Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
      • Call for Abstracts
      • The Responsive Feedback Approach
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
EDITORIAL
Open Access

Vasectomy: A Long, Slow Haul to Successful Takeoff

James D Shelton and Roy Jacobstein
Global Health: Science and Practice December 2016, 4(4):514-517; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00355
James D Shelton
a Editor-in-Chief, Global Health: Science and Practice, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jdshelton@jhu.edu
Roy Jacobstein
b Senior Medical Advisor, IntraHealth International, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Vasectomy use is plagued by low demand among men. Nevertheless, its compelling advantages make substantial investment worthwhile. On the supply side, a priority is to actively link vasectomy with service delivery approaches for the other highly effective long-acting and permanent clinical methods. Robust demand generation should include messaging specific to vasectomy, but should also draw on broader social and behavior change communication efforts increasingly aimed at engaging men in family planning.

Despite vasectomy's well-recognized benefits including high contraceptive effectiveness, convenience, permanence, relative ease of provision, few side effects, and high levels of satisfaction, use of the method has plateaued globally (Figure)1–3 and continues to languish in most low- and middle-income countries, including having a 0.0% prevalence in Africa.4 This issue of GHSP includes a review by Shattuck et al. of program reports and research on vasectomy, in which the authors also advocate increased support for vasectomy.5 The review has some gaps, in part because of limitations of the review criteria. Nevertheless, we publish the article because we believe it is important to share such evidence as widely as possible, particularly since vasectomy is one of only two modern male contraceptive methods available (along with condoms). Moreover, we provide our own additional perspective here because we believe vasectomy merits more attention and advocacy—recognizing that fulfilling the potential for vasectomy will require long-term and substantial investment.

FIGURE
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE

Trends in Worldwide Use of Permanent Contraceptive Methods

Estimates based on UN 2015,1 UN 2012,2 and EngenderHealth 2002.3

LOW DEMAND FROM MEN IS THE OVERRIDING ISSUE

Let's put front and center the fundamental underlying constraint to vasectomy uptake—low demand for the method among men in low- and middle-income countries. Among the many reasons for low demand:

  • First and foremost, men and women typically see contraception as women's responsibility, partly because women bear the brunt of childbearing—thus a gender-equality issue.

  • Simple awareness of vasectomy is the lowest, by far, among all highly effective methods.

  • Even when men and women know of the method, their knowledge is fraught with myths and misconceptions—notably that vasectomy is castration or makes men weak.

  • Couples often do not discuss any kind of contraception, including vasectomy, among themselves.

  • Men are squeamish about physical contact with the area of the scrotum and testes.

  • Men seek routine health care less frequently than women and have little familiarity with the health system.

  • Providers themselves often have poor knowledge about vasectomy or bias against it, and so they fail to discuss it or provide accurate information to clients.

  • Deciding to have a vasectomy requires coming to a psychological resolution that one's reproductive years have come to an end.

  • Getting a vasectomy is a new and one-time act with which men have no familiarity and thus lack self-efficacy.

  • As with adoption of any method of contraception, potential clients may sometimes have many other priorities in their lives that take precedence.

THOUGHTS ON THE REVIEW

We appreciate the contribution Shattuck and colleagues have made in assembling their review, including reaching deeply into the gray literature, framing the findings according to the Supply–Enabling Environment–Demand (SEED) model, and providing productive insights. And the authors do address the pivotal demand conundrum. Still, we would have preferred if they had taken on more fully the overriding issue of weak demand, laying out its complete scope and challenges. Another concern is that their analysis largely lacks program outcome results. The reality is that vasectomy programming has generally been carried out through modestly resourced pilot programs of short duration—yielding very modest results. We need to acknowledge that reality.

Also, since the overriding problem is very low demand, supply-side issues such as task shifting, training, vasectomy technique, and mobile outreach that were covered in the review have some relevance but are still rather secondary. Focusing on them can detract from attention to the main issue of limited demand. Moreover, focusing on those supply-side issues can foster the misapprehension that if only we could make vasectomy more accessible, its use would rise substantially.

Lastly, we see little merit in the article's proposal of active integration of vasectomy with current male circumcision programming. The large majority of male circumcision recipients for HIV prevention currently are very young men—even boys. Conversely, the main audience for vasectomy is much older men who are interested in having no additional children. Likewise, male circumcision providers, particularly those working on programs offering voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention, are often fully occupied with providing male circumcision and may have little knowledge of family planning provision. Merely training them in vasectomy, especially in the nearly universal context of low vasectomy demand, doesn't seem very worthwhile. We do see value, however, in trying to reach these boys and young men with messages on contraception and reproductive health in general and on positive gender norms.

WHY INVEST IN VASECTOMY?

It is reasonable to ask how much investment in vasectomy currently makes sense, compared with alternative investments, recognizing that resources are limited. For example, long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), particularly implants, have many of the same positive attributes as vasectomy, are in high demand, and are being effectively provided at very large scale.6,7 Nevertheless, in our view, the following points argue for increased attention to vasectomy:

  • Men's and women's fertility preferences are generally now comparable in many countries.8,9

  • Demand for effective modern contraception in general will continue to rise.

  • Demand for limiting further births is already very high, exceeding demand for spacing among married women in most regions of the world and rising in Africa.10,11

  • Female sterilization is the most widely used contraceptive method in the world—more than 235 million women rely on it (Figure), and it has substantial use even in some very low-income African countries via mobile services.12

  • Vasectomy has the many positive method characteristics we noted above, and is easier and safer to provide than female sterilization.

  • Social norms on gender equality are changing in a positive direction and that change will probably accelerate.

  • Supporting wider individual and couple choice promotes better client satisfaction and use of contraception, as well as individual rights.

Notably, evidence from a number of countries demonstrates that over time vasectomy can account for a significant component of contraceptive use. It comprises 24%–31% of such use in some countries with high socioeconomic development, such as Canada, New Zealand, South Korea, and the United Kingdom, and it also has sizable use in several low- and middle-income countries, including Brazil, Bhutan, Iran, and Nepal.4

GETTING BEYOND THE SMALL PILOT PARADIGM BY PACKAGING VASECTOMY WITH OTHER CLINICAL METHODS

Clearly, getting to a vasectomy takeoff requires emphasis on good-quality services and wide access on the supply side as well as a robust demand component. Heretofore, the typical approach to vasectomy has been to nurture a selected number of dedicated champion providers, intended to become a hub of expanded programmatic activity. But these efforts have been small and limited in funding, scope, duration, and priority. Establishing a nucleus of committed, well-supported vasectomy providers who can serve as champions for the method and a platform for expansion continues to make sense. This model appears to be beginning to take hold in Rwanda, which (albeit an exceptional country for health service delivery) has 0.2% contraceptive prevalence for vasectomy (2014-15 DHS), compared to 0.0% in 2010.13,14

But linking vasectomy more squarely to existing service delivery platforms such as mobile outreach, which is currently providing widespread, high-quality access to LARCs and female sterilization, offers another major opportunity. We have already seen that making intrauterine devices (IUDs) available in the context of high-quality provision of implants improves use of IUDs—which have long tended to be underutilized.15

HARMONIZING VASECTOMY DEMAND GENERATION WITH BROADER FAMILY PLANNING COMMUNICATION AIMED AT MEN

Since demand is clearly the overriding constraint, intensive and sustained demand generation must be a key part of the solution. Some of that demand support, of course, needs to be specifically about vasectomy including promoting the benefits of vasectomy and dispelling misconceptions about it. But men are increasingly the target audience of social and behavior change communication efforts for family planning more generally. Given limited resources, the effort to increase vasectomy demand should draw on harmonized broader family planning demand support aimed at men. Examples of this broader messaging include:

  • Promoting a positive image for family planning

  • Increasing couple communication

  • Advancing the advantages of healthy timing and spacing of pregnancies, including limiting fertility for those who have reached desired family size

  • Promoting an active role for men in pregnancy planning

  • Projecting images such as the “permanent smile” of vasectomy users16

  • Projecting the potential better sexual satisfaction when the couple is freed from the worry of unwanted pregnancy

Moreover, broader development efforts to advance gender equality should, in turn, promote the appropriate role for men in family planning as a client, supportive partner, and advocate.

CONCLUSION

We believe serious, increased, and sustained support to vasectomy is warranted. But no one should harbor any illusion that substantial impact will occur quickly. Rather, it calls for plugging away, year after year, until takeoff is reached and a substantial proportion of men in low- and middle-income countries opt for vasectomy.

Notes

Competing Interests: None declared.

First Published Online: 2016 Dec 23

Cite this article as: Shelton JD, Jacobstein R. Vasectomy: a long, slow haul to successful takeoff. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(4):514–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00355

  • © Shelton and Jacobstein.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00355

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    United Nations (UN), Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World contraceptive use 2015. New York: UN; 2015. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/dataset/contraception/wcu2015.shtml
  2. 2.↵
    United Nations (UN), Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World contraceptive use 2011. New York: UN; 2012. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/contraceptive2011.htm
  3. 3.↵
    EngenderHealth. Contraceptive sterilization: global issues and trends. New York: EngenderHealth; 2002. Available from: https://www.engenderhealth.org/pubs/family-planning/contraceptive-sterilization-factbook.php
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jacobstein R
    The kindest cut: global need to increase vasectomy availability. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(12):e733–734. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00168-0. pmid:26545447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Shattuck D,
    2. Perry B,
    3. Packer C,
    4. Chin Quee D. A
    review of 10 years of vasectomy programming and research in low-resource settings. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(4):647–660. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Shelton JD,
    2. Finkle C
    Leading with LARCs in Nigeria: the stars are aligned to expand effective family planning services decisively. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(2):179–185. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00135. pmid:27353612
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Duvall S,
    2. Thurston S,
    3. Weinberger M,
    4. Nuccio O,
    5. Fuchs-Montgomery N
    Scaling up delivery of contraceptive implants in sub-Saharan Africa: operational experiences of Marie Stopes International. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(1):72–92. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00116. pmid:25276564
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia]; ICF International. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2011. Addis Ababa (Ethiopia): Central Statistical Agency; 2012. Co-published by ICF International. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR255/FR255.pdf
  9. 9.↵
    National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria]; ICF International. Nigeria demographic and health survey 2013. Abuja (Nigeria): NPC; 2014. Co-published by ICF International. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR293/FR293.pdf
  10. 10.↵
    The RESPOND Project. A matter of fact, a matter of choice: the case for investing in permanent contraceptive methods. EngenderHealth White Paper. New York: EngenderHealth, The RESPOND Project; 2014. Available from: http://www.respond-project.org/pages/files/6_pubs/advocacy-materials/Case-for-Perm-Methods-White-Paper-2014.pdf
  11. 11.↵
    1. Van Lith LM,
    2. Yahner M,
    3. Bakamjian L
    Women’s growing desire to limit births in sub-Saharan Africa: meeting the challenge. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(1):97–107. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00036. pmid:25276520
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Jacobstein R
    Lessons from the recent rise in use of female sterilization in Malawi. Stud Fam Plann. 2013;44(1):85–95. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2013.00345.x. pmid:23512875
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda]; Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda]; ICF International. Rwanda demographic and health survey 2014-15. Rockville (MD): ICF International; 2015. Co-published by NISR and the MOH. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR316/FR316.pdf
  14. 14.↵
    National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda]; Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda]; ICF International. Rwanda demographic and health survey 2010. Calverton (MD): ICF International; 2012. Co-published by NISR and the MOH. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR259/FR259.pdf
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hubacher D,
    2. Akora V,
    3. Masaba R,
    4. Chen M,
    5. Veena V
    Introduction of the levnorgestrel intrauterine system in Kenya through mobile outreach: review of service statistics andprovider perspectives. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(1):47–54. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00134. pmid:25276562
  16. 16.↵
    The ACQUIRE Project. ‘Get a Permanent Smile’–increasing awareness of, access to, and utilization of vasectomy services in Ghana. New York: EngenderHealth, The ACQUIRE Project; 2005. Available from: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pdacg819.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 4 (4)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 4, No. 4
December 23, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vasectomy: A Long, Slow Haul to Successful Takeoff
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Vasectomy: A Long, Slow Haul to Successful Takeoff
James D Shelton, Roy Jacobstein
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2016, 4 (4) 514-517; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00355

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Vasectomy: A Long, Slow Haul to Successful Takeoff
James D Shelton, Roy Jacobstein
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2016, 4 (4) 514-517; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00355
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • LOW DEMAND FROM MEN IS THE OVERRIDING ISSUE
    • THOUGHTS ON THE REVIEW
    • WHY INVEST IN VASECTOMY?
    • GETTING BEYOND THE SMALL PILOT PARADIGM BY PACKAGING VASECTOMY WITH OTHER CLINICAL METHODS
    • HARMONIZING VASECTOMY DEMAND GENERATION WITH BROADER FAMILY PLANNING COMMUNICATION AIMED AT MEN
    • CONCLUSION
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Provider Bias in Family Planning Services: A Review of Its Meaning and Manifestations
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Nurturing and Optimizing Networks of Care to Maximize Benefits to Patients, Health Workers, and Health Systems
  • Improving Maternity Care in India’s Private Hospitals: Quality Certification? Yes, but More Is Needed
  • Learning Health Systems to Bridge the Evidence-Policy-Practice Gap in Primary Health Care: Lessons From the African Health Initiative
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health
  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Gender
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire