Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
EDITORIAL
Open Access

A Tablet-Based Tool for Care During Labor+Attention to System Requirements

Stephen Hodgins
Global Health: Science and Practice December 2019, 7(4):498-499; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00384
Stephen Hodgins
aEditor-in-Chief, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal, and Associate Professor, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shodgins@ghspjournal.org
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Evidence on using a tablet-based labor decision-support tool suggests the potential for improved practices in labor management. Further rigorous study on these tools is needed to assess the improvements in labor care and outcomes as well as the system requirements needed to achieve such improvements.

See related article by Sanghvi et al.

Over the past decade, it has been heartening to see marked increases in institutional births in many countries. However, this increase has not consistently been associated with corresponding declines in maternal and perinatal deaths.1–3 In many countries, intrapartum stillbirths and very early newborn deaths remain distressingly common. Safe, supportive, vigilant, and well-coordinated care during labor could significantly reduce the burden of such deaths.

USING THE PAPER PARTOGRAM TO AID LABOR DECISION MAKING

The partogram is a single-page, graphic record used to document key clinical information on the mother and fetus during labor and is intended to be an aid to clinical decision making. Although the World Health Organization no longer recommends using the 4-hour action line (based on 1 cm/hour increase in dilatation through the active phase of labor), it does endorse using the partogram for monitoring the well-being of the mother and newborn and for identifying risks of adverse outcomes.4 In principle, as designed, partogram use might be expected to contribute to improved outcomes, mediated through the following:

  • Improvement of practices that can affect placental perfusion

  • More timely identification of complications or risk states and initiation of appropriate action, including transfer or referral

  • Better documentation and sharing of information between involved health workers on care given and status of the mother and newborn, at handover or referral

However, the available evidence for such an effect has been disappointing. A Cochrane review by Lavender et al. (2018)5 found no clear evidence for an association between partogram use and improved practices or outcomes, although they offered more nuanced conclusions in a realist review on the same question.6 From this review, they concluded that to achieve improved outcomes:

  • The partogram and all associated equipment (e.g., manometers for taking blood pressure) need to be reliably available

  • Staffing needs to be adequate for patient load

  • Clinical management needs to provide ongoing, committed support for partogram use and associated labor care practices, including regular audit and feedback

In short, even clinically sound, well-designed job aids cannot be expected on their own to improve practices and outcomes. Indeed, deficiencies in the use of the original paper-based partogram are well known. In many instances, they are filled in after the fact, information recorded may be inaccurate, and they are often not used for decision making. Even if they are used for decision making, there has tended to be excessive emphasis on rate of cervical dilatation.6,7

Even clinically sound, well-designed job aids cannot be expected on their own to improve practices and outcomes.

USING THE TABLET-BASED PARTOGRAPH

The article by Sanghvi et al.8 in this issue of GHSP reports on a study conducted in Kenya that attempted to address some of these known constraints on the effectiveness of partogram use. This study examined the use of a tablet-based documentation/decision-support tool with the following key features:

  • Clinical information can only be entered in real-time, not after the fact.

  • Information entered into the tablet can be monitored by a supervisor, either on- or off-site.

  • Automated prompts are given, encouraging supportive practices (e.g., continued ambulation, presence of a labor companion, taking fluids and food).

  • Audible alarms/triggers remind the health worker on timing for reassessment and indicate if, based on the algorithms in the app, criteria are met suggesting a risk or complication requiring action. (As the authors note, when guidelines for care in labor are further revised, the algorithms used in this tool can be easily reprogrammed.)

Participants in both intervention and comparison arms were given a 2-day training on care during labor, including partogram use. Those in the intervention arm were given an additional 1-day training on the tablet-based tool, which, in the intervention arm, was subsequently used in place of the paper partogram.

The intervention was well received by participating health workers, and the study provides suggestive evidence for improved practices. However, as the authors acknowledge, there are issues with the design and implementation of the study that preclude definitive claims for impact on health outcomes. First, the study sites in the intervention and comparison arms were not well matched: the intervention arm had 2 tertiary-level hospitals with large patient volumes plus 4 health centers offering basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC), and the comparison arm had 4 relatively lower-volume comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care hospitals and 2 health centers offering BEmONC. Second, compared with sites in the intervention arm, a significantly lower proportion of health workers in the comparison arm received the 2-day training. Furthermore, data on performance in the comparison arm were more limited because data were drawn only from the completed partograms.

The intervention was well received, and the study provides suggestive evidence for improved practices.

The evidence from this and similar studies is not yet sufficient to recommend large-scale adoption.9–11 Nevertheless, a strong case can be made for further rigorous study to better characterize what improvements can be achieved in care during labor using such tools and what system requirements must be met to achieve such improvements (such as those identified by Bedwell et al.6).

Notes

Cite this article as: Hodgins S. A tablet-based tool for care during labor+attention to system requirements. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019;7(4):498-499. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00384

  • Published: 2019 Dec 23.
  • © Hodgins.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00384

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fink G,
    2. Ross R,
    3. Hill K
    . Institutional deliveries weakly associated with improved neonatal survival in developing countries: evidence from 192 Demographic and Health Surveys. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(6):1879–1888. doi:10.1093/ije/dyv115. pmid:26130739
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Kunkel M,
    2. Marete I,
    3. Cheng ER, et al
    . Place of delivery and perinatal mortality in Kenya. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43(5):252–259. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.014. pmid:31104765
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Gabrysch S,
    2. Nesbitt RC,
    3. Schoeps A, et al
    . Does facility birth reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in Brong Ahafo, Ghana? A secondary analysis using data on 119 244 pregnancies from two cluster-randomised controlled trials. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(8):e1074–e1087. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30165-2. pmid:31303295
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Recommendations: Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2018.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lavender T,
    2. Cuthbert A,
    3. Smyth RMD
    . Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8:CD005461. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005461.pub5. pmid:30080256
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bedwell C,
    2. Levin K,
    3. Pett C,
    4. Lavender DT
    . A realist review of the partograph: when and how does it work for labour monitoring? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):31. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1213-4. pmid:28086823
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ollerhead E,
    2. Osrin D
    . Barriers to and incentives for achieving partograph use in obstetric practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:281. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-281. pmid:25132124
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sanghvi H,
    2. Mohan D,
    3. Litwin L
    , et al. Effectiveness of an electronic partogram: a mixed-method, quasi-experimental study among skilled birth attendants in Kenya. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019;7 (4):521–539. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00195
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Litwin LE,
    2. Maly C,
    3. Khamis AR, et al
    . Use of an electronic Partograph: feasibility and acceptability study in Zanzibar, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):147. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1760-y. pmid:29743032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Tadesse Y,
    2. Gelagay AA,
    3. Tilahun B,
    4. Endehabtu BF,
    5. Mekonnen ZA,
    6. Gashu KD
    . Willingness to Use Mobile based e-Partograph and Associated Factors among Care Providers in North Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. Online J Public Health Inform. 2019;11(2):e10. doi:10.5210/ojphi.v11i2.9468. pmid:31632604
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rahman A,
    2. Begum T,
    3. Ashraf F, et al
    . Feasibility and effectiveness of electronic vs. paper partograph on improving birth outcomes: A prospective crossover study design. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0222314. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222314. pmid:31589625
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 7 (4)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 7, No. 4
December 23, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Tablet-Based Tool for Care During Labor+Attention to System Requirements
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Tablet-Based Tool for Care During Labor+Attention to System Requirements
Stephen Hodgins
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2019, 7 (4) 498-499; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00384

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Tablet-Based Tool for Care During Labor+Attention to System Requirements
Stephen Hodgins
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2019, 7 (4) 498-499; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00384
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • USING THE PAPER PARTOGRAM TO AID LABOR DECISION MAKING
    • USING THE TABLET-BASED PARTOGRAPH
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Supply Chain Workforce: The Foundation of Health Supply Chains
  • The Challenge Initiative: Lessons on Rapid Scale-Up of Family Planning and Adolescent and Youth Sexual and Reproductive Health Services
  • Low-Dose Antenatal Calcium Supplementation: An Intervention Ready for Prime Time
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire