Figures & Tables
Tables
Strength of Evidence Description I Strong evidence from at least one systematic review of multiple well-designed, randomized controlled trials. II Strong evidence from at least one properly designed, randomized controlled trial of appropriate size. IIIa Evidence from well-designed trials/studies without randomization that include a control group (e.g., quasi-experimental, matched case-control studies, pre-post with control group). IIIb Evidence from well-designed trials/studies without randomization that do not include a control group (e.g., single group pre-post, cohort, time series/interrupted time series). IV Evidence from well-designed, nonexperimental studies from more than one center or research group. V Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical evidence, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. Note: Gray includes 5 levels of evidence. For the “What Works” compendiums, level III was subdivided to differentiate between studies and evaluations whose design included control groups (IIIa) and those that did not (IIIb).101 Qualitative studies can be classified as either level IV or V, depending on number of study participants and other factors. For more detail about these types of studies and their strengths and weaknesses, see Gray (2009).7
- TABLE 2 Effectiveness and Satisfaction With Treatment for Incomplete Abortion, Misoprostol Compared With Surgical Evacuation, 10 Countries, 2005–2012
Article Country (Sample Size) Study Design: Misoprostol/ Surgical Comparison Group Effectiveness: % With Complete Evacuation % Client Satisfaction With Procedure Comments Blandine 201217 Burkina Faso (N = 99) 400 mcg misoprostol sublingually/ referral for surgical M: 98% M: 99% PAC with misoprostol introduced to 2 district hospitals with no previous PAC service. All eligible women chose misoprostol over optional referral for MVA. Dao 200718 Burkina Faso (N = 447) 600 mcg misoprostol orally/MVA M: 94%
S: 99%M: 97%
S: 98%2 teaching hospitals. Weeks 200514 Uganda (N = 317) 600 mcg misoprostol orally/MVA M: 96%
S: 92%M: 94%
S: 95%Misoprostol was associated with less pain and fewer complications but increased bleeding. All received antibiotics after treatment. Taylor 201119 Ghana (N = 230) 600 mcg misoprostol orally/MVA M: 98%
S: 99%M: 94%
S: 89%44% were very satisfied with misoprostol vs. 8% with MVA; 95% of those treated with misoprostol would choose it again vs. 36% treated with MVA. Shwekerela 200720 Tanzania (N = 150) 600 mcg misoprostol orally/MVA M: 99%
S: 100%M: 99%
S: 100%75% were very satisfied with misoprostol vs.55% with MVA; more side effects were associated with misoprostol; greater pain with MVA. Bique 200721 Mozambique (N = 270) 600 mcg misoprostol orally/MVA M: 91%
S: 100%M: 96%
S: 100%87% were very satisfied with misoprostol vs. 37% with MVA; trained midwife provided MVA with only verbal anesthesia; tertiary hospital site. Montesinos 201122 Ecuador (N = 242) 600 mcg misoprostol orally/MVA M: 94%
S: 100%M: 96%
S: 97%47% were very satisfied with misoprostol vs. 40% with MVA; ultrasound use decreased threefold for misoprostol and MVA in 1 year. Shochet 201223 Senegal (N = 199)
Niger (N = 152)
Mauritania (N = 119)
Nigeria (N = 51)
Burkina Faso (N = 318)400 mcg misoprostol sublingually/ standard surgical care (MVA or D&C) Senegal
M: 93%
S: 100%
Niger
M: 89%
S: 100%
Mauritania
M: 91%
S: 100%
Nigeria
M: 96%
S: 100%
Burkina Faso
M: 98%
S: 100%Overall in the 5 countries M: 99%
S:98%Antibiotics given with the surgical option; success rates much higher with misoprostol after first month from introduction. Ultrasound not needed on site. Nurses and midwives had prominent roles in care in Burkina Faso, Niger, and Senegal. Abbreviations: D&C, dilation and curettage; M, misoprostol; MVA, manual vacuum aspiration; PAC, postabortion care; S, surgical.
In this issue
Postabortion Care: 20 Years of Strong Evidence on Emergency Treatment, Family Planning, and Other Programming Components
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Opportunities and Challenges of Delivering Postabortion Care and Postpartum Family Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: what works and what doesnt?
- The cost of maternal health services in low-income and middle-income countries from a providers perspective: a systematic review
- Reducing Barriers to Postabortion Contraception: The Role of Expanding Coverage of Postabortion Care in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- Womens Satisfaction With and Perceptions of the Quality of Postabortion Care at Public-Sector Facilities in Mainland Tanzania and in Zanzibar
- Healthy Timing and Spacing of Pregnancy: Reducing Mortality Among Women and Their Children
- Voluntary Contraceptive Uptake Among Postabortion Care Clients Treated With Misoprostol in Rwanda
- Findings and Lessons Learned From Strengthening the Provision of Voluntary Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives With Postabortion Care in Guinea
- Postabortion Care and the Voluntary Family Planning Component: Expanding Contraceptive Choices and Service Options
- Postabortion Care in Humanitarian Emergencies: Improving Treatment and Reducing Recurrence
- What Factors Contribute to Postabortion Contraceptive Uptake By Young Women? A Program Evaluation in 10 Countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa
- Post-abortion care with misoprostol - equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya