Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • 5 Year Anniversary Infographic
  • More
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
    • Website Policies
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • 5 Year Anniversary Infographic
  • More
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
    • Website Policies
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Open Access

Cost of Contraceptive Implant Removal Services Must Be Considered When Responding to the Growing Demand for Removals

Jill E Sergison, Randy M Stalter, Rebecca L Callahan, Kate H Rademacher and Markus J Steiner
Global Health: Science and Practice June 2017, 5(2):330-332; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00100
Jill E Sergison
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jsergison@fhi360.org
Randy M Stalter
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca L Callahan
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kate H Rademacher
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus J Steiner
aFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

See related article by Christofield and Lacoste.

In a recently published article in Global Health: Science and Practice, “Accessible contraceptive implant removal services: an essential element of quality service delivery and scale-up,” Christofield and Lacoste emphasized the growing unmet need for quality implant removal services.1 The authors projected the numbers of implant removals in 69 Family Planning 2020 (FP2020) focus countries to more than double between 2015 and 2018 (from 2.2 million to between 4.9 and 5.8 million). The Implant Removal Task Force of the Implants Access Program Operations Group is developing best practices and solutions to meet this increasing demand.

In addition to the sheer numbers of implants that will require removal in coming years, the cost of removal services must also be considered. To begin to understand this impending resource need, we conducted a modeling exercise to forecast potential demand for contraceptive implant removals between 2016 and 2020 in the 5 countries with the highest levels of implant procurement in 2015 (Tanzania, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Kenya, and Zambia).2 We then applied a direct cost (supplies and labor) of US$2.41 per removal derived from projections based on previously developed cost estimates for Kenya.3

Our analysis differed from Christofield and Lacoste in 2 ways:

  1. Instead of assuming all implants are removed at the end of the implants' couple-years of protection (2.5 years to 3.2 years depending on the type of implant), we calculated the number of expected removals per year using cumulative discontinuation rates reported in the most recent Cochrane review assessing …

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 5 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 5, No. 2
June 27, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cost of Contraceptive Implant Removal Services Must Be Considered When Responding to the Growing Demand for Removals
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cost of Contraceptive Implant Removal Services Must Be Considered When Responding to the Growing Demand for Removals
Jill E Sergison, Randy M Stalter, Rebecca L Callahan, Kate H Rademacher, Markus J Steiner
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2017, 5 (2) 330-332; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00100

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cost of Contraceptive Implant Removal Services Must Be Considered When Responding to the Growing Demand for Removals
Jill E Sergison, Randy M Stalter, Rebecca L Callahan, Kate H Rademacher, Markus J Steiner
Global Health: Science and Practice Jun 2017, 5 (2) 330-332; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00100
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Accessible Contraceptive Implant Removal Services: An Essential Element of Quality Service Delivery and Scale-Up
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Liftoff: The Blossoming of Contraceptive Implant Use in Africa
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saving Mothers, Giving Life: Don’t Neglect the Health Systems Element
  • Authors’ Response to “Saving Mothers, Giving Life: Don’t Neglect the Health Systems Element”
  • Authors' Response to Editorial: Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: A Tall Order for Effectiveness in Resource-Poor Settings
Show more LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Editorial Board
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire