Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • Provider Behavior Change for Improved Health Outcomes
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
      • Call for Abstracts
      • The Responsive Feedback Approach
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Evaluating the Implementation of an Intervention to Improve Postpartum Contraception in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study of Provider and Client Perspectives

Kristy Hackett, Sarah Huber-Krum, Joel M. Francis, Leigh Senderowicz, Erin Pearson, Hellen Siril, Nzovu Ulenga and Iqbal Shah
Global Health: Science and Practice June 2020, 8(2):270-289; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00365
Kristy Hackett
aDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: khackett@hsph.harvard.edu
Sarah Huber-Krum
aDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joel M. Francis
bManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
cDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leigh Senderowicz
aDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin Pearson
dTechnical Innovation and Evidence, Ipas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hellen Siril
bManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nzovu Ulenga
bManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iqbal Shah
aDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Provider- and Client-Level Interventions for the PPIUD Initiative

    Abbreviations: AGOTA, Association of Gynecologists and Obstetricians of Tanzania; FP, family planning; IUD, intrauterine device; ob/gyn, obstetrics/gynecology; PPFP, postpartum family planning; PPIUD, postpartum intrauterine device.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Visual Representation of the Implementation Outcomes Framework27

    aInstitute of Medicine standards of care.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Ecological Framework Illustrating Factors That Influenced Implementation of the PPIUD Initiative in Tanzania

    Abbreviations: PPFP, postpartum family planning; PPIUD, postpartum intrauterine device.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Key Elements and Inputs Intended for Implementation of the PPIUD Initiative in 6 Countries

    Elements and InputsDescription
    Training: “Train-the-trainer” model: Training cascaded from master trainers to existing eligible providers at selected health facilities

    Counseling:

    • Prenatal counseling on available family planning methods with an emphasis on PPFP using standard training methods (e.g., GATHER model)

    • Included information on the advantages of PPIUD

    • Open discussion about providers’ views of PPIUD to address any prejudices

    • Role play, case scenarios

    • Providers encouraged to use counseling aids (e.g., leaflets, posters, flipcharts, and videos)

    PPIUD insertion and removal:

    • Theoretical (classroom-based) training and practical sessions using Mama-U postpartum uterus models

    • Refresher trainings offered as needed

    • Regular training of new staff rotating in

    Equipment and supplies
    • Mama-U models

    • Copper T IUDs

    • Long-handled 33 cm curved Kelly forceps

    National coordination
    • Implementation was coordinated through national professional societies or colleges to encourage local ownership

    • National societies set up steering groups for clinical and technical guidance

    Structures established to facilitate implementation
    • Dedicated project management team

    • Facility-level project coordinators

    • Data Safety Monitoring Committees

    PPIUD counseling and insertion services delivered by trained providers
    • Integrated within existing maternity services

    • Prenatal counseling on all available contraception methods with an emphasis on PPFP, and the advantages of PPIUD as a safe, effective, and reversible long-acting method

    • Consent forms provided during prenatal visits

    • Stickers placed on women’s case files to identify consenting women at delivery

    • Women who did not receive prenatal counseling could be counseled during early labor or the postnatal period to ensure insertion within 48 hours if PPIUD was desired

    Monitoring and evaluation
    • Data collection officers collected information on counseling, consent, PPIUD, and follow-up for women delivering in participating facilities

    • Abbreviations: GATHER, greet, ask, tell, help, explain, and return; IUD, intrauterine device; PPFP, postpartum family planning; PPIUD, postpartum intrauterine device.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    PPIUD Initiative Achievements in Tanzania

    Achievements
    Participating hospitals, n6
    Providers trained under the PPIUD Initiative, n827
    Women counseled on family planning and PPIUD, n21,479
        Counseled during antenatal care, %57.0
        Counseled only after admission for delivery, %43.0
    Deliveries during the PPIUD Initiative period, n91,387
    Women followed up for postpartum interview, n80,194
    Women who consented for PPIUD insertion, n5,634
    PPIUD insertions, n3,095
    • Abbreviation: PPIUD, postpartum intrauterine device.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Number and Percent Distribution of Women, by Background Characteristics and Interview Type

    Interviews With Pregnant WomenInterviews With Women Receiving PPIUD
    n (%)n (%)
    Geographical region
        Mbeya3 (15)9 (33)
        Arusha6 (30)5 (19)
        Dodoma2 (10)4 (15)
        Dar es Salaam5 (25)6 (22)
        Pwani4 (20)3 (11)
    Age, years
        <201 (5)1 (4)
        20–243 (15)3 (11)
        25–2910 (50)13 (48)
        30–343 (15)2 (7)
        35–422 (10)7 (26)
        Missing1 (5)1 (4)
    Education
        Some Primary1 (5)0 (0)
        Completed Primary3 (15)6 (22)
        Some Secondary3 (15)1 (4)
        Completed Secondary10 (50)15 (56)
        More than Secondary2 (10)4 (15)
        Missing1 (5)1 (4)
    Marital Status
        Married15 (75)21 (78)
        Single, not living together2 (10)3 (11)
        Single, living together1 (5)0 (0)
        Widowed0 (0)2 (7)
        Missing2 (10)1 (4)
    Occupation
        Unemployed5 (25)6 (22)
        Homemaker1 (5)0 (0)
        Business owner5 (25)9 (33)
        Teacher2 (10)4 (15)
        Other (e.g., nurse, secretary, salonist)5 (25)7 (26)
        Missing2 (10)1 (4)
    Religion
        Christian15 (75)20 (74)
        Muslim3 (15)6 (22)
        Missing2 (10)1 (4)
    Total No. of Children (alive or deceased)
        06 (30)0 (0)
        18 (40)11 (41)
        22 (10)7 (26)
        3 or more3 (15)8 (30)
        Missing1 (5)1 (4)
    • Abbreviation: PPIUD, postpartum intrauterine device.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Number and Percent Distribution of Providers by Background Characteristics

    Characteristicn (%)
    Geographical Region
        Mbeya4 (27)
        Arusha4 (27)
        Dodoma2 (13)
        Dar es Salaam2 (13)
        Pwani3 (20)
    Gender
        Male2 (13)
        Female13 (87)
    Age
        29–397 (47)
        40–504 (27)
        >502 (13)
        Missing2 (13)
    Profession
        Physician3 (20)
        Nurse12 (80)
    Length working in profession, years
        ≥55 (33)
        6–154 (27)
        ≥163 (20)
        Missing3 (20)
    Length providing family planning services, years
        ≥55 (33)
        6–107 (47)
        ≥111 (7)
        Missing2 (13)
    • View popup
    TABLE 5.

    Application of the Implementation Outcomes Framework to Assess Facilitators and Barriers to PPIUD Initiative Implementation in Tanzania

    Outcome and DefinitionFacilitatorBarrier
    Implementation Outcomes
    Acceptability: Perception among stakeholders that intervention is acceptable (e.g., satisfaction with PPIUD training content, complexity, comfort)
    • High satisfaction with PPIUD training

    • Lack of providers trained on PPIUD insertion

    • Lack of support from local health authorities

    Adoption: Initial implementation of PPFP counseling and PPIUD insertion; Intention to try
    • Increased confidence following PPIUD training

    • Time constraints and inadequate staffing

    • Gaps in referral system between satellite clinics and hospitals

    Fidelity: Delivered counseling as intended (e.g., reach, content, and target population)
    • Individual counseling replaced by group counseling

    • Diminished provider motivation

    • Counseling rushed or skipped

    • Skewed or incomplete counseling

    Penetration: Diffusion of PPIUD Initiative within intervention facilities and to other non-intervention sites
    • Emphasis on PPIUD’s mechanism of pregnancy prevention during training

    • Objections from faith-based facilities

    • Expectation for remuneration among staff who did not receive initial training

    Sustainability: Long-term maintenance and institutionalization of the PPIUD Initiative
    • Support for population policies and family planning programs to achieve fertility reduction goals

    • Breakdown of supply chain and stock-outs

    Service Outcomes
    Equity: Extent to which the PPIUD implementation is equally available/accessible to all intended beneficiaries
    • Differential treatment by health care providers

    • Financial barriers to accessing hospitals

    • Lack of community-based PPFP counseling and services

    Client Outcomes

    Client receptiveness/demand for services:

    Client receptiveness to being counseled on PPFP and/or demand for receiving the PPIUD

    • Level of support from husband/partner

    • Shared intention among couples to space pregnancy for financial reasons

    • Community and gender norms related to birth spacing

    • Community diffusion of preference for PPIUD and peer recommendation

    • Women's trust in provider advice

    • Cost-free counseling and insertion services

    • Fear of insertion, concerns related to sexual experiences postinsertion, unexpected expulsion and experience of unanticipated side effects (results published elsewhere26).

    Satisfaction with PPIUD services:

    Client receptiveness to being counseled on PPFP and/or receiving PPIUD; Satisfaction with counseling and services

    • Delivery of counseling and services by female provider

    • Interpersonal aspects of care

    • Perceived provider incompetence

    • Abbreviations: PPIUD, postpartum intrauterine device; PPFP, postpartum family planning.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Supplement 1 -

      Supplement 1

    • Supplement 2 -

      Supplement 2

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 8 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 8, No. 2
June 30, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluating the Implementation of an Intervention to Improve Postpartum Contraception in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study of Provider and Client Perspectives
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluating the Implementation of an Intervention to Improve Postpartum Contraception in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study of Provider and Client Perspectives
Kristy Hackett, Sarah Huber-Krum, Joel M. Francis, Leigh Senderowicz, Erin Pearson, Hellen Siril, Nzovu Ulenga, Iqbal Shah
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2020, 8 (2) 270-289; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00365

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluating the Implementation of an Intervention to Improve Postpartum Contraception in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study of Provider and Client Perspectives
Kristy Hackett, Sarah Huber-Krum, Joel M. Francis, Leigh Senderowicz, Erin Pearson, Hellen Siril, Nzovu Ulenga, Iqbal Shah
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2020, 8 (2) 270-289; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00365
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • PPIUD INITIATIVE DESCRIPTION AND ACHIEVEMENTS
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Provider perspectives in implementing the Postpartum Intrauterine Device Initiative in Sri Lanka: a qualitative study
  • 'I havent heard much about other methods: quality of care and person-centredness in a programme to promote the postpartum intrauterine device in Tanzania
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Leveraging Responsive Feedback to Redesign a Demand Generation Strategy: Experience From the IntegratE Project in Lagos State, Nigeria
  • Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medical Product Procurement, Prices, and Supply Chain in Zimbabwe: Lessons for Supply Chain Resiliency
  • Assessing Use, Usefulness, and Application of the High Impact Practices in Family Planning Briefs and Strategic Planning Guides
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health
  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Service Integration
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire