Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • Provider Behavior Change for Improved Health Outcomes
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
      • Call for Abstracts
      • The Responsive Feedback Approach
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Scaling Up Access to Implants: A Summative Evaluation of the Implants Access Program

Rebecca Braun and Annika Grever
Global Health: Science and Practice June 2020, 8(2):205-219; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00383
Rebecca Braun
aGlobal Impact Advisors, San Mateo, CA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annika Grever
aGlobal Impact Advisors, San Mateo, CA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: annika.grever@globalimpactadvisors.org
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Implant Procurement for FP2020 Countries, 2010–2018a

    a These data were sourced from United Nations Population Fund Reproductive Health Interchange on July 1, 2019. Data are provided by the central procurement offices of large family planning donors, institutional buyers, and other organizations that procure contraceptives. The data reflect ∼80% of donor-provided contraceptive supplies and do not include directly procured products by governments. More information is available at: https://www.unfpaprocurement.org/rhi-home.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Implants Access Program Governance Structure

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Key Insights from the Implants Access Program Evaluation

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Implants Access Program Objectives, Barriers Addressed, and Partner Approaches

    ObjectivesBarriers AddressedPartner Approaches
    1. Improve market dynamics
    • High unit price of the primary LARC demanded in FP2020 countries

    • Volume guarantee to lower price of implants

    • Support for market entry of a generic implant product

    2. Strengthen supply chain performance
    • Limited and inconsistent information on country procurement needs and supply availability

    • Inconsistent supply availability at service delivery points

    • Improvements to data visibility, transparency, and coordination to better match country-level supply and demand

    • Introduction of dashboards and job aids to strengthen and support in-country supply chain efforts

    3. Improve and expand service delivery
    • Shortage of trained providers to insert and remove implants

    • Creation and expansion of innovative and cost-effective training approaches

    • Expansion of the range of service delivery models to provide LARCs

    4. Increase knowledge and awareness
    • Limited knowledge among women about family planning options including implants

    • Community awareness and sensitization activities to increase understanding of family planning and benefits of LARCs

    5. Together, the strategies above contributed to a fifth objective: Improve the enabling environment for contraceptives
    • Abbreviation: LARC, long-acting reversible contraceptive.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Key Events in the Global Family Planning Field, 2012–2018

    EventYearObjectiveRelevance to Implants Access Program
    London Family Planning Summit2012This summit secured US$2.3 billion toward meeting the unmet need for contraception for 120 million women worldwide by 2020.Countries made specific goals around raising modern contraceptive prevalence rate and reducing unmet need; donors committed funding for family planning commodities and service delivery, including implants.
    FP2020 launch2012This global partnership of governments, donors, civil society organizations, and technical experts emerged to help meet the goals of the 2012 London summit.FP2020 connected countries committed to LARCs with financial and technical resources as needed.
    UN Commodities Commission report2012This report listed 13 lifesaving commodities that could save over 6 million lives and avert maternal deaths via improved access to family planning.Implants were named as a lifesaving commodity and this report identified recommendations to improve financing, utilization, supply, and demand for implants.
    UNICEF RMNCH Trust Fund2013This fund was established by UNICEF, UNFPA, and WHO to finance high-impact interventions in RMNCH based on recommendations of the UN Commodities Commission report.The RMNCH trust fund supported eight countries as they expanded the availability of implants and other lifesaving commodities.
    WHO task shifting recommendations2013The WHO published updated, evidence-based recommendations on the provision of RMNCH interventions by different cadres of health workers.The updated task shifting recommendations specified that auxiliary nurses and auxiliary nurse midwives should be permitted to insert and remove implants with targeted monitoring and evaluation.
    WHO expansion of implants eligibility criteria2015The fifth edition of WHO’s Medical Eligibility Criteria reduced restrictions around the use of implants and other hormonal contraceptives for adolescents and breastfeeding women less than 6 weeks’ postpartum.Postpartum women had more options for hormonal contraceptives, which enabled the opportunity to provide LARCs to women shortly after birth. Adolescents were cleared to access implants.
    Youth statement on LARCs2015This statement provided evidence that LARCs were safe for youth and adolescents and was signed by over 50 endorsing organizations.The document provided guidance for programs and service providers that all adolescents and youth deserved access to a full range of methods, including implants.
    2017 Family Planning Summit2017Donors, policymakers, and advocates convened to assess efforts toward reaching FP2020 goals and accelerate progress.Countries, donors, civil society organizations, and private sector partners recommitted to LARCs. More than 2 dozen FP2020 countries committed to expanding their method mix.
    • Abbreviations: LARC, long-acting reversible contraceptive; RMNCH, reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health; UN, United Nations; UNICEF, United Nations Children’s Fund; UNFPA, United Nations Population Fund; WHO, World Health Organization.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 8 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 8, No. 2
June 30, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Scaling Up Access to Implants: A Summative Evaluation of the Implants Access Program
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Scaling Up Access to Implants: A Summative Evaluation of the Implants Access Program
Rebecca Braun, Annika Grever
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2020, 8 (2) 205-219; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00383

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Scaling Up Access to Implants: A Summative Evaluation of the Implants Access Program
Rebecca Braun, Annika Grever
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2020, 8 (2) 205-219; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00383
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • BACKGROUND
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Leveraging Responsive Feedback to Redesign a Demand Generation Strategy: Experience From the IntegratE Project in Lagos State, Nigeria
  • Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medical Product Procurement, Prices, and Supply Chain in Zimbabwe: Lessons for Supply Chain Resiliency
  • Assessing Use, Usefulness, and Application of the High Impact Practices in Family Planning Briefs and Strategic Planning Guides
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire