Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

What Factors Contribute to Postabortion Contraceptive Uptake By Young Women? A Program Evaluation in 10 Countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa

Janie Benson, Kathryn Andersen, Joan Healy and Dalia Brahmi
Global Health: Science and Practice December 2017, 5(4):644-657; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00085
Janie Benson
aIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn Andersen
aIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: andersenk{at}ipas.org
Joan Healy
aIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dalia Brahmi
aIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Tables

    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Background Characteristics of Abortion Clients Treated in Health Facilities in 10 Countries, by Client Age, 2011–2015

    Age Group (in years)Total (N=921,918) No. (%)
    ≤19 (n=68,265) No. (%)20–24 (n=282,695) No. (%)≥25 (n=570,958) No. (%)
    Region
        Africa43,741 (64)86,356 (31)170,101 (30)300,198 (33)
        Asia24,524 (36)196,339 (69)400,857 (70)621,720 (67)
    Country
        India12,351 (18)140,765 (50)227,526 (40)380,642 (41)
        Nigeria18,639 (27)45,592 (16)94,631 (17)158,862 (18)
        Bangladesh7,959 (12)35,162 (12)112,872 (20)155,993 (17)
        Ghana13,534 (20)21,990 (8)42,639 (7)78,163 (8)
        Zambia10,221 (15)17,301 (6)30,981 (5)58,503 (6)
        Nepal3,352 (5)14,144 (5)36,914 (6)54,410 (6)
        Pakistan697 (1)5,437 (2)20,234 (4)26,368 (3)
        Myanmar165 (<1)831 (<1)3,311 (1)4,307 (<1)
        Uganda844 (1)1,006 (<1)1,359 (<1)3,209 (<1)
        Sierra Leone503 (1)467 (<1)491 (<1)1,461 (<1)
    Facility sectora
        Private18,062 (26)72,249 (26)142,644 (25)232,955 (25)
        Public50,203 (74)210,446 (74)428,314 (75)688,963 (75)
    Facility levelb
        Primary30,014 (44)135,047 (48)295,074 (52)460,135 (50)
        Secondary30,239 (44)115,472 (41)212,371 (37)358,082 (39)
        Tertiary8,012 (12)32,176 (11)63,513 (11)103,701 (11)
    Ipas-trained provider
        Yes43,373 (64)165,235 (58)342,928 (60)551,536 (60)
        No24,892 (36)117,460 (42)228,030 (40)370,382 (40)
    Gestational age, weeksc
        ≤12 weeks59,940 (91)257,377 (95)525,011 (95)842,328 (95)
        ≥13 weeks5,657 (9)12,927 (5)25,087 (5)43,671 (5)
        Missing2,66812,39120,86035,919
    Type of abortionc
        Induced abortion35,712 (55)155,123 (59)327,872 (60)518,707 (60)
        Postabortion care29,374 (45)107,331 (41)215,776 (40)352,481 (40)
        Missing3,17920,24127,31050,730
    Abortion methodc
        MVA/EVA48,400 (71)202,512 (73)413,550 (75)664,462 (74)
        Medical abortion16,241 (24)58,114 (21)113,812 (21)188,167 (21)
        D&C/D&E/Other3,086 (5)15,488 (6)24,530 (4)43,104 (5)
        Missing5386,58119,06626,185
    • Abbreviations: D&C, dilation and curettage; D&E, dilation and evacuation; EVA, electric vacuum aspiration; MVA, manual vacuum aspiration.

    • ↵a NGO-sponsored facilities were recategorized as public or private based on country context.

    • ↵b Approximately 6% of cases in India and Uganda were served in facilities that were categorized as “other”; these were recategorized as “primary.”

    • ↵c Missing data were not included in the calculation of percentages.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Contraceptive Uptake at the Time of Abortion Care Among Clients in 10 Countries, by Client Age, 2011–2015

    Age Group (in years)Total (N=921,918) No. (%)
    ≤19 (n=68,265) No. (%)20–24 (n=282,695) No. (%)≥25 (n=570,958) No. (%)
    Any uptake of postabortion contraception
        Yes48,725 (71)215,964 (76)444,503 (78)709,192 (77)
        No13,948 (20)39,631 (14)77,857 (14)131,436 (14)
        Missing5,592 (8)27,100 (10)48,598 (9)81,290 (9)
    Method category
        Short-acting42,104 (86)186,685 (86)366,709 (82)595,498 (84)
        Long-acting reversible6,621 (14)29,279 (14)77,794 (18)113,694 (16)
    Method type
        Condoms13,142 (27)60,007 (28)92,072 (21)165,221 (23)
        Oral contraceptive pills16,900 (35)95,821 (44)194,932 (44)307,653 (43)
        Injectables12,062 (25)30,857 (14)79,705 (18)122,624 (17)
        Implants4,471 (9)7,669 (4)20,296 (5)32,436 (5)
        Intrauterine device2,150 (4)21,610 (10)57,498 (13)81,258 (11)
    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Service Delivery and Clinical Care Characteristics of Clients Receiving Any Postabortion Contraceptiona at the Time of Abortion Care in 10 Countries, Bivariate and Adjusted Analysis, 2011–2015

    Accepted Postabortion Contraception (n=709,192) No. (%)Did Not Accept Postabortion Contraception (n=212,726) No. (%)Bivariate Analysis (n=921,918)Adjusted Analysisb (n=816,880)
    OR95% CIAOR95% CI
    Facility sector
        Private187,124 (26)45,831 (22)ReferenceReference
        Public522,068 (74)166,895 (78)0.77***(0.76, 0.78)0.88(0.71, 1.10)
    Ipas-trained provider
        Yes449,492 (63)102,044 (48)1.88***(1.86, 1.90)1.37***(1.20, 1.57)
        No259,700 (37)110,682 (52)ReferenceReference
    Client age
        ≤1948,725 (7)19,540 (9)0.71***(0.70, 0.72)0.87**(0.79, 0.96)
        20–24215,964 (30)66,731 (31)0.92***(0.91, 0.93)0.96(0.92, 1.01)
        ≥25444,503 (63)126,455 (59)ReferenceReference
    Gestational age, weeksc
        ≤12663,391 (96)178,937 (91)ReferenceReference
        ≥1325,777 (4)17,894 (9)0.39***(0.38, 0.40)0.73***(0.65, 0.81)
        Missing20,02415,895
    Type of abortionc
        Induced abortion438,742 (65)79,965 (41)ReferenceReference
        PAC238,504 (35)113,977 (59)0.38***(0.38, 0.39)0.55***(0.45, 0.67)
        Other/missing31,94618,784
    Abortion methodc
        MVA/EVA514,163 (75)150,299 (72)ReferenceReference
        Medical abortion151,801 (22)36,366 (17)1.22***(1.20, 1.24)1.20*(1.01, 1.43)
        D&C/D&E/other20,645 (3)22,459 (11)0.27***(0.26, 0.27)0.34***(0.27, 0.42)
        Other/missing22,5833,602
    • Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; D&C, dilation and curettage; D&E, dilation and evacuation; EVA, electric vacuum aspiration; MVA, manual vacuum aspiration; OR, odds ratio; PAC, postabortion care.

    • ↵* P<.05; ** P<.01; *** P<.001.

    • ↵a Sterilization excluded.

    • ↵b Adjusted odds ratios control for country variation and cluster on facility (using non-missing data only).

    • ↵c Other/missing data were not included in the calculation of percentages.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Service Delivery and Clinical Care Characteristics of Clients Receiving a LARC at the Time of Abortion Care in 10 Countries, Bivariate and Adjusted Analysis, 2011–2015

    Accepted LARC (n=113,694) No. (%)Did Not Accept LARC (n=595,498) No. (%)Bivariate Analysis (n=709,192)Adjusted Analysisa (n=638,666)
    OR95% CIAOR95% CI
    Facility sector
        Private36,785 (32)150,339 (25)ReferenceReference
        Public76,909 (68)445,159 (75)0.71***(0.70, 0.72)1.42**(1.16, 1.74)
    Ipas-trained provider
        Yes72,856 (64)376,636 (63)1.04***(1.02, 1.05)0.97(0.85, 1.11)
        No40,838 (36)218,862 (37)ReferenceReference
    Client age, years
        ≤196,621 (6)42,104 (7)0.74***(0.72, 0.76)0.59***(0.52, 0.67)
        20–2429,279 (26)186,685 (31)0.74***(0.73, 0.75)0.68***(0.63, 0.73)
        ≥2577,794 (68)366,709 (62)ReferenceReference
    Gestational age, weeksb
        ≤12107,155 (96)556,236 (96)ReferenceReference
        ≥133,899 (4)21,878 (4)0.93***(0.89, 0.96)1.04(0.93, 1.27)
        Missing2,64017,384
    Type of abortionb
        Induced abortion78,926 (72)359,816 (63)ReferenceReference
        PAC30,918 (28)207,586 (37)0.68***(0.67, 0.69)0.44***(0.38, 0.50)
        Other/missing3,85028,096
    Abortion methodb
        MVA/EVA83,998 (80)430,165 (74)ReferenceReference
        Medical abortion19,382 (18)132,419 (23)0.75***(0.74, 0.76)0.52***(0.44, 0.63)
        D&C/D&E/other2,204 (2)18,441 (3)0.61***(0.59, 0.64)0.86(0.68, 1.08)
        Missing8,11014,473
    • Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; D&C, dilation and curettage; D&E, dilation and evacuation; EVA, electric vacuum aspiration; LARC, long-acting reversible contraceptive; MVA, manual vacuum aspiration; OR, odds ratio; PAC, postabortion care.

    • ↵* P<.05; ** P<.01; *** P<.001.

    • ↵a Adjusted odds ratios control for country variation and cluster on facility (using non-missing data only).

    • ↵b Other/missing data were not included in the calculation of percentages.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 5 (4)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 5, No. 4
December 28, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What Factors Contribute to Postabortion Contraceptive Uptake By Young Women? A Program Evaluation in 10 Countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What Factors Contribute to Postabortion Contraceptive Uptake By Young Women? A Program Evaluation in 10 Countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa
Janie Benson, Kathryn Andersen, Joan Healy, Dalia Brahmi
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2017, 5 (4) 644-657; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00085

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
What Factors Contribute to Postabortion Contraceptive Uptake By Young Women? A Program Evaluation in 10 Countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa
Janie Benson, Kathryn Andersen, Joan Healy, Dalia Brahmi
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2017, 5 (4) 644-657; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00085
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • PROGRAMMATIC RECOMMENDATIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Strengthening Social and Behavior Change in Postabortion Care: A Call to Action for Health Professionals
  • Reducing Barriers to Postabortion Contraception: The Role of Expanding Coverage of Postabortion Care in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  • Postabortion Care in Humanitarian Emergencies: Improving Treatment and Reducing Recurrence
  • Womens Satisfaction With and Perceptions of the Quality of Postabortion Care at Public-Sector Facilities in Mainland Tanzania and in Zanzibar
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Comprehensive Strategy to Mitigate Institutional Maternal Mortality: Lessons From a Quality Improvement Initiative in Brazilian Maternity Hospitals
  • Research and Learning Priorities for a Surgical Obstetrics and Family Planning Project Implementing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Results of an Expert Consultation
  • Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program’s Contributions to Malaria Control Programs 2015–2022: Strategies, Implementation Challenges, and Opportunities
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Adolescents and Youth
    • Service Integration
  • Health Topics
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health
    • Postabortion Care
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire