers were older (range 28–61 years of age), and the FGD participant grandmothers were almost all uneducated.

Most families interviewed in Ethiopia reported that they adopted the practices that the HEWs and HDA leaders promoted, and they highlighted that it was a change from their past behaviors:

In previous time, the baby was bathed immediately after birth, but now, based on the teaching of health post and health center, we wrap the baby immediately after birth. — Father, FGD Kebele C, Ethiopia

The previous and the current situations … . are like the earth and the sky. —Father, FGD Kebele C, Ethiopia

Most families interviewed in Ethiopia reported adopting practices promoted by the HEWs and HDA leaders, which differed from past behaviors.

Skin-to-skin care was the only thermal care practice that was reported as not being promoted, and this practice was new to most of the community respondents.

We identified 2 interlinked mid-range theories relating to how HEW interactions with families influenced the promoted practices in Ethiopia—saturation and trust theories. A third theory, facility behavior, was identified but applied only in the context of women who delivered in a facility.

The saturation theory describes a set of mechanisms that relate to families receiving consistent messages, reinforced by multiple sources (HEW, HDA leaders, and health workers) at multiple time points (before pregnancy, pregnancy, and at delivery) and through multiple channels (community meetings, home visits, antenatal care, and at delivery):

We are told not to give anything until 6 months . … [By] [HDA leader] [HEW], and we are told in the health center or when we go to the health post for vaccination [antenatal care]. —Mother, IDI, Kebele D, Ethiopia

I heard this advice before, but when they give me additional advice it strengthen the idea…the HEWs advised me that the baby should not be bathed immediately after birth, and it was the same thing that the health professionals advised me. —Mother, IDI, Kebele A, Ethiopia

This saturation of messages led to high levels of community-wide familiarity with the promoted behaviors, with social diffusion further reinforcing the messages:

I didn’t hear that with my ears but I heard a rumor that if you delivered at health facility you have to bathe [the baby] after 3 days. —Mother, Narrative 1, Kebele D, Ethiopia

Saturation of messages led to high levels of community-wide familiarity with promoted behaviors, with social diffusion further reinforcing the messages.

This familiarity led to a perception that there had been a change in collective beliefs and practices and a social expectation that the new behaviors should be practiced:

No one [in the family or community] suggested bathing the baby immediately … They all know that the baby should be bathed after spending a day. —Mother, Narrative, Kebele C, Ethiopia

It is the same [people’s behavior], it has no difference. They [others] have received the lesson . … They have received the same lesson as me. —Mother, Narrative, Kebele C, Ethiopia

The HEWs attributed message penetration to the formation of the HDA, whose members were able to have more frequent contacts with households. This attribution was confirmed by some community respondents.

Having messages provided from multiple sources meant that even if a worker was less active, messages were still heard. For example, in 1 study site, HEWs were reported as being relatively inactive in making home visits, but most women still received messages from other sources.

Grandmothers were also familiar with the promoted behaviors and, with the exception of delayed bathing, were generally supportive of them, recognizing that this was a new time:

It is our children who advise us about what they know … Today’s mothers are wise. In previous time, there was no education. —Grandmother, FGD, Kebele D, Ethiopia

Grandmothers were also familiar with the promoted behaviors and were generally supportive of them.

As a result of being “educated” about the practices, mothers had increased maternal agency and felt more knowledgeable than their “outdated” elders and more able to reject their advice:

These days, they [HEW] give us good education on how to take care of babies … my families are getting older … So even though they give us advice, we would not follow that … I follow my own way. —Mother, Narrative, Kebele B, Ethiopia

Overall, fathers were less familiar with the details of the behaviors being promoted, but they were supportive of the CHWs and health worker advice, as illustrated in this conversation in one FGD:

Previously … . our mothers decided. —Father A, FGD, Kebela A, Ethiopia

Now I can decide that it [food] should not be given before 6 months. —Father B, FGD, Kebele A, Ethiopia

Because health professionals teach this. —Father A, FGD, Kebela A, Ethiopia

Familiarity with the messages was important, but knowledge of the benefit of the behavior was not a prerequisite for adoption. For example, although many respondents could report that delayed bathing helped maintain warmth, several did not know the reason for the practice but still reported that they carried it out. In these cases, the trust theory was the driver of change:

I do what they told me to do; I waited the time and bathed the baby … I was thinking it could not be harmful; they said this because it is useful. —Mother, IDI, Kebele D, Ethiopia

Familiarity with the messages was important, but knowledge of the benefit of the behavior was not a prerequisite for adoption.

The trust theory relates to a trust in the CHWs and health workers as a collective to act in the community’s interest, leading families to follow the advice given:

They [mothers] listen to the HEW, even if they tell you that you have to walk naked. —Grandmother, FGD, Kebele C, Ethiopia

Trust was related to CHWs’ high status in that they were “better” and “more educated” than community members:

I was advised about it before delivery. I accept what they told me because they know better. —Mother, Narrative, Kebele C, Ethiopia

We just respect educated people. They are educated, and we are just farmers. —Mother, IDI, Kebele A, Ethiopia

Trust was also related to CHWs being seen as connected to the government, as well as to their visibility, connectedness, and understanding of the community.

Although the HEWs as a collective were trusted as acting in the community’s interest, this trust could be lost for individual HEWs, for example, if they provided inequitable services, had a poor work ethic, took bribes, or were unkind:

They [HEWs] are not responsible enough to carry out their tasks … they want you to give them something as a bribe … . if she doesn’t give something as a bribe, the woman won’t get any service … they did not have good manner. —Mother, IDI 5, Kebele B, Ethiopia

Trust could be lost for individual HEWs if they provided inequitable services, had a poor work ethic, took bribes, or were unkind.

Trust in the HEWs and their status were combined with a hierarchical relationship that resulted in families feeling obligated to follow the advice of HEWs. This circumstance is illustrated by community respondents describing behaviors as “forbidden” or “not allowed” and reporting that the HEWs “commanded” them. This hierarchical relationship was compounded by a belief that the HEWs had the power to make life difficult if advice was not followed, either by being angry with families or denying them services.

HDA leaders did not have the same status as HEW/health workers and were described as “villagers just like us.” They were viewed as conduits of information and were important drivers of the saturation mechanisms but were not drivers of the trust mechanisms:

They give advice as local people, not different from advising as a neighbor. —Father, FGD, Kebele B, Ethiopia

The third theory, centered on facility behavior, relates to the recent increase in facility deliveries, which meant that some family practices had become health worker practices:

When they deliver at the health center, they practice this [immediate breastfeeding] … they practice it mostly because they deliver at the health facility. —CHW, FGD, Kebele A Ethiopia

At a facility delivery, immediate drying and wrapping were done by the health workers, who also could insist on early breastfeeding and no bathing during the stay in the facility.

The 3 theories described above were not triggered equally for all behaviors, with delayed bathing being the most difficult behavior to change. This was related to some families, and in particular grandmothers, having strong culturally entrenched beliefs against leaving the baby “dirty” after birth. This was especially the case if the baby was bloody or had an obvious vernix:

We will bathe the baby anyway, how can we sit idle without bathing the baby. —Mother, IDI, Kebele D, Ethiopia

Another contextual factor that enhanced the uptake of behaviors was the value given to education and modernity:

Do you think I want to do like in the past? I want it to be just like the modern time … Today’s mothers are young and modern. They easily accept new ideas. —Mother, Narrative Kebele C, Ethiopia

In the Nigerian sites, there were fewer reports of behaviors being changed, and the impact of saturation was less striking than in Ethiopia, as messages were received less often and from fewer sources. There was less evidence of a change in collective beliefs as well as more cultural barriers to behavior change, especially when mothers received conflicting advice:

… I gave water on the third day … I am confused with the advice I am getting, some say give, some say do not give. —Mother, Narrative, LGA C, Nigeria

In the Nigerian sites, there were fewer reports of behaviors being changed, and the impact of saturation was less striking than in Ethiopia.

As in Ethiopia, CHWs were generally trusted in the Nigeria sites, but fewer respondents reported that they carried out behaviors without knowing their benefits:

I’ll follow the ways that I already know, I’ll follow the old ways until I hear more explanation on it. —Mother, Narrative, LGA C, Nigeria

As in Ethiopia being “educated” by a CHW allowed some mothers to challenge the advice of elders, and a theme in the grandmother FGDs emerged around times changing and their advice no longer being relevant:

We the old grandmothers are in trouble. We have been swept into the dustbin. —Grandmother, FGD, LGA A, Nigeria

But in many households, elders remained key influencers of newborn care with a strong family hierarchy. For example, several mothers reported they followed or pretended to follow the advice of the elders to ensure harmonious relationships.

In many households, elders remained key influencers of newborn care, with a strong family hierarchy.

Unlike in Ethiopia, the facility behavior theory was not a key mechanism of change in Nigeria, as health staff did not practice the behaviors that CHWs were promoting as frequently as in Ethiopia:

At hospital when you deliver, you will be allowed to rest for 1 hour … which in most cases, you will be sleeping. So, you see you don’t even have the time to breastfeed your baby. —Mother, IDI, LGA D, Nigeria

However, a theme emerged around a facility delivery giving women more autonomy in decision making because they were viewed as having adopted and being exposed to modern practice:

She [grandmother] used to say I should breastfeed them, and about water … I should give them … I tell her that in the hospital they told us not to give and she will not force me, she will respect what the hospital says. —Mother, Narrative, LGA A, Nigeria

As in Ethiopia, the mechanisms were not triggered for all behaviors in Nigeria, but in contrast to Ethiopia, delayed bathing was more amenable to behavior change than breastfeeding practices. This was because families had been convinced that the baby could be cleaned adequately by rubbing them with oil rather than bathing them, making delayed bathing culturally acceptable:

They [health worker] clean the baby very well, so baby will not smell, if they leave the baby dirty … then, of course the baby will smell, my baby was very clean so, no problem. —Mother, Narrative, LGA B, Nigeria

DISCUSSION

The saturation and trust theories that we identified in our study sites are similar to findings from previous studies on how CHWs affect change,11,14,15,17,20–23 but are in contrast to the idea that knowledge of a causal link and perception of a risk are needed for behavior change.7 Many behavior change theories include constructs related to psychosocial, environmental, and social network determinants of behaviors,46 yet there can be an overreliance on didactic communication in health promotion.47

The saturation mechanism was linked to frequent and consistent information, which was provided more often in Ethiopia than in Nigeria. Where it occurred, saturation led to a perception that there had been a change in community-wide behaviors, collective beliefs, and social expectations of behaviors. CHW counseling interventions usually focus on changing the behavior of one individual at a time, with less emphasis given to message saturation or exposure.48,49 CHWs themselves have identified the need for persistence and repetition,11,17 and when sufficient in number, positive testimonies from community members about CHWs’ work have been found to create a snowball effect and enhance community-wide trust.21

In the Ethiopian sites, high exposure to consistent information was achieved, but obtaining the same outcome may be difficult in many settings. Few countries have reached more than 10% coverage for postnatal home visits,50 and some evidence suggests that in some settings, CHWs lacked the time, motivation, and support to engage with high-quality behavior change.19 Behavior change may be difficult to achieve in settings with less functional CHW programs, which may in some part explain the difference in the findings between Ethiopia and Nigeria. This difference highlights the importance of context in the design of counseling interventions within CHW programs.

The trust mechanism was related to trust in CHWs, status, obligation, and hierarchy but also to CHWs’ closeness to and understanding of the communities they serve. In Ethiopia, this mechanism was seemingly more important than individuals being convinced of the specific benefit of a behavior. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of relationships, trust, and power between CHWs and the community, and the impact that these factors can have on acceptability, motivation, and performance.11,13,–16,20–24,26,51–53 We demonstrate the centrality of this relationship to behavior change, and a greater emphasis on it may be warranted in programs. The trust mechanism was likely also influenced by the unique Ethiopian social and political context at the time of the study, which was characterized by a stratified and hierarchical society with strong political control and will54 and high levels of social cohesion.55 The role of hierarchical trust may be particularly strong in Ethiopia compared with Nigeria and other settings, which may have resulted in caregivers not making informed decisions but feeling obligated to comply with the CHWs advice.21

In the Nigerian sites, respondents reported that messages were received less often and from fewer sources. In addition, the advice of CHWs was questioned more, and elders remained as key influencers. These findings could be attributed to a poorer functioning CHW system in Gombe, with lower coverage than in Ethiopia,56,57 and the lower training and the volunteer nature of the CHWs, as well as the broader cultural, political, and health systems contexts. For example, in Ethiopia, the HEWs provided services both in the community and at the health post, which may have enhanced their status and their ability to influence the community compared with the CHWs in Nigeria who only had a community role. In addition, consistent messaging may have been harder to achieve in Nigeria, which was characterized by interventions with disjointed designs, a proliferation of strategies, and multiple health systems, which created unique challenges.58–62 Further, there may have also been less hierarchical trust in authorities.

Limitations

We used multiple study sites, purposive sampling to saturation, reflexivity, triangulation of methods and respondent groups, consensus coding, and within and across case analysis to increase data quality and the transferability of findings.63 However, the findings may not be transferrable to settings with very different contexts, especially those that are more remote and inaccessible. This limitation is particularly the case in Nigeria, where our site selection was restricted by insurgent activities. The inclusion of more women who delivered at home would have allowed us to examine differences in mechanisms by place of delivery. The potential exists that reporting was influenced by social desirability bias, a particular problem in Ethiopia.54 In addition, the respondents identified by CHWs may have had different attitudes and experiences compared with families that were perhaps less favored by the CHWs.

CONCLUSION

Our study did not aim to generalize about the effectiveness of the CHW programs but to uncover the mechanisms through which they may work when they are functioning. CHW programs face issues with inadequate training and support, high workloads, and poor motivation and performance,3 and these issues have been found to influence CHWs’ ability to deliver behavior change interventions.19 The mechanisms we uncovered are unlikely to be triggered unless health systems function adequately and coverage and quality are improved.

Inadequate training and support, high workloads, and poor motivation and performance can influence CHWs’ ability to deliver behavior change interventions.

Funding

The research was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as part of the IDEAS (Informed Decisions for Actions to improve maternal and newborn health) study.

Competing interests

None declared.

Notes

Peer Reviewed

First published online: July 24, 2020

Cite this article as: Hill Z, Scheelbeek P, Hamza Y, Amare Y, Schellenberg J. Are we using the right approach to change newborn care practices in the community? Qualitative evidence from Ethiopia and Northern Nigeria. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020;8(3):383-395. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00410

  • Received: November 26, 2019.
  • Accepted: June 12, 2020.
  • Published: September 30, 2020.
  • © Hill et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00410

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hanson C,
    2. Kujala S,
    3. Waiswa P,
    4. Marchant T,
    5. Schellenberg J
    . Community-based approaches for neonatal survival: meta-analyses of randomized trial data. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(6):453–464C. doi:10.2471/blt.16.175844. pmid:28603312
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Home Visits for the Newborn Child: A Strategy to Improve Survival. WHO and UNICEF; 2009. Accessed July 13, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70002/WHO_FCH_CAH_09.02_eng.pdf
  3. 3.↵
    1. Perry HB,
    2. Zulliger R,
    3. Rogers MM
    . Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: an overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:399–421. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182354. pmid:24387091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Children’s Fund. Caring for Newborns and Children in the Community: A Training Course for Community Health Workers: Caring for the Newborn at Home. WHO; 2015. Accessed July 13, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204273
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kumar V,
    2. Kumar A,
    3. Ghosh AK, et al
    . Enculturating science: community-centric design of behavior change interactions for accelerating health impact. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(5):393–415. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2015.06.010. pmid:26215599
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nair S,
    2. Darak S,
    3. Parsekar S, et al
    . Effectiveness of Behaviour Change Communication (BCC) Interventions in Delivering Health Messages on Antenatal Care for Improving Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Indicators in a Limited Literacy Setting: An Evidence Summary of Systematic Reviews. Protocol. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London; 2016. Accessed July 13, 2020. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/CMS/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/BCC_SE_Protocol.pdf
  7. 7.↵
    1. Elder JP,
    2. Pequegnat W,
    3. Ahmed S, et al
    . Caregiver behavior change for child survival and development in low- and middle-income countries: an examination of the evidence. J Health Commun. 2014;19(Suppl 1):25–66. doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.940477. pmid:25207447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Miike Y
    . An Asiacentric reflection on Eurocentric bias in communication theory. Commun Monogr. 2007;74(2):272–278. doi:10.1080/03637750701390093
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kim M
    . The four cultures of cultural research. Commun Monogr. 2007;74(2):279–285. doi:10.1080/03637750701393063
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Waisbord S
    . Where do we go next? Behavioral and social change for child survival. J Health Commun. 2014;19(Suppl 1):216–222. doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.933288. pmid:25207454
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pinto RM,
    2. da Silva SB,
    3. Soriano R
    . Community health workers in Brazil’s Unified Health System: a framework of their praxis and contributions to patient health behaviors. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(6):940–947. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.025. pmid:22305469
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Loeliger KB,
    2. Niccolai LM,
    3. Mtungwa LN,
    4. Moll A,
    5. Shenoi SV
    . “I have to push him with a wheelbarrow to the clinic”: community health workers’ roles, needs, and strategies to improve HIV care in rural South Africa. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016;30(8):385–394. doi:10.1089/apc.2016.0096. pmid:27509239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Mlotshwa L,
    2. Harris B,
    3. Schneider H,
    4. Moshabela M
    . Exploring the perceptions and experiences of community health workers using role identity theory. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:28045. doi:10.3402/gha.v8.28045. pmid:26387505
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Oliver M,
    2. Geniets A,
    3. Winters N,
    4. Rega I,
    5. Mbae SM
    . What do community health workers have to say about their work, and how can this inform improved programme design? A case study with CHWs within Kenya. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:27168. doi:10.3402/gha.v8.27168. pmid:26004292
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ruano AL,
    2. Hernandez A,
    3. Dahlblom K,
    4. Hurtig AK,
    5. Sebastian MS
    . ‘It’s the sense of responsibility that keeps you going’: stories and experiences of participation from rural community health workers in Guatemala. Arch Public Health. 2012;70(1):18. doi:10.1186/0778-7367-70-18. pmid:22958409
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Musinguzi LK,
    2. Turinawe EB,
    3. Rwemisisi JT, et al
    . Linking communities to formal health care providers through village health teams in rural Uganda: lessons from linking social capital. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15(1):4. doi:10.1186/s12960-016-0177-9. pmid:28077148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sarin E,
    2. Lunsford SS
    . How female community health workers navigate work challenges and why there are still gaps in their performance: a look at female community health workers in maternal and child health in two Indian districts through a reciprocal determinism framework. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15(1):44. doi:10.1186/s12960-017-0222-3. pmid:28666447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Daniels K,
    2. Sanders D,
    3. Daviaud E,
    4. Doherty T
    . Valuing and sustaining (or not) the ability of volunteer community health workers to deliver integrated community case management in northern Ghana: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0126322. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126322. pmid:26079713
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Aseyo RE,
    2. Mumma J,
    3. Scott K, et al
    . Realities and experiences of community health volunteers as agents for behaviour change: evidence from an informal urban settlement in Kisumu, Kenya. Hum Resour Health. 2018;16(1):53. doi:10.1186/s12960-018-0318-4. pmid:30286763
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mohajer N,
    2. Singh D
    . Factors enabling community health workers and volunteers to overcome socio-cultural barriers to behaviour change: meta-synthesis using the concept of social capital. Hum Resour Health. 2018;16(1):63. doi:10.1186/s12960-018-0331-7. pmid:30463573
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Antwi GD,
    2. Bates LA,
    3. King R, et al
    . Facilitators and barriers to uptake of an extended seasonal malaria chemoprevention programme in Ghana: a qualitative study of caregivers and community health workers. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166951. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166951. pmid:27898699
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mishra A
    . ‘Trust and teamwork matter’: community health workers’ experiences in integrated service delivery in India. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(8):960–974. doi:10.1080/17441692.2014.934877. pmid:25025872
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Jaskiewicz W,
    2. Tulenko K
    . Increasing community health worker productivity and effectiveness: a review of the influence of the work environment. Hum Resour Health. 2012;10:38. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-10-38. pmid:23017131
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kok MC,
    2. Ormel H,
    3. Broerse JEW, et al
    . Optimising the benefits of community health workers' unique position between communities and the health sector: a comparative analysis of factors shaping relationships in four countries. Glob Public Health. 2017;12(11):1404–1432. doi:10.1080/17441692.2016.1174722. pmid:27133127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Panday S,
    2. Bissell P,
    3. van Teijlingen E,
    4. Simkhada P
    . The contribution of female community health volunteers (FCHVs) to maternity care in Nepal: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):623. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2567-7. pmid:28870185
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Pitt C,
    2. Diawara H,
    3. Ouedraogo DJ, et al
    . Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in children: a qualitative study of community perceptions and recommendations in Burkina Faso and Mali. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32900. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032900. pmid:22412946
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Marchal B,
    2. Van Belle S,
    3. Van Olmen J,
    4. Hoerée T,
    5. Kegels G
    . Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A literature review of methodological practice in health systems research. Evaluation. 2012;18(2):192–212. doi:10.1177%2F1356389012442444
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Banteyerga H
    . Ethiopia’s health extension program: improving health through community involvement. MEDICC Rev. 2011;13(3):46–49. doi:10.1590/s1555-79602011000300011. pmid:21778960
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Koblinsky M,
    2. Tain F,
    3. Gaym A,
    4. Karim A,
    5. Carnell M,
    6. Tesfaye S
    . Responding to the maternal health care challenge: the Ethiopian Health Extension Program. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2010;24(Special Issue 1):105–109.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Makowiecka K,
    2. Marchant T,
    3. Betemariam W, et al
    . Characterising innovations in maternal and newborn health based on a common theory of change: lessons from developing and applying a characterisation framework in Nigeria, Ethiopia and India. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4(4):e001405. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001405. pmid:31406587
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health. Health Sector Development Programme IV Annual Performance Report, EFY 2007 (2014/15). Federal Ministry of Health; 2015.
  32. 32.
    1. Wang H,
    2. Tesfaye R,
    3. Gandham R,
    4. Tesfaye Chekagn C
    . Ethiopia Health Extension Program: An Institutionalized Community Approach for Universal Health Coverage. World Bank Group; 2016. Accessed July 13, 2020. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/24119/9781464808159.pdf
  33. 33.
    1. Maes K,
    2. Closser S,
    3. Vorel E,
    4. Tesfaye Y
    . A women’s development army: narratives of community health worker investment and empowerment in rural Ethiopia. Stud Comparative International Development. 2015;50(4):455–478. doi:10.1007/s12116-015-9197-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Zerihun A,
    2. Admassu M,
    3. Tulloch O,
    4. Kok M,
    5. Datiko DG
    . Context Analysis: Close-to Community Providers in Ethiopia. Reachout Consortium; 2014. Accessed July 13, 2020. http://www.reachoutconsortium.org/media/1828/ethiopiacontextanalysisjuly2014compressed.pdf
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mason E,
    2. McDougall L,
    3. Lawn JE, et al
    . From evidence to action to deliver a healthy start for the next generation. Lancet. 2014;384(9941):455–467. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60750-9. pmid:24853599
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF. Every Newborn: An Action Plan to End Preventable Deaths. WHO; 2014. Accessed July 13, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/127938/9789241507448_eng.pdf
  37. 37.↵
    1. Lunze K,
    2. Hamer DH
    . Thermal protection of the newborn in resource-limited environments. J Perinatol. 2012;32(5):317–324. doi:10.1038/jp.2012.11. pmid:22382859
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Michie S,
    2. van Stralen MM,
    3. West R
    . The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42. pmid:21513547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Michie S,
    2. Johnston M,
    3. Abraham C,
    4. Lawton R,
    5. Parker D,
    6. Walker A
    . Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.011155. pmid:15692000
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.
    1. Cane J,
    2. O’Connor D,
    3. Michie S
    . Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-37. pmid:22530986
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.
    1. Rice T
    . The behavioral economics of health and health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:431–447. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114353
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Astbury B,
    2. Leeuw F
    . Unpacking black boxes: mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. Am J Eval. 2010;31(3):363–381. doi:10.1177%2F1098214010371972
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Bee M,
    2. Shiroor A,
    3. Hill Z
    . Neonatal care practices in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative data. J Health Popul Nutr. 2018;37(1):9. doi:10.1186/s41043-018-0141-5. pmid:29661239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Colucci E
    . “Focus groups can be fun”: the use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1422–1433. doi:10.1177/1049732307308129. pmid:18000081
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Al-Amer R,
    2. Ramjan L,
    3. Glew P,
    4. Darwish M,
    5. Salamonson Y
    . Language translation challenges with Arabic speakers participating in qualitative research studies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;54:150–157. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.010. pmid:25936733
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Whitlock EP,
    2. Orleans CT,
    3. Pender N,
    4. Allan J
    . Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling interventions: an evidence-based approach. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(4):267–284. doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00415-4. pmid:11988383
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Laverack G
    . The challenge of behaviour change and health promotion. Challenges. 2017;8(2):25. doi:10.3390/challe8020025
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    1. Hornik R
    . Exposure: theory and evidence about all the ways it matters. Soc Market Q. 2002;8(3):31–37. doi:10.1080%2F15245000214135
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    1. Murray J,
    2. Remes P,
    3. Ilboudo R, et al
    . The Saturation+ approach to behavior change: case study of a child survival radio campaign in Burkina Faso. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015;3(4):544–556. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00049. pmid:26681703
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. McPherson R,
    2. Hodgins S
    . Postnatal home visitation: lessons from country programs operating at scale. J Glob Health. 2018;8(1):010422. doi:10.7189/jogh.08.010422. pmid:29977530
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Kok MC,
    2. Broerse JEW,
    3. Theobald S,
    4. Ormel H,
    5. Dieleman M,
    6. Taegtmeyer M
    . Performance of community health workers: situating their intermediary position within complex adaptive health systems. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15(1):59. doi:10.1186/s12960-017-0234-z. pmid:28865471
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.
    1. Kok MC,
    2. Kea AZ,
    3. Datiko DG, et al
    . A qualitative assessment of health extension workers' relationships with the community and health sector in Ethiopia: opportunities for enhancing maternal health performance. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:80. doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0077-4. pmid:26423049
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Scott K,
    2. Beckham SW,
    3. Gross M, et al
    . What do we know about community-based health worker programs? A systematic review of existing reviews on community health workers. Hum Resour Health. 2018;16(1):39. doi:10.1186/s12960-018-0304-x. pmid:30115074
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Østebø MT,
    2. Cogburn MD,
    3. Mandani AS
    . The silencing of political context in health research in Ethiopia: why it should be a concern. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(2):258–270. doi:10.1093/heapol/czx150. pmid:29165682
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. De Silva MJ,
    2. Harpham T
    . Maternal social capital and child nutritional status in four developing countries. Health Place. 2007;13(2):341–355. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.02.005. pmid:16621665
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Marchant T
    . Change in Maternal and Newborn Health Care. Interactions Between Families and Frontline Workers—Their Frequency, Quality, and Equity—and Coverage of Interventions for Mothers and Newborns. Report from Gombe State, Nigeria, 2012–2015. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; 2016. Accessed July 13, 2020. https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/hnn-content/uploads/IDEAS_Marchant_T_LSHTM_Gombe_State_Nigeria_2016_MNCH_Low_Res_0.pdf
  57. 57.↵
    1. Marchant T
    . Change in Maternal and Newborn Health Care: Interaction Between Families and Frontline Workers—Their Frequency, Quality, and Equity—and Coverage of Intervention for Mothers and Newborns. Report from Ethiopia Surveys 2012–2015. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2016. Accessed July 13, 2020. https://ideas.lshtm.ac.uk/report/changes-in-mnh-care-in-ethiopia/
  58. 58.↵
    1. Kana M,
    2. Doctor H,
    3. Peleteiro B,
    4. Lunet N,
    5. Barros H
    . Maternal and child health interventions in Nigeria: a systematic review of published studies from 1990 to 2014. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:334. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1688-3. pmid:25881020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.
    1. Williams A
    . The Evolution of Programs Designed to Increase Utilization of Skilled Birth Attendance in Nigeria. World Bank; 2014.
  60. 60.
    1. Izugbara C,
    2. Wekesah F,
    3. Adedini S
    . Maternal Health in Nigeria. A Situational Update. African Population and Health Research Center; 2016. Accessed July 13, 2020. https://aphrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Maternal-Health-in-Nigeria_Final-Report.pdf
  61. 61.
    1. Abimbola S,
    2. Okoli U,
    3. Olubajo O,
    4. Abdullahi MJ,
    5. Pate MA
    . The midwives service scheme in Nigeria. PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001211. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001211. pmid:22563303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Oleribe OO,
    2. Ezieme IP,
    3. Oladipo O,
    4. Akinola EP,
    5. Udofia D,
    6. Taylor-Robinson SD
    . Industrial action by healthcare workers in Nigeria in 2013-2015: an inquiry into causes, consequences and control—a cross-sectional descriptive study. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14(1):46. doi:10.1186/s12960-016-0142-7. pmid:27465121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Polit DF,
    2. Beck CT
    . Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(11):1451–1458. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004. pmid:20598692
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 8 (3)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 8, No. 3
September 30, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Are We Using the Right Approach to Change Newborn Care Practices in the Community? Qualitative Evidence From Ethiopia and Northern Nigeria
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Are We Using the Right Approach to Change Newborn Care Practices in the Community? Qualitative Evidence From Ethiopia and Northern Nigeria
Zelee Hill, Pauline Scheelbeek, Yashua Hamza, Yared Amare, Joanna Schellenberg
Global Health: Science and Practice Sep 2020, 8 (3) 383-395; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00410

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Are We Using the Right Approach to Change Newborn Care Practices in the Community? Qualitative Evidence From Ethiopia and Northern Nigeria
Zelee Hill, Pauline Scheelbeek, Yashua Hamza, Yared Amare, Joanna Schellenberg
Global Health: Science and Practice Sep 2020, 8 (3) 383-395; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00410
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Funding
    • Competing interests
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What Distinguishes Women Who Choose to Self-Inject? A Prospective Cohort Study of Subcutaneous Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Users in Ghana
  • Implementation of HIV Retesting During Pregnancy and Postpartum in Kenya: A Cross-Sectional Study
  • Lessons Learned From the Use of the Most Significant Change Technique for Adaptive Management of Complex Health Interventions
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Editorial Board
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2022 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire