Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
      • Call for Abstracts
      • The Responsive Feedback Approach
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Experiences With the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Among Clients, Providers, and Key Opinion Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Study in Nigeria

Gillian Eva, Geeta Nanda, Kate Rademacher, Anna Mackay, Omaye Negedu, Anne Taiwo, Leila Dal Santo, Mariya Saleh, Lucky Palmer and Tracey Brett
Global Health: Science and Practice December 2018, 6(4):680-692; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00242
Gillian Eva
aMarie Stopes International, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Gillian.eva@gmail.com
Geeta Nanda
bFHI 360, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kate Rademacher
cFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Mackay
dMarie Stopes International, New York, NY, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omaye Negedu
eMarie Stopes International Organisation Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Taiwo
eMarie Stopes International Organisation Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leila Dal Santo
bFHI 360, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariya Saleh
fFHI 360, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucky Palmer
eMarie Stopes International Organisation Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tracey Brett
gFHI 360, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Tables

    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Data Sources

    Data SourceFrequencyParticipants
    Routine MSION service dataCollected by providers at time of service on ongoing basisAll MSION family planning clients
    Supplementary LNG IUS client dataCollected by providers at time of service as part of LNG IUS programSample of LNG IUS clients (N=388)
    MSION client exit interview dataaCollected by MSION annuallySample of MSION LARC clients (N=692)
    In-depth interviewsConducted in 2017LNG IUS clients (N=33)
    LNG IUS providers (N=32)
    Key opinion leaders (N=17)
    • Abbreviations: LARC, long-acting reversible contraception; LNG IUS, levonorgestrel intrauterine system; MSION, Marie Stopes International Organisation Nigeria.

    • ↵a Used for comparison purposes, not part of LNG IUS study protocol.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Voluntary LARC Provision in Facilities Participating in LNG IUS Introduction Program, Nigeria, September 2016–December 2017

    Social Franchise No. (%)Mobile Outreach No. (%)Total No. (%)
    Implants54,720 (69.4)151,943 (88.2)206,663 (82.3)
    IUDs23,649 (30.0)19,889 (11.5)43,538 (17.3)
    LNG IUS525 (0.7)441 (0.3)966 (0.4)a
    Total78,894 (100)172,273 (100)251,167 (100)
    • Abbreviations: IUDs, intrauterine devices; LARC, long-acting reversible contraception; LNG IUS, levonorgestrel intrauterine system.

    • ↵a Public-sector figures on provision of other LARCs were not available so the 24 LNG IUS provided through public-sector facilities are not presented in this table.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Reasons for Choosing the LNG IUS (N=326)a

    ReasonaNo. (%)
    Reduced menstrual bleeding197 (61.4)
    It lasts for a long time167 (52.0)
    Effective157 (48.9)
    Nobody will know134 (41.7)
    It is convenient/don't need to do anything100 (31.3)
    Won't affect future fertility98 (30.7)
    Few side effects86 (26.9)
    Recommended by friend or family63 (19.7)
    Don't want more children59 (18.5)
    Want to delay pregnancy for at least 2 years54 (17.0)
    Can use while breastfeeding51 (16.0)
    Affordable here39 (12.3)
    Other11 (3.3)
    Not sure3 (0.9)
    • Abbreviation: LNG IUS, levonorgestrel intrauterine system.

    • ↵a Source: Supplementary LNG IUS client data collected at time of service. 326 women gave at least 1 response to this question; the women could provide multiple responses and responses were offered spontaneously.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    First Source of Information About the LNG IUS (N=347)a

    First Source of InformationNo. (%)
    From clinic staff today189 (54.4)
    Friend/family member97 (28.0)
    From clinic staff on another day49 (14.1)
    Community health worker/volunteer40 (11.5)
    Referred by other health provider38 (11.0)
    Poster/flyer15 (4.3)
    Other7 (2.0)
    • Abbreviation: LNG IUS, levonorgestrel intrauterine system.

    • ↵a Source: Supplementary LNG IUS client data collected at time of service. 347 women gave at least 1 response to this question; the women could provide multiple responses and responses were offered spontaneously.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5.

    Sociodemographic Characteristics and Family Planning Use of LNG IUS Clients (N=33)a

    Sociodemographic CharacteristicsWomen
    Age, years, mean33.8
    Marital status, No.
    Married27
    Not married2
    Number of children, mean3.2
    Education, No.
    None/some or completed primary9
    Some or completed secondary12
    Post-secondary8
    Currently using the LNG IUS, No.30
    Recently removed the LNG IUS, No.3
    Previously used family planning, No.24
    Family planning methods ever used, No.b
    Condoms5
    Pills5
    Injectables14
    Implants8
    Copper IUD8
    Other2
    Desire for future children, No.
    Yes17
    No9
    Maybe3
    • Abbreviations: IUD, intrauterine device; LNG IUS, levonorgestrel intrauterine system.

    • ↵a Source: In-depth interviews with LNG IUS clients. Sociodemographic data and data on desire for future children are missing for 4 women.

    • b Not mutually exclusive.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 6 (4)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 6, No. 4
December 27, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Experiences With the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Among Clients, Providers, and Key Opinion Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Study in Nigeria
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Experiences With the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Among Clients, Providers, and Key Opinion Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Study in Nigeria
Gillian Eva, Geeta Nanda, Kate Rademacher, Anna Mackay, Omaye Negedu, Anne Taiwo, Leila Dal Santo, Mariya Saleh, Lucky Palmer, Tracey Brett
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2018, 6 (4) 680-692; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00242

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Experiences With the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Among Clients, Providers, and Key Opinion Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Study in Nigeria
Gillian Eva, Geeta Nanda, Kate Rademacher, Anna Mackay, Omaye Negedu, Anne Taiwo, Leila Dal Santo, Mariya Saleh, Lucky Palmer, Tracey Brett
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2018, 6 (4) 680-692; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00242
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • BACKGROUND
    • PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Expanding Contraceptive Method Choice With a Hormonal Intrauterine System: Results From Mixed Methods Studies in Kenya and Zambia
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The First Differentiated TB Care Model From India: Delays and Predictors of Losses in the Care Cascade
  • Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Financial Sustainability of the HIV Response in Nigeria: A Qualitative Study
  • Evaluation of a Depression Intervention in People With HIV and/or TB in Eswatini Primary Care Facilities: Implications for Southern Africa
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire