Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
VIEWPOINT
Open Access

Contraception in the Era of COVID-19

Kavita Nanda, Elena Lebetkin, Markus J. Steiner, Irina Yacobson and Laneta J. Dorflinger
Global Health: Science and Practice June 2020, 8(2):166-168; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00119
Kavita Nanda
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: knanda@fhi360.org
Elena Lebetkin
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus J. Steiner
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irina Yacobson
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laneta J. Dorflinger
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Key Messages

  • In the face of facility service disruptions due to COVID-19, health care providers, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, should strive to maintain continuity of reproductive health care to women and girls as an essential service.

  • When in-person encounters are limited, health care providers should adapt the way contraceptive services are provided by using telehealth whenever possible for counseling, shared decision making, and side effect management, and should make adjustments to provision of contraceptive methods to ensure access.

Globally, approximately 50% of pregnancies are unintended.1 In low- and middle-income countries, where access to health care may be limited, unintended pregnancies can have dire consequences ranging from unsafe abortion to serious pregnancy complications that contribute to maternal and infant mortality.2 As such, contraception is lifesaving and an essential component of reproductive health care. The ability to access and continue using contraception improves women’s reproductive autonomy, reduces unintended pregnancies, and profoundly impacts both women’s and family’s lives, health, empowerment, and well-being, particularly in times of stress and hardship.

As medical systems, clinics, and communities prepare to meet an unprecedented threat causing increased demands for the care of people with COVID-19, strategies to mitigate virus spread and optimize health care resources are evolving and will need to be country specific. Health care providers should strive to ensure continuity of reproductive health care to women and girls in the face of facility service interruption. Even while annual exams and nonurgent appointments are canceled, maintaining access to reproductive health services, including provision of contraception, is key to a comprehensive COVID-19 mitigation strategy and to sustaining the successes of high-quality family planning services that contribute to lowering maternal mortality and improving newborn and child health.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes that countries are at different stages of the COVID-19 epidemic/transmission scenario: (1) no reported cases, (2) sporadic cases, (3) clusters of cases, or (4) community transmission. However, public health measures that WHO recommends for all 4 scenarios include social distancing.3 To ensure continuation of contraceptive access and services, including counseling and shared decision making, a number of adaptations to existing systems are required. In particular, maximizing the use of a “no-touch” approach to care whenever possible is essential.

USE TELEHEALTH FOR COUNSELING AND SCREENING

Use various communication methods that do not require in-person contact (SMS, WhatsApp, video calls, or telephone calls) to:

  • Counsel new clients requesting contraception and to screen for medical eligibility.4–6

  • Issue new prescriptions and refills for clients who desire user-controlled contraceptives (e.g., combined oral contraceptives, progestin-only pills, contraceptive patches, or vaginal contraceptive rings) if no contraindications are evident. Send all prescriptions directly to the pharmacy or clinic to limit contacts.

  • Inform clients who desire long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) of service locations where LARCs are being provided.

  • Manage and treat contraceptive side effects, if possible.

PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COUNSELING AND INFORMATION

  • Counsel on fertility awareness methods7 and correct and consistent condom use in case disruptions occur in the supply of other contraceptive commodities.

  • Counsel current LARC users on the effectiveness of extended use beyond the labeled duration, postponing routine removals.8

  • Educate clients on emergency contraception including both over-the-counter and prescription options.

OPTIMIZE HOW CLIENTS ACCESS CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS

  • Prescribe/dispense multimonth refills to minimize trips to the pharmacy or clinic. Health insurance plans (where existing) should waive time limitations on refills to allow for multimonth dispensing and should consider eliminating or decreasing prescription costs.

  • Train for and offer self-injection of Sayana Press (DMPA-SC), where available, for women desiring injectable contraception.9

  • Continue to offer insertion of LARC methods, such as intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants, to new users where possible with adequate safety preparations for the procedure. Make arrangements to avoid having too many clients in the waiting area. This may involve scheduling clients individually, having clients wait outside, and/or ensuring clients maintain adequate social distancing precautions while inside. If LARC insertion is unavailable, offer the client user-controlled methods.

  • Limit direct contact with current LARC users to situations where removal cannot be delayed or when side effects require a physical/pelvic exam or other tests.

  • Consider placing clients who desire permanent contraception on waitlists and offering them bridge contraception as operating rooms ramp down all but the most urgent surgery.

  • Provide advance prescriptions for emergency contraception to increase awareness and reduce barriers to immediate access.

MAKE CONSIDERATIONS FOR POSTPARTUM WOMEN

Where possible, initiate or continue counseling and access to immediate postpartum contraception before hospital discharge, particularly as access to postpartum visits becomes limited.

  • Provide LARC immediately postpartum for clients who desire LARC and are eligible.6,10

  • Perform permanent contraception procedures for clients who desire it at the time of cesarean delivery and/or after vaginal delivery, if available.

  • Counsel on correct use of the lactational amenorrhea method.

  • Administer DMPA, if the client desires.

  • Prescribe or dispense user-controlled contraceptive methods, including Sayana Press where available, in sufficient quantities to be initiated or continued at home by women who are not breastfeeding or, if breastfeeding, initiated as soon as one of the lactational amenorrhea method criteria expires. Provide method-specific instructions to delay until the client is medically eligible per WHO criteria.

As the world grapples with the novel COVID-19 pandemic, we in the public health community must continue to provide guidance and support to ensure that all women, men, and adolescents can access safe and affordable contraception and contraceptive services. Adjustments to the way services are provided are inevitable; however, quality of and access to services must be maintained. We believe the above guidance provides a foundation for continuing safe contraceptive service provision that countries may adapt to the local context, taking into consideration local policies and stage of the epidemic in each country.

This statement has been adapted from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) COVID-19 FAQs for Obstetrician-Gynecologists, Gynecology, available at https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/covid19-faqs-for-ob-gyns-gynecology.

Notes

Peer Reviewed

First published online: April 20, 2020

Competing Interests: None declared.

Funding: This work is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) provided to FHI 360 through Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-A-15-00045. The content and views expressed by the authors in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government, or FHI 360.

Cite this article as: Nanda K, Lebetkin E, Steiner MJ, Yacobson I, Dorflinger LJ. Contraception in the era of COVID-19. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020;8(2):166-168. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00119

  • Received: March 27, 2019.
  • Accepted: April 3, 2020.
  • Published: June 30, 2020.
  • © Nanda et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00119

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bearak J,
    2. Popinchalk A,
    3. Alkema L,
    4. Sedgh G
    . Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(4):e380–389. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30029-9. pmid:29519649
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    World Bank. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division (Vol. 2) (English). Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2019. Accessed April 1, 2020. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/793971568908763231/Trends-in-maternal-mortality-2000-to-2017-Estimates-by-WHO-UNICEF-UNFPA-World-Bank-Group-and-the-United-Nations-Population-Division
  3. 3.↵
    World Health Organization. Critical preparedness, readiness and response actions for COVID-19. Interim guidance. https://www.who.int/publications-detail/critical-preparedness-readiness-and-response-actions-for-covid-19. Published March 22, 2020. Accessed April 1, 2020.
  4. 4.↵
    ACOG. Implementing Telehealth in Practice Committee Opinion Number 798. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2020/02/implementing-telehealth-in-practice. Published February 2020. Accessed March 26, 2020.
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth. https://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_telemedicine_2010.pdf. Published 2009. Accessed March 26, 2020.
  6. 6.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO). Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2015. Accessed March 26, 2020. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/MEC-5/en/
  7. 7.↵
    1. Peragallo Urrutia R,
    2. Polis CB,
    3. Jensen ET,
    4. Greene ME,
    5. Kennedy E,
    6. Stanford JB
    . Effectiveness of fertility awareness-based methods for pregnancy prevention: a systematic review. 2018;132(3):591–604. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002784. pmid:30095777
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ali M,
    2. Bahamondes L,
    3. Bent Landoulsi S
    . Extended effectiveness of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant and the 20 µg Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for 2 years beyond U.S. Food and Drug Administration product labeling. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(4):534–539. doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-17-00296. pmid:29263025
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kennedy CE,
    2. Yeh PT,
    3. Gaffield ML,
    4. Brady M,
    5. Narasimhan M
    . Self-administration of injectable contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(2):e001350. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001350. pmid:31179026
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Committee Opinion Number 670. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:e32–37. Accessed March 26, 2020. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2016/08/immediate-postpartum-long-acting-reversible-contraception
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 8 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 8, No. 2
June 30, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contraception in the Era of COVID-19
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Contraception in the Era of COVID-19
Kavita Nanda, Elena Lebetkin, Markus J. Steiner, Irina Yacobson, Laneta J. Dorflinger
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2020, 8 (2) 166-168; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00119

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Contraception in the Era of COVID-19
Kavita Nanda, Elena Lebetkin, Markus J. Steiner, Irina Yacobson, Laneta J. Dorflinger
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2020, 8 (2) 166-168; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00119
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • USE TELEHEALTH FOR COUNSELING AND SCREENING
    • PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COUNSELING AND INFORMATION
    • OPTIMIZE HOW CLIENTS ACCESS CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS
    • MAKE CONSIDERATIONS FOR POSTPARTUM WOMEN
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Access to and use of contraceptive care during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the UK: a web-based survey
  • Womens Experiences With Family Planning Under COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional, Interactive Voice Response Survey in Malawi, Nepal, Niger, and Uganda
  • Self-injected contraceptives: does the investment reflect womens preferences?
  • Contraceptive dynamics during COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa: longitudinal evidence from Burkina Faso and Kenya
  • Response strategies for promoting gender equality in public health emergencies: a rapid scoping review
  • Use of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention Among Ghanaian Women: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey
  • Opportunities and Challenges of Delivering Postabortion Care and Postpartum Family Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Doing Things Differently: What It Would Take to Ensure Continued Access to Contraception During COVID-19
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Recommendations for Using Health Service Coverage Cascades to Measure Effective Coverage for Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health Services or Interventions
  • Self-Reflection as a Starting Point: Observations in Global Health Research
  • Advocating for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Central Asia
Show more VIEWPOINT

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health
    • Infectious Diseases
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire