Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
      • Call for Abstracts
      • The Responsive Feedback Approach
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
EDITORIAL
Open Access

Effective LARC Providers: Moving Beyond Training

James D Shelton and Anne E Burke
Global Health: Science and Practice August 2016, 4(Supplement 2):S2-S4; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00234
James D Shelton
aJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jdshelton@jhu.edu
Anne E Burke
aJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Effective and productive providers are the key to successful provision of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). But LARCs demand more of providers than short-acting resupply methods. In addition to sound training, key elements to developing highly productive providers of LARCs include a thorough understanding of the service delivery system context; selecting providers with the most potential, especially from mid-level cadres; strong mentoring and supportive supervision; and attention to the supply chain and to demand-side support.

This special issue of GHSP, focused on long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) based on papers presented at the 2016 International Conference on Family Planning, provides testimony to the remarkable rise in the popularity of implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs), as well as some limited evidence on permanent methods. As these articles report, we see substantial uptake of LARCs in a wide variety of situations when they are provided in a quality fashion, including provision of a wide choice of methods. These situations include:

  • Public and private sectors

  • Postpartum

  • Postabortion

  • Difficult crisis-affected settings

  • Peri-urban slums

  • With vouchers for those particularly in need

  • Via a range of provider cadres.

Moreover, these articles provide insights specifically into the acceptability and provision of IUDs, which have long been recognized as underutilized.

WHAT IS NEEDED FOR GOOD LARC PROVISION?

For any health service to be successful, going beyond the technology or basic intervention alone is crucial. This lesson is particularly important for LARCs and permanent methods, which are more complicated to provide than short-acting methods. It is essential to address the local context, systems, and infrastructure through which LARCs are provided. Key situational issues include physical resources, staffing, organization of work, and cultural context.

Providers are central to the success of any health program. The global health field tends to focus on training to assure providers’ capabilities. But training alone is not enough. Drawing largely on articles in this issue, we offer observations on some program elements that are necessary to help providers be highly productive in LARC programming.

Selecting Providers With the Most Potential

Inserting and removing LARCs requires particular skills and more effort than providing many other family planning services, such as pills or injectables. Thus, providers of LARCs must be not only technically competent but also motivated to provide the service again and again. So, one selection criterion is whether a provider is likely to be able to provide LARCs often enough to keep her or his skills and have confidence in them. And that calls for selecting staff who are already motivated to provide, and even be champions for, family planning in general. Also, many nonphysician providers may find satisfaction from “task sharing”—being able to provide a service that was previously reserved for physicians—and so may be enthusiastic about providing LARCs. Providers such as midwives and qualified nurses often suit this role. In addition, it appears crucial to select providers who are likely to remain in their posts for a number of years rather than staff who are going to retire or could be transferred soon.

LARC providers must be not only technically competent but also motivated to provide the service again and again.

Mentoring and Supervising

It is telling that many of the articles in this special issue that describe full programming efforts emphasize ongoing support to providers, variously referred to as mentoring, supportive supervision, or coaching (Samuel,1 White,2 Gueye,3 Muthamia,4 Pleah5). A common strategy is to begin by recruiting, training, and deploying a core cadre of mentors, who then train and mentor other providers. Good mentoring greatly benefits any service, providing technical support, accountability, and motivation. But it is especially productive for a potentially challenging intervention such as provision of LARCs, which calls for a higher level of skill, commitment, and motivation, and for which skills are easily lost if not practiced. Good mentoring also provides broader support for provision of all family planning methods, including counseling and practical problem solving.

Good mentoring benefits any service but is especially important for the provision of LARCs.

Assuring the Supply Chain

A provider without the proper commodities cannot provide the service. And a disrupted supply chain undermines confidence in the entire service. Thus, several of the articles in this issue focus on building and maintaining a reliable supply chain. In addition to the contraceptives themselves, LARC provision requires equipment and supplies such as gloves, antiseptics, and local anesthetics. While external donors may supply the implants and IUDs, especially at the beginning of a project, disposable supplies cannot be overlooked or assumed. A reliable source of ongoing supply is crucial to sustain continuous services, particularly once programs leave the shelter of donor funding.

Provision of LARCs can be the linchpin in the effort to attain FP2020 goals.

Supporting the Demand Side

Several of the articles emphasize demand promotion activities, especially outreach to the community, including religious leaders, and some mass media communication. Promotion of IUDs, in particular, benefits from such activities. Misperceptions about IUDs persist among both providers and the general public, as documented by Twesigye and colleagues.6 Addressing such misperceptions is essential. In addition, the use of vouchers can increase demand and service seeking among clients particularly in need, as reported by Boddam-Whetham and colleagues7 and Bajracharya and colleagues.8

CONTRAST WITH A LESS SUCCESSFUL PROJECT

The project in Bangladesh reported by Rahman et al.9 resulted in some appreciable increase in use but less than in comparison districts, which had no such intensive intervention. The project included substantial training, with some focus on the supply chain and demand-side support. However, it appears the intervention was operating in a much more challenging system context than that in the comparison districts. For example, there were substantially more provider vacancies and fewer clients were contacted by community health workers in the program districts than in the comparison districts. The high vacancy rate of providers speaks to the possible importance of a stronger selection process from the outset. Notably, an appreciable ongoing mentoring or supportive supervision activity was absent. Would the Bangladesh project have been more successful had it had included stronger provider selection and mentoring components? Yes, we believe so.

CONCLUSION

In the context of availability of a wide range of other methods, provision of LARCs can be the linchpin in the effort to attain FP2020 goals to meet the contraceptive needs of millions of people. The global health community must make the necessary investment to foster the skills and motivation of LARC providers and give them sufficient system support to facilitate program success.

Notes

Competing Interests: None declared.

Cite this article as: Shelton JD, Burke AE. Effective LARC providers: moving beyond training. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:S2-S4. http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00234

  • © Shelton et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00234.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Samuel M,
    2. Fetters T,
    3. Desta D
    . Strengthening postabortion family planning services in Ethiopia: expanding contraceptive choice and improving access to long-acting reversible contraception. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:XX-XX. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00301
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. White JN,
    2. Corker J
    . Applying a total market lens: experience of Population Services International in increasing IUD service delivery through complementary public- and private-sector interventions in 4 countries. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:XX-XX. doi:10.9745/15-00307
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Gueye B,
    2. Wesson J,
    3. Koumtingue D,
    4. Stratton S,
    5. Viadro C,
    6. Talla H,
    7. et al
    . Mentoring, task sharing, and community outreach through TutoratPlus: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Senegal. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:XX-XX. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00328
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Muthamia M,
    2. Owino K,
    3. Nyachae P,
    4. Kilonzo M,
    5. Kamau M,
    6. Otai J,
    7. et al
    . The Tupange Project in Kenya: a multifaceted approach to increasing use of long-acting reversible contraceptives. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:XX-XX. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00306
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Pleah T,
    2. Hyjazi Y,
    3. Austin S,
    4. Diallo A,
    5. Dao Bk,
    6. Waxman R,
    7. et al
    . Increasing use of postpartum family planning and the postpartum IUD: early experiences in West and Central Africa. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:XX-XX. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00039
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Twesigye R,
    2. Buyungo P,
    3. Kaula H,
    4. Buwembo D
    . Ugandan women’s view of the IUD: generally favorable but many have misperceptions about health risks. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:XX-XX. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00304
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Boddam-Whetham L,
    2. Gul X,
    3. Al-Kobati E,
    4. Gorter AC
    . Vouchers in fragile states: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception in Yemen and Pakistan. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:XX-XX. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00308
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Bajracharya A,
    2. Veasnakiry L,
    3. Rathavy T,
    4. Bellows B
    . Positive impact of a reproductive health voucher program on uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Cambodia: evidence from a difference-in-difference analysis. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:XX-XX. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00083
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Rahman M,
    2. Haider MM,
    3. Curtis SL,
    4. Lance PM
    . The Mayer Hashi large-scale program to increase use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and permanent methods in Bangladesh: explaining the disappointing results. An outcome and process evaluation. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4 Suppl 2:XX-XX. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00313
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 4 (Supplement 2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 4, No. Supplement 2
August 11, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effective LARC Providers: Moving Beyond Training
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effective LARC Providers: Moving Beyond Training
James D Shelton, Anne E Burke
Global Health: Science and Practice Aug 2016, 4 (Supplement 2) S2-S4; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00234

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effective LARC Providers: Moving Beyond Training
James D Shelton, Anne E Burke
Global Health: Science and Practice Aug 2016, 4 (Supplement 2) S2-S4; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00234
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • WHAT IS NEEDED FOR GOOD LARC PROVISION?
    • CONTRAST WITH A LESS SUCCESSFUL PROJECT
    • CONCLUSION
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Nurturing and Optimizing Networks of Care to Maximize Benefits to Patients, Health Workers, and Health Systems
  • Improving Maternity Care in India’s Private Hospitals: Quality Certification? Yes, but More Is Needed
  • Learning Health Systems to Bridge the Evidence-Policy-Practice Gap in Primary Health Care: Lessons From the African Health Initiative
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Health Workers
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire