Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
EDITORIAL
Open Access

What Is Global Health: Science and Practice Doing to Address Power Imbalances in Publishing?

Sonia Abraham, Stephen Hodgins, Abdulmumin Saad and Madeleine Short Fabic
Global Health: Science and Practice September 2020, 8(3):325-326; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00453
Sonia Abraham
aScientific Editor, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sonia.abraham@jhu.edu
Stephen Hodgins
bEditor-in-Chief, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal, and Associate Professor, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdulmumin Saad
cAssociate Editor, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madeleine Short Fabic
cAssociate Editor, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

What is labeled “global health” has largely concerned the practice of public health work elsewhere, generally in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).1 Indeed, global health’s key feature is that its power structures are generally located in high-income countries (HICs) while its implementation is generally located in LMICs. This imbalance is a result of colonial history, funding sources, and social and economic structures that have conferred power—including privilege, prominence, recognition, funding, opportunity, and decision-making authority—to institutions and individuals based in HICs. These deep-rooted structures have helped amplify the voices of those in HICs over the voices of those based in LMICs.2 In such a system, it is accepted that HICs have expertise to provide and LMICs have capacity gaps to fill.3 This imbalance is reflected in global health program planning, implementation, research, and publishing.4,5 We recognize that they are also reflected at GHSP.

Amplified voice for those based in United States and elsewhere in HICs and diminished voice for those based in LMICs is a poor recipe for improving well-being or strengthening institutions around the world.6 Indeed, the notion that HICs have something to “teach” LMICs but nothing to learn is a reflection of skewed perceptions of expertise and power. These asymmetries have grown even more evident during the COVID-19 pandemic.7

Recent efforts to “decolonize global health” signal an increasing commitment by many players to address these issues of imbalance and inequity.8 At GHSP, we recognize that to meaningfully engage in addressing power imbalances, as a first step, we must look at our own attitudes and practices. We are especially interested in identifying how we need to do things differently to reflect a range of voices and perspectives in our journal that better corresponds to where this work is actually being done.9

  1. We completed a critical examination of the demographic composition of our editorial board and associate editorial team. We found that although we have some gender diversity among our editorial team and editorial board,9 institutions and individuals based in LMICs are underrepresented, as are people of color. We are actively working to ensure diversity in gender, race, ethnicity, and geography of our editorial board, associate editorial team, and peer reviewers.

  2. We are committed to ensuring that perspectives from authors based in LMICs are evident in the articles we publish. Any article submitted to GHSP reporting results from research or program experience in specific LMICs should include authors from these countries. In instances where a submission lacks local authorship, under our revised authorship guidelines, the corresponding author is now ex-pected to provide reasons for any such omission in the cover letter accompanying the submission. Additionally, we are working to revise our instructions for authors to better promote ethical authorship practices.10

  3. We are committed to removing publication barriers that can disproportionately impact authors based in LMICs. Recognizing that journal fees can be a major impediment to article submission and publication, especially for researchers in LMICs,11 we continue to make GHSP a no-fee, open-access journal. Furthermore, in instances where English language barriers could hinder publication opportunities, our editorial team has worked with authors to address language barriers and is committed to continuing this practice.

  4. We expect that any individuals or institutions from HICs that are implementing programs or conducting research in LMICs will respectfully and substantively engage stakeholders from those countries in decision making, planning, implementation, and research and are revising our instructions to authors to reflect that expectation.12,13

We recognize that the challenges of power asymmetries and inadequate diversity are complex and multilayered, and our efforts to address them constitute only a modest first step in the needed direction. We commit to holding ourselves to account, and we invite our readers and other stakeholders to hold to us to account as we work to meaningfully follow through on these initial actions. To that end, we invite our readers, especially those in LMICs, to share their perspectives through letters to the editor, commentary, and research.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

Competing interests

None declared.

Notes

Cite this article as: Abraham S, Hodgins S, Saad A, Short Fabic M. What is Global Health: Science and Practice doing to address power imbalances in publishing? Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020;8(3):325-326. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00453

  • Received: September 3, 2020.
  • Accepted: September 3, 2020.
  • Published: September 30, 2020.
  • © Abraham et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00453

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. King NB,
    2. Koski A
    . Defining global health as public health somewhere else. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(1):e002172. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002172. pmid:32095274
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Global Health 50/50. The Global Health 50/50 Report 2020: Power, Privilege and Priorities. Global Health 50/50; 2020. Accessed August 7, 2020. https://globalhealth5050.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Power-Privilege-and-Priorities-2020-Global-Health-5050-Report.pdf
  3. 3.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO). Delivered by Women, Led by Men: A Gender and Equity Analysis of the Global Health and Social Workforce. WHO; 2019. Accessed August 7, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311322/9789241515467-eng.pdf
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hedt-Gauthier BL,
    2. Jeufack HM,
    3. Neufeld NH, et al
    . Stuck in the middle: a systematic review of authorship in collaborative health research in Africa, 2014-2016. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(5):e001853. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001853. pmid:31750000
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Abimbola S
    . The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(5):e002068. doi:10.1136%2Fbmjgh-2019-002068. pmid:31750005
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Pai M
    . Global health needs to be global & diverse. Forbes. March 8, 2020. Accessed August 7, 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/madhukarpai/2020/03/08/global-health-needs-to-be-global–diverse/
  7. 7.↵
    1. Byatnal A
    . Is COVID-19 magnifying colonial attitudes in global health? Devex. June 19, 2020. Accessed August 7, 2020. https://www.devex.com/news/is-covid-19-magnifying-colonial-attitudes-in-global-health-97499
  8. 8.↵
    1. Büyüm AM,
    2. Kenney C,
    3. Koris A, et al
    . Decolonising global health: if not now, when? BMJ Global Health 2020;5:e003394. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003394. pmid:32759186
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Nafade V,
    2. Sen P,
    3. Pai M
    . Global health journals need to address equity, diversity and inclusion. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(5):e002018. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002018. pmid:31750004
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Smith E,
    2. Hunt M,
    3. Master Z
    . Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:42. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-42. pmid:24885855
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Smith E,
    2. Haustein S,
    3. Mongeon P,
    4. Shu F,
    5. Ridde V,
    6. Larivière V
    . Knowledge sharing in global health research - the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):73. doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0235-3. pmid:28851401
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kim H,
    2. Novakovic U,
    3. Muntaner C,
    4. Hawkes MT
    . A critical assessment of the ideological underpinnings of current practice in global health and their historical origins. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1651017. doi:10.1080/16549716.2019.1651017. pmid:31431145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Gautier L,
    2. Sieleunou I,
    3. Kalolo A
    . Deconstructing the notion of “global health research partnerships” across Northern and African contexts. BMC Med Ethics. 2018; 19(Suppl 1):49. doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0280-7. pmid:29945595
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 8 (3)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 8, No. 3
September 30, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What Is Global Health: Science and Practice Doing to Address Power Imbalances in Publishing?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What Is Global Health: Science and Practice Doing to Address Power Imbalances in Publishing?
Sonia Abraham, Stephen Hodgins, Abdulmumin Saad, Madeleine Short Fabic
Global Health: Science and Practice Sep 2020, 8 (3) 325-326; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00453

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
What Is Global Health: Science and Practice Doing to Address Power Imbalances in Publishing?
Sonia Abraham, Stephen Hodgins, Abdulmumin Saad, Madeleine Short Fabic
Global Health: Science and Practice Sep 2020, 8 (3) 325-326; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00453
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclaimer
    • Competing interests
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Understanding resilience, self-reliance and increasing country voice: a clash of ideologies in global health
  • Powerful ideas? Decolonisation and the future of global health
  • What Potential Authors Should Know About Publishing in Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Beyond pledges: academic journals in high-income countries can do more to decolonise global health
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Supply Chain Workforce: The Foundation of Health Supply Chains
  • The Challenge Initiative: Lessons on Rapid Scale-Up of Family Planning and Adolescent and Youth Sexual and Reproductive Health Services
  • Low-Dose Antenatal Calcium Supplementation: An Intervention Ready for Prime Time
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire