Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
EDITORIALS
Open Access

Global Health: Science and Practice … 5 Years In

Ruwaida M. Salem and Steve Hodgins
Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):228-231; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00196
Ruwaida M. Salem
aAssociate Managing Editor, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rsalem@ghspjournal.org
Steve Hodgins
bEditor-in-Chief, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal, and Associate Professor, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Five years after launching Global Health: Science and Practice, we are seeing signs that we are helping to fill an important gap in program-related evidence. Looking forward, we seek to offer better coverage for topics that are relatively neglected in the global health literature and to publish more papers by authors based in low- and middle-income countries. We invite authors to submit manuscripts on global health programs grounded in evidence from research, evaluation, monitoring data, or experiential knowledge, and encourage readers to access and share our free articles to find scalable approaches and important lessons to inform programs and policy.

See also related infographic.

In the face of wide disparities in population health outcomes between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, there is a strong imperative to achieve and sustain large gains in population health. “Science,” in the sense of context-free evidence for the efficacy of clinical interventions that is typically reported in the peer-reviewed health literature, is certainly an important input to strategies to achieve such population impact. But even if we've identified an intervention for which there is sound evidence of efficacy, how can we ensure the effectiveness of delivery of such an intervention at scale, under real-world conditions? Such questions are addressed to some degree in the gray literature, but more often than not project reports lack rigor. This can result in global health program managers, policy makers, and donors reinventing the wheel, and failing to draw lessons from relevant experience elsewhere.

FILLING THE PROGRAM EVIDENCE GAP

We launched Global Health: Science and Practice (GHSP) 5 years ago because the United States Agency for International Development and the Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs recognized an important gap in program-relevant evidence. Our vision was to enable the global health community to better share important lessons arising from their program experience, and to do so with sufficient rigor. We also wanted to contribute to the development of new norms on how to study and document program implementation issues, with a view to informing global health policy and practice.

One of the ways that GHSP differs from most other journals is that we encourage authors not only to share the overall results or impact of their programs on health outcomes, but also to provide detail on how they implemented their programs and important contextual factors that may have interacted with features of their program efforts (Box). With such information, readers in other settings can make more fully informed judgements on the possible relevance of findings to their own settings and populations.

BOX

Attributes of GHSP

  • Focus on programs implemented under real-world conditions, with specifics on the “how” of implementation

  • Details on the context in which the program was implemented that might influence implementation elsewhere

  • Emphasis on scalable approaches with high-impact potential

  • Insightful analysis grounded in evidence—whether from research studies, program evaluations, monitoring data, or observational and experiential knowledge

Another characteristic that differentiates us from most other journals serving the global health community is that we prioritize offering program implementers themselves a platform to share their valuable program experience. Such on-the-ground program practitioners often have less publishing experience than most of those submitting to scholarly journals, so we provide mentorship at different stages to coach them through the publication process. With no article-processing fees, we offer this support free of charge for authors, and we also provide readers free full-text access to all our articles—thus eliminating financial barriers to sharing and accessing important lessons from programs. In a GHSP reader survey conducted in 2017, 60% of respondents identified themselves as program managers, providers, technical advisors, teachers, or trainers, suggesting we are reaching our main audience of program practitioners (Figure 1). Furthermore, approximately 1 in 5 lead authors of GHSP published articles and 2 in 5 of our readers come from low- and middle-income countries (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Job Function of GHSP Readers

Source: “Celebrating 5 Years of Success” infographic: http://www.ghspjournal.org/5year-anniversary.

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Current Reach of GHSP Into Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Source: Data on lead authors from administrative data and on GHSP readers from Google Analytics data (total sessions from March 2013 through April 2017).

What Is the Journal Achieving?

Since launching 5 years ago, GHSP has published 45 editorials and 273 original articles, commentaries, viewpoints, field action reports, and other types of articles, as well as 2 supplements. In total, these articles have been accessed 1.2 million times, with our most popular articles covering a range of global health topics including digital health,1,2 adolescent sexual and reproductive health,3 tuberculosis,4 immunization,5 family planning,6 health promotion,7 and health systems.8 The number of readers accessing our articles has increased each year, from about 60,000 full-text accesses when we launched in 2013 to nearly 375,000 in 2017. And many of our articles are being cited in the peer-reviewed literature. Scopus calculates that each GHSP article receives, on average, 1.24 citations (using data from May 31, 2017).8 In comparison, each article in Global Public Health receives, on average, 1.60 citations, and in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization 3.09 citations—these journals were launched in 2006 and 1948, respectively.9

Clearly, for any journal, citations are an important measure of impact. However, citations in the peer-reviewed literature are also something of an echo chamber; the literature references itself, whether or not it is having useful impact in the real world. A central part of our ambition at GHSP is to serve the policy and program community, providing them with rigorously grounded but practical lessons arising from global public health program work, i.e., “practice-based evidence.”10,11 More important to us than number of citations in the peer-reviewed literature is seeing lessons documented through GHSP picked up and influencing policy and practice.

Impact on Practice

We have some indication that insight captured in GHSP authors' work is being picked up and applied in other contexts. In a recent survey of our readers, about two-thirds reported they've applied lessons from GHSP articles in their own public health practice (Figure 3). Of those, 42% said they used lessons from GHSP to design new programs or improve existing ones. For example, a technical advisor in Nigeria made use of an article from GHSP on task-shifting provision of contraceptive implants to community health extension workers12 to advocate to the national reproductive health technical working group to allow lower-level health workers to perform family planning procedures. In Rwanda, a teacher used lessons drawn from an article on trends in HIV prevalence and sexual behaviors in Burkina Faso13 to develop an approach to sex and drug abuse-related behavior change communication work with youth. A quarter of our surveyed readers who report having used GHSP articles to inform their programs said they used the articles to create or revise training or educational materials. For instance, a clinician in India used a GHSP article on operational challenges to Ebola case investigation in Sierra Leone14 to develop a mock exercise for university students to explore how to investigate an Ebola case.

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Use of GHSP Lessons by Readers

Source: 2017 GHSP reader survey.

LOOKING AHEAD

In the coming years, we are looking to attract more readers and authors across a broad range of global health topics, including non-communicable diseases and injury, malaria, nutrition, water and sanitation, mental health, and HIV/AIDS, who share our common goal of improving global health programs and population health outcomes. We especially want to continue expanding our reach into low- and middle-income countries, to help people on the ground who are actually designing and implementing programs share what they've been learning with each other and develop more effective programs. To facilitate that, we seek to build partnerships with institutions in low- and middle-income countries to learn from their experiences while helping to strengthen their capacity in scholarly publishing. We will also continue to expand our reach by, for example, linking with other major indexing services beyond MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scopus, in which we're already included, and to explore adding new high-value features and services, such as webinars, online journal clubs, and translation of abstracts.

We seek to build partnerships with institutions in low- and middle-income countries to learn from their experiences while helping to strengthen their capacity in scholarly publishing.

Most importantly, we will keep our eye on what we set out to do 5 years ago—“to find principles and lessons learned that are systematic, replicable, and applicable in other settings”15 to contribute to stronger, more effective health programs delivered at scale and to accelerate improvements in population health status.

Notes

Cite this article as: Salem RM, Hodgins S. Global Health: Science and Practice … 5 years in. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6(2):228-231. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00196

  • Published: 2018 Jun 27.
  • © Salem and Hodgins.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00196

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Labrique AB,
    2. Vasudevan L,
    3. Kochi E,
    4. Fabricant R,
    5. Mehl G
    . mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(2):160–171. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031. pmid:25276529
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Cell phones and CHWs: a transformational marriage? Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(1):1–2. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00007. pmid:25276556
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chandra-Mouli V,
    2. Lane C,
    3. Wong S
    . What does not work in adolescent sexual and reproductive health: a review of evidence on interventions commonly accepted as best practices. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015;3(3):333–340. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00126. pmid:26374795
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Piatek AS,
    2. Van Cleeff M,
    3. Alexander H,
    4. et al
    . GeneXpert for TB diagnosis: planned and purposeful implementation. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(1):18–23. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00004. pmid:25276513
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Shen AK,
    2. Fields R,
    3. McQuestion M
    . The future of routine immunization in the developing world: challenges and opportunities. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(4):381–394. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00137. pmid:25611473
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jacobstein R,
    2. Stanley H
    . Contraceptive implants: providing better choice to meet growing family planning demand. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(1):11–17. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00003. pmid:25276512
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Coe G,
    2. de Beyer J
    . The imperative for health promotion in universal health coverage. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(1):10–22. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00164. pmid:25276559
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Adair-Rohani H,
    2. Zukor K,
    3. Bonjour S,
    4. et al
    . Limited electricity access in health facilities of sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of data on electricity access, sources, and reliability. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(2):249–261. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00037. pmid:25276537
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Journal metrics: CiteScore 2016. Scopus website. https://journalmetrics.scopus.com/. Accessed May 29, 2018.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Green LW
    . Public health asks of systems science: To advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):406–409. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.066035. pmid:16449580
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ammerman A,
    2. Smith TW,
    3. Calancie L
    . Practice-based evidence in public health: improving reach, relevance, and results. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:47–63. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182458. pmid:24641554
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Charyeva Z,
    2. Oguntunde O,
    3. Orobaton N,
    4. et al
    . Task shifting provision of contraceptive implants to community health extension workers: results of operations research in northern Nigeria. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015;3(3):382–394. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00129. pmid:26374800
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kirakoya-Samadoulougou F,
    2. Nagot N,
    3. Samdoulougou S,
    4. et al
    . Declining HIV prevlance in parallel with safer sex behaviors in Burkina Faso: evidence from surveillance and population-based surveys. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(2):326–335. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00013. pmid:27353624
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Boland ST,
    2. Polich E,
    3. Connolly A,
    4. Hoar A,
    5. Sesay T,
    6. Tran AA
    . Overcoming operational challenges to Ebola case investigation in Sierra Leone. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(3):456–467. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00126. pmid:28751468
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Shelton JD,
    2. Waldman RJ
    . A journal for global health programming. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(1):3–4. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00001. pmid:25276510
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 6 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 6, No. 2
June 27, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Global Health: Science and Practice … 5 Years In
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Global Health: Science and Practice … 5 Years In
Ruwaida M. Salem, Steve Hodgins
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2018, 6 (2) 228-231; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00196

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Global Health: Science and Practice … 5 Years In
Ruwaida M. Salem, Steve Hodgins
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2018, 6 (2) 228-231; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00196
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • FILLING THE PROGRAM EVIDENCE GAP
    • What Is the Journal Achieving?
    • LOOKING AHEAD
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • What Potential Authors Should Know About Publishing in Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Context Matters: Strategies to Improve Maternal and Newborn Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Addressing the Global Influence of Unethical Formula Marketing
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire