Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
FIELD ACTION REPORT
Open Access

Identifying and Reengaging Patients Lost to Follow-Up in Rural Africa: The “Horizontal” Hospital-Based Approach in Uganda

Faraz Alizadeh, Gideon Mfitumuhoza, Joseph Stephens, Christopher Habimaana, Kwiringira Myles, Michael Baganizi and Gerald Paccione
Global Health: Science and Practice March 2019, 7(1):103-115; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00394
Faraz Alizadeh
aBoston Children's Hospital, Boston Medical Center, and Doctors for Global Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Faraz.Alizadeh{at}childrens.harvard.edu
Gideon Mfitumuhoza
bKisoro District Hospital and Doctors for Global Health, Kisoro, Uganda.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Stephens
cMontefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and Doctors for Global Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Habimaana
bKisoro District Hospital and Doctors for Global Health, Kisoro, Uganda.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kwiringira Myles
bKisoro District Hospital and Doctors for Global Health, Kisoro, Uganda.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Baganizi
bKisoro District Hospital and Doctors for Global Health, Kisoro, Uganda.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerald Paccione
cMontefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and Doctors for Global Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    The Kisoro District Hospital follow-up team (including authors Gideon Muhoza and Christopher Habimana) use motorcycles to locate patients lost to follow-up in their communities. © 2019 Charles Moon/Doctors for Global Health

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    A field worker (author Gideon Muhoza) locates and meets with a patient who was lost to follow-up. © 2019 Julius Maniriho/Kisoro District Hospital

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Lost to Follow-Up Defined at Kisoro District Hospital, Uganda, by Hospital Unit

    Hospital UnitLTFU DefinitionRationaleFrequency of Chart Review
    Ward dischargeMissed first CCC appointment by 1 monthApproximate time before clinical deterioration and/or depletion of medications.Weekly
    Inpatient TB registryMissed drug refill appointment by 2 or more weeksPatients pick up medication every 2 weeks; public health implications for breaks in treatment are significant.Monthlya
    HIV clinicMissed 2 monthly appointments (either pre- or post-ART initiation)Although patients are scheduled to pick up medications monthly, many come 1 or 2 weeks post-appointment, so a 2-month interval captures the late-comers.Every 2 weeks
    Chronic Care ClinicPatient with at least 2 prior visits (i.e., regular CCC patient) who has not returned for 3–6 months, depending on disease severity (3 months for most severe 25% of patients, 6 months for less severe)Risk severity stratification applied due to large number of CCC patients and limited outreach capacity.Every 2 months
    Nutrition clinicMissed 1 appointmentLow threshold applied due to population of vulnerable children.Monthly
    • Abbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; CCC, Chronic Care Clinic; LTFU, lost to follow-up; TB, tuberculosis.

    • ↵a TB patients identified as LTFU could be off their medications for more than 1 month since staff identify TB patients LTFU once a month.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Lapses From Care for Chronic Care Clinic and HIV Clinic Patients,a Kisoro District Hospital, Uganda, May 2015–April 2016

    New PatientsbExisting Patientsc
    CCC patients, N223441
    No. (%) of CCC patients who lapsed from cared95 (43)252 (57)
    No. (%) of lapsed CCC patients who later returned29 (31)141 (56)
    HIV clinic patients, N3611321
    No. (%) of HIV patients who lapsed from care216 (60)401 (30)
    • Abbreviation: CCC, Chronic Care Clinic.

    • ↵a Lapse from care defined as 3 or more months since the last appointment for CCC patients and 2 or more months for HIV clinic patients.

    • ↵b New patients (inception cohort) are those who first enrolled in the clinic between May 2015 and April 2016.

    • ↵c Existing patients (prevalence cohort) are those who made at least 3 clinic visits before May 2015 with at least 1 visit between January and April 2015, or, if they first enrolled in early 2015, returning at least once within 3 months after May 1, 2015.

    • ↵d Median lapse=6 months; longest lapse=19 months.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    TB, Nutrition, and Ward Discharges LTFU, 2016a

    TBNutritionWard Discharges
    Total number of new enrollees in 2016185245448b
    No. (%) of new enrollees LTFU79 (43)75 (31)182 (41)
    • Abbreviations: LTFU, lost to follow-up; TB, tuberculosis.

    • ↵a LTFU defined differently by hospital unit: TB=missed drug refill by 2 or more weeks; nutrition=missed 1 appointment; ward discharges=missed first CCC appointment by 1 month.

    • ↵b 2,545 were admitted to the internal medicine ward in 2016 but only 448 were given follow-up appointments to the CCC upon discharge.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Follow-Up Outcomes Among Patients Lost to Follow-Up, by Hospital Unit, November 2015–October 2016 (N=1,285)

    CCC (n=310)Ward Discharge (n=149)HIV (n=691)TB (n=73)Nutrition (n=62)Total (N= 1,285)
    Patients found, No. (%)234 (75)121(81)360 (52)54 (74)47 (76)816 (64)
    Recording error (not LTFU), No. (%)39 (17)11 (9)57 (16)4 (7)4 (9)115 (14)
    Referred back to KDH clinic, No. (%)142 (61)81 (67)138 (38)36 (67)32 (68)429 (53)
    Referred to another clinic, No. (%)10 (4)2 (1)84 (23)1 (2)1 (2)98 (12)
    Refused to return, No. (%)2 (1)1 (1)8 (2)1 (2)1 (2)13 (2)
    Unable to return (imprisoned, bed-bound), No. (%)2 (1)2 (1)4 (1)0 (0)0 (0)8 (1)
    Confirmed dead39 (17)24 (20)69 (19)12 (22)9 (19)153 (19)
    Patients not found, No. (%)76 (25)28 (19)331 (48)19 (26)15 (24)469 (36)
    Not at home, No. (%)9 (12)3 (11)9 (2)0 (0)1 (7)22 (5)
    Could not find home, No. (%)32 (42)15 (54)214 (65)10 (53)8 (53)279 (59)
    Moved from Kisoro, No. (%)35 (46)10 (36)108 (33)9 (47)6 (40)168 (36)
    • Abbreviations: CCC, Chronic Care Clinic; KDH, Kisoro District Hospital; TB, tuberculosis.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5.

    Patient Reengagement Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic (Lifelong) Conditions Who Were Located and Referred Back to KDH, November 2015–October 2016 (N=361)

    CCC (n=142)Ward Discharge (n=81)HIV (n=138)
    Did not return to care, No. (%)36 (25)22 (27)64 (46)
    Returned to care, No. (%)106 (75)59 (73)74 (54)
    6-month analysis not possible,a No. (%)18 (17)b19 (32)b11 (15)b
    Alive and eligible for 6-month follow-up, No. (%)88 (83)40 (68)63 (85)
    Still in clinic at 6 months, No. (%)62 (70)21 (52)43 (68)
    • Abbreviations: CCC, Chronic Care Condition; KDH, Kisoro District Hospital; LTFU, lost to follow-up.

    • ↵a Analysis not possible because either the patient file was lost or the patient died before the 6-month mark, was discharged from the clinic, or was transferred to another clinic after returning.

    • ↵b No. of patients who died before the 6-month analysis period: CCC (4), ward discharge (1), HIV (0), total (5).

    • View popup
    TABLE 6.

    Patient Reengagement Outcomes Among Patients Receiving Curative Treatment Who Were Located and Referred Back to KDH, November 2015–October 2016 (N=68)

    TB (n=36)Nutrition (n=32)
    Did not return to care, No. (%)3 (8)9 (28)
    Returned to care, No. (%)33 (92)23 (72)
    Completed therapy, No. (%)14 (42)16 (70)
    Still on therapy at time of analysis, No. (%)3 (9)3 (13)
    Referred for treatment at a closer health center after returning, No. (%)4 (12)--
    Refused treatment after returning, No. (%)3 (9)--
    Died after returning, No. (%)5 (15)1 (4)
    LTFU again, No. (%)2 (6)3 (13)
    Charts lost and long-term outcome analysis not possible, No. (%)2 (6)0 (0)
    • Abbreviations: KDH, Kisoro District Hospital; LTFU, lost to follow-up; TB, tuberculosis.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 7 (1)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 7, No. 1
March 22, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identifying and Reengaging Patients Lost to Follow-Up in Rural Africa: The “Horizontal” Hospital-Based Approach in Uganda
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Identifying and Reengaging Patients Lost to Follow-Up in Rural Africa: The “Horizontal” Hospital-Based Approach in Uganda
Faraz Alizadeh, Gideon Mfitumuhoza, Joseph Stephens, Christopher Habimaana, Kwiringira Myles, Michael Baganizi, Gerald Paccione
Global Health: Science and Practice Mar 2019, 7 (1) 103-115; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00394

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Identifying and Reengaging Patients Lost to Follow-Up in Rural Africa: The “Horizontal” Hospital-Based Approach in Uganda
Faraz Alizadeh, Gideon Mfitumuhoza, Joseph Stephens, Christopher Habimaana, Kwiringira Myles, Michael Baganizi, Gerald Paccione
Global Health: Science and Practice Mar 2019, 7 (1) 103-115; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00394
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Who does tracing work for? Characteristics of clients successfully re-engaged in ART care in sub-Saharan Africa after a tracing intervention: a systematic review
  • A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the Drivers of HIV Status Knowledge in Orphans and Vulnerable Children in Mozambique
  • Continuity in primary care: a critical but neglected component for achieving high-quality universal health coverage
  • Retaining Patients in Care: An Important but Neglected Challenge
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Disinfection of Neonatal Resuscitation Equipment in Resource-Limited Settings: Lessons From a Mixed-Methods Implementation Experience in Kenya
  • Integrating Gender-Based Violence Services Into HIV Care: Insights From Malawi
  • Early Effects of Information Revolution Interventions on Health Information System Performance in Ethiopia
Show more FIELD ACTION REPORT

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Health Systems
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire