Figures & Tables
Figures
- FIGURE
Uganda’s 2014 CIP Development Process Compared With an Illustrative CIP Development Process Using a Partnership Framework
Abbreviation: CIP, costed implementation plan.
Ugandan officials celebrate the launch of the costed implementation plan (CIP).
Tables
- TABLE Evaluation of Partnership Success Factors and Prerequisites for the 2014 Uganda Costed Implementation Plan by Types of Relationships
Types of Relationships Factors Within the CIP Task Force Between CIP Task Force and TST Between CIP Task Force and Consultation Participants Factors with high presence across all 3 relationships Partners’ willingness to adapt to meet partnership’s needs High High High Existence of partnership champions High High High Ability to meet performance expectations High High High Clear goals High High High Senior management support High N/A High Partner compatibility High High High Factors with low presence across all 3 relationships Conflict (degree, frequency, conflict avoidance, dominating partner) Low Low Low Factors with mixed presence across the 3 relationships Perception of partners’ tolerance for sharing power Low Medium Low Trust High Medium Medium Confidence in procedures Low Medium Low Ownership High High Low Abbreviations: CIP, costed implementation plan; NA, not applicable; TST, technical support team.
