Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW & ANALYSES
Open Access

Provider Bias in Family Planning Services: A Review of Its Meaning and Manifestations

Julie Solo and Mario Festin
Global Health: Science and Practice September 2019, 7(3):371-385; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00130
Julie Solo
aIndependent Consultant, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: juliesolo08{at}gmail.com
Mario Festin
bDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 7 no. 3 371-385
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00130
PubMed 
31515240

Published By 
Global Health: Science and Practice
Online ISSN 
2169-575X
History 
  • Received: April 17, 2019
  • Accepted: July 2, 2019
  • Published online September 26, 2019.

Article Versions

  • Previous version (September 12, 2019 - 13:52).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© Solo and Festin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00130

Author Information

  1. Julie Soloa⇑,
  2. Mario Festinb
  1. aIndependent Consultant, Durham, NC, USA.
  2. bDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  1. Correspondence to Julie Solo (juliesolo08{at}gmail.com).
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Article usage

Article usage: October 2019 to February 2026

AbstractFullPdf
Oct 2019197479128
Nov 201910740788
Dec 20197232966
Jan 20207472116
Feb 20201745772
Mar 20201238560
May 20201527671
Jun 20201126544
Jul 2020224745
Aug 2020318059
Sep 2020821083
Oct 2020523582
Nov 2020216748
Dec 2020418243
Jan 2021117160
Feb 2021015942
Mar 2021117852
Apr 2021218562
May 2021316466
Jun 2021116854
Jul 2021118753
Aug 2021115757
Sep 2021116753
Oct 2021026495
Nov 2021017580
Dec 2021121144
Jan 2022326482
Feb 2022022353
Mar 2022325079
Apr 2022020953
May 2022230669
Jun 2022317156
Jul 2022116239
Aug 2022111832
Sep 2022118652
Oct 2022019585
Nov 2022221541
Dec 2022013136
Jan 2023729696
Feb 2023011632
Mar 2023120253
Apr 2023114244
May 2023116364
Jun 2023120551
Jul 2023019958
Aug 2023112140
Sep 2023016640
Oct 2023021841
Nov 2023142754
Dec 2023044448
Jan 20240214203
Feb 2024214038
Mar 2024015152
Apr 2024031086
May 2024121257
Jun 2024316745
Jul 2024122463
Aug 2024119343
Sep 2024121452
Oct 2024219655
Nov 2024223644
Dec 2024014142
Jan 2025114645
Feb 2025124662
Mar 20253486143
Apr 20250262127
May 2025532271
Jun 2025422191
Jul 2025537784
Aug 20252319122
Sep 2025397495
Oct 2025829462
Nov 2025831394
Dec 2025735175
Jan 20261250182
Feb 2026314417

Cited By...

  • 122 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 7 (3)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 7, No. 3
September 23, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Provider Bias in Family Planning Services: A Review of Its Meaning and Manifestations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Provider Bias in Family Planning Services: A Review of Its Meaning and Manifestations
Julie Solo, Mario Festin
Global Health: Science and Practice Sep 2019, 7 (3) 371-385; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00130

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Provider Bias in Family Planning Services: A Review of Its Meaning and Manifestations
Julie Solo, Mario Festin
Global Health: Science and Practice Sep 2019, 7 (3) 371-385; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00130
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Challenges to informed choice counselling: a qualitative study of contraceptive self-care introduction in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia
  • Recognising and responding to reproductive coercion in general practice: a qualitative study
  • Equity in Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare
  • Implementing Quality Improvement Initiatives to Improve the Use of Adolescent- and Youth-Friendly Health Services in Zou, Benin
  • Boosting Contraceptive Uptake in Urban Uganda: Older Women Benefit When Layering Adolescent and Youth Interventions Onto Existing Family Planning Programming
  • Lessons learnt from daily oral PrEP delivery to inform national planning for PrEP ring introduction for women in low-income and middle-income countries: a qualitative inquiry of international stakeholders
  • Methods and Measures to Assess Health Care Provider Behavior and Behavioral Determinants in Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health: A Rapid Review
  • Six Recommendations for Provider Behavior Change in Family Planning
  • Priorities for research on family planning impact: recommendations of a WHO Think Tank meeting
  • Exploring Upward and Downward Provider Biases in Family Planning: The Case of Parity
  • What contraceptive side effects are women told about during counseling? Evidence from PMA Ethiopia 2019 cross-sectional survey
  • Language and Measurement of Contraceptive Need and Making These Indicators More Meaningful for Measuring Fertility Intentions of Women and Girls
  • Transitioning to Digital Systems: The Role of World Health Organizations Digital Adaptation Kits in Operationalizing Recommendations and Interoperability Standards
  • Pregnancy-related healthcare utilisation in Agincourt, South Africa, 1993-2018: a longitudinal surveillance study of rural mothers
  • 'I havent heard much about other methods: quality of care and person-centredness in a programme to promote the postpartum intrauterine device in Tanzania
  • Lactational amenorrhoea among adolescent girls in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review
  • Insights Into Provider Bias in Family Planning from a Novel Shared Decision Making Based Counseling Initiative in Rural, Indigenous Guatemala
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health
  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Health Workers
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire