Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn

Table of Contents

June 2018 | Volume 6 | Number 2

EDITORIALS

  • Open Access
    Global Health: Science and Practice … 5 Years In
    Ruwaida M. Salem and Steve Hodgins
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):228-231; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00196

    Five years after launching Global Health: Science and Practice, we are seeing signs that we are helping to fill an important gap in program-related evidence. Looking forward, we seek to offer better coverage for topics that are relatively neglected in the global health literature and to publish more papers by authors based in low- and middle-income countries. We invite authors to submit manuscripts on global health programs grounded in evidence from research, evaluation, monitoring data, or experiential knowledge, and encourage readers to access and share our free articles to find scalable approaches and important lessons to inform programs and policy.

  • Open Access
    At Last! Universal Health Coverage That Prioritizes Health Impact: The Latest Edition of Disease Control Priorities (DCP3)
    James D. Shelton
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):232-236; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00193

    Sadly, we face a vast sea of health problems in global health. Universal health coverage programming should prioritize interventions with the most health impact, but instead largely succumbs to emphasizing less impactful clinical curative services. In contrast, DCP3 provides an evidence-based template that prioritizes impact. Yet even the most basic and realistic DCP3 package comes at a formidable price.

  • Open Access
    Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets for Malaria Control in Myanmar and Nigeria: Lessons From the Past, Tools for the Future
    Michael B. Macdonald
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):237-241; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00158

    While having saved many lives over the past decade, continued dependence on mass distribution of free long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) is not sufficient and may not be sustainable. Programs must be enabled with flexible policy and technical options to place LLINs within a larger context of multisectoral partnerships and integrated vector management, avoiding what happened in the DDT era, where there was overreliance implementing a uniform solution to a complex problem.

  • Open Access
    Is It Time to Move Beyond Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid for Cervical Cancer Screening?
    Shannon L. Silkensen, Mark Schiffman, Vikrant Sahasrabuddhe and John S. Flanigan
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):242-246; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00206

    Newly emerging low-cost molecular assays and improved visual tests for cervical cancer screening call into question the role of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). VIA-based screening continues to offer a low-cost, single-visit approach for screening. However, VIA is highly rater-dependent and has problematic accuracy. RNA, DNA, and protein tests are now available. They offer greater accuracy and the option for self-sampling, but the testing kits are expensive. As these new options continue to improve, the time to move beyond VIA is fast approaching.

  • Open Access
    Evidence-Based Programs, Yes—But What About More Program-Based Evidence?
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):247-248; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00192

    Policy makers and program managers are better enabled to draw relevant lessons from implementation research and program experience elsewhere when there is richer documentation on what was done and what key contextual factors may have influenced outcomes. Newly developed Program Reporting Standards from WHO provide helpful guidance on what is needed for optimally useful documentation.

VIEWPOINTS

  • Open Access
    Eliminating Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV by 2030: 5 Strategies to Ensure Continued Progress
    Alexandra C. Vrazo, David Sullivan and Benjamin Ryan Phelps
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):249-256; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00097

    To keep up momentum in preventing mother-to-child transmission we propose: (1) advocating for greater political and financial commitment; (2) targeting high-risk populations such as adolescent girls and young women; (3) implementing novel service delivery models such as community treatment groups; (4) performing regular viral load monitoring during pregnancy and postpartum to ensure suppression before delivery and during breastfeeding; and (5) harnessing technology in monitoring and evaluation and HIV diagnostics.

COMMENTARIES

  • Open Access
    Doing What We Do, Better: Improving Our Work Through Systematic Program Reporting
    Irene Koek, Marianne Monclair, Erin Anastasi, Petra ten Hoope-Bender, Elizabeth Higgs and Rafael Obregon
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):257-259; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00136

    WHO has recently published program reporting standards to guide the type of information that reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and related health programs should document to promote cross-program learning. We strongly encourage our partners and key stakeholders to make use of the new standards as part of their routine program reporting.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

  • Open Access
    Universal Health Coverage in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa: Assessment of Global Health Experts' Confidence in Policy Options
    Elisabeth Paul, Fabienne Fecher, Remo Meloni and Wim van Lerberghe
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):260-271; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00001

    Even within the fairly homogenous context of francophone Africa, among 18 options presented to experts on how to proceed toward universal health coverage (UHC), consensus was reached on only 1 with respect to effectiveness and another with respect to feasibility. The complexity and challenges of UHC as well as the weak evidence base likely contribute to this uncertainty.

  • Open Access
    Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a School Insecticide-Treated Net Distribution Program in Cross River State, Nigeria
    Angela Acosta, Emmanuel Obi, Richmond Ato Selby, Iyam Ugot, Matthew Lynch, Mark Maire, Kassahun Belay, Abidemi Okechukwu, Uwem Inyang, Jessica Kafuko, George Greer, Lilia Gerberg, Megan Fotheringham, Hannah Koenker and Albert Kilian
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):272-287; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00350

    Three years following a mass bed net distribution campaign, the addition of school-based distribution to antenatal care (ANC) distribution in Cross River State, Nigeria, increased household ownership of any net to nearly 80%, whereas ownership in the comparison area was below 50%. School distribution was nearly equitable among rich and poor, and very few households obtained nets from both ANC and schools, suggesting complementary reach.

  • Open Access
    Expanding the Single-Visit Approach for Cervical Cancer Prevention: Successes and Lessons From Burkina Faso
    Yacouba Ouedraogo, Gahan Furlane, Timothee Fruhauf, Ousmane Badolo, Moumouni Bonkoungou, Tsigue Pleah, Jean Lankoande, Isabelle Bicaba and Eva S. Bazant
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):288-298; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00326

    The single-visit approach was implemented with strong attention to systems in 14 health facilities. In the 2 largest facilities, nearly 14,000 women screened for cervical cancer over 4 years. Of approximately 9% who screened positive, about 66% received same-day cryotherapy. Attention is needed to ensure local technicians can repair cryotherapy equipment, supplies are consistently in stock, and user fees are not prohibitive to accessing care.

  • Open Access
    Observe Before You Leap: Why Observation Provides Critical Insights for Formative Research and Intervention Design That You'll Never Get From Focus Groups, Interviews, or KAP Surveys
    Steven A. Harvey
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):299-316; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00328

    Four case studies show how observation can uncover issues critical to making a health intervention succeed or, sometimes, reveal reasons why it is likely to fail. Observation can be particularly valuable for interventions that depend on mechanical or clinical skills; service delivery processes; effects of the built environment; and habitual tasks that practitioners find difficult to articulate.

  • Open Access
    Engaging Men in Family Planning: Perspectives From Married Men in Lomé, Togo
    Tekou B. Koffi, Karen Weidert, Eralakaza Ouro Bitasse, Marthe Adjoko E. Mensah, Jacques Emina, Sheila Mensah, Annette Bongiovanni and Ndola Prata
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):317-329; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00471

    Men in the study generally supported couples' use of contraception, especially citing socioeconomic reasons. Some had reservations stemming from perceptions that family planning could facilitate infidelity and promiscuity. They also thought family planning decisions should be made jointly. All men expressed interest in learning more about family planning, preferring dissemination from community health workers, trusted men, and current family planning users.

  • Open Access
    Increasing Contraceptive Use Among Young Married Couples in Bihar, India: Evidence From a Decade of Implementation of the PRACHAR Project
    Laura Subramanian, Callie Simon and Elkan E. Daniel
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):330-344; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00440

    Critical program elements to improving voluntary contraceptive use among married youth included: (1) use of a socioecological intervention model of behavior change; (2) engaging both women and men; and (3) calibrating interventions to different moments in the life cycle of adolescents and youth. Trade-offs between intensive NGO-led models and less intensive government-led models occurred in effectiveness, scale of interventions, and sustained behavior changes.

  • Open Access
    Effectiveness of SMS Technology on Timely Community Health Worker Follow-Up for Childhood Malnutrition: A Retrospective Cohort Study in sub-Saharan Africa
    Shohinee Sarma, Bennett Nemser, Heather Cole-Lewis, Nadi Kaonga, Joel Negin, Patricia Namakula, Seth Ohemeng-Dapaah and Andrew S. Kanter
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):345-355; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00290

    In Ghana, Rwanda, Senegal, and Uganda, we found positive association between community health workers (CHWs) using SMS data entry with reminder alerts and timely follow-up for childhood malnutrition screening visits compared with paper forms. This association was strongest when CHWs used SMS data entry consecutively over multiple visits than when they switched between SMS and paper forms.

  • Open Access
    Review of Grain Fortification Legislation, Standards, and Monitoring Documents
    Kristin J. Marks, Corey L. Luthringer, Laird J. Ruth, Laura A. Rowe, Noor A. Khan, Luz María De-Regil, Ximena López and Helena Pachón
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):356-371; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00427

    The majority of countries with mandatory grain fortification requirements document the technical specifications for grain fortification, such as allowable food vehicles and fortification levels required. Most document systems for monitoring. However, detailed protocols, descriptions of roles and responsibilities, means to support the cost of regulation, enforcement strategies, and methods for reporting monitoring results to stakeholders are generally lacking.

FIELD ACTION REPORTS

  • Open Access
    High-Risk Advanced Maternal Age and High Parity Pregnancy: Tackling a Neglected Need Through Formative Research and Action
    Khadidiatou Ndiaye, Erin Portillo, Dieneba Ouedraogo, Allison Mobley and Stella Babalola
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):372-383; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00417

    Harmful social norms and lack of knowledge contribute to risky pregnancies in older and high-parity women in low- and middle-income countries. A social and behavior change communication resource combining technical guidance with tangible client and provider materials was designed to address and prevent such pregnancies in Niger and Togo.

SHORT REPORTS

  • Open Access
    Malaria Case Detection Among Mobile Populations and Migrant Workers in Myanmar: Comparison of 3 Service Delivery Approaches
    Soy Ty Kheang, May Aung Lin, Saw Lwin, Ye Hein Naing, Phyo Yarzar, Neeraj Kak and Taylor Price
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):384-389; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00318

    In 3 regions of Myanmar, village malaria workers (VMWs) and mobile teams tested a higher number of people than strategically placed fixed screening points at border crossings, but VMWs and screening points yielded higher malaria positive rates. We recommend using a combination of these approaches in the Greater Mekong Subregion for such populations depending on the strategic approach of the program.

METHODOLOGIES

  • Open Access
    Monitoring Progress in Equality for the Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Meeting Demand for Family Planning
    Yoonjoung Choi and Madeleine Short Fabic
    Global Health: Science and Practice June 2018, 6(2):390-401; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00012

    As demand for family planning has increasingly been satisfied, disparities between groups within a country have also generally declined but persist. To monitor disparity across countries and over time, we recommend comparing met demand by wealth quintile because it is most comparable to interpret and highly correlated with disparity by education, residence, and region. Within country, comparing disparity in met demand across geographic region can identify populations with greater need for programmatic purposes.

Back to top
PreviousNext

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 6 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 6, No. 2
June 27, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)

Issue highlights

  • At Last! Universal Health Coverage That Prioritizes Health Impact: The Latest Edition of Disease Control Priorities (DCP3)
  • Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets for Malaria Control in Myanmar and Nigeria: Lessons From the Past, Tools for the Future
  • Eliminating Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV by 2030: 5 Strategies to Ensure Continued Progress
  • Observe Before You Leap: Why Observation Provides Critical Insights for Formative Research and Intervention Design That You'll Never Get From Focus Groups, Interviews, or KAP Surveys
Sign up for alerts

Jump to

  • EDITORIALS
  • VIEWPOINTS
  • COMMENTARIES
  • ORIGINAL ARTICLES
  • FIELD ACTION REPORTS
  • SHORT REPORTS
  • METHODOLOGIES
  • Editor's Picks
  • Most Cited
  • Most Read
Loading
Uptake and Short-Term Retention in HIV Treatment Among Men in South Africa: The Coach Mpilo Pilot Project
What Distinguishes Women Who Choose to Self-Inject? A Prospective Cohort Study of Subcutaneous Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Users in Ghana
COVID-19 Partners Platform—Accelerating Response by Coordinating Plans, Needs, and Contributions During Public Health Emergencies: COVID-19 Vaccines Use Case
Beyond Institutionalization: Planning for Sustained Investments in Training, Supervision, and Support of Community Health Worker Programs in Bangladesh
Global Research Priorities for Understanding and Improving Respectful Care for Newborns: A Modified Delphi Study
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire